Literature DB >> 21336233

Laminar closure after classic Hirabayashi open-door laminoplasty.

Dong-Ho Lee1, Soo-An Park, Nam Heun Kim, Chang Ju Hwang, Yung-Tae Kim, Choon Sung Lee, K Daniel Riew.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective analysis of preoperative and postoperative radiological data.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence and extent of laminar closure after Hirabayashi open-door laminoplasty, as determined by multi-detector computed tomography (CT), and to investigate the influence of this phenomenon on spinal cord compression, as shown by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although laminar closure occurs after laminoplasty, little is known about its progression or its effect on restenosis of the spinal canal.
METHODS: Thirty-five patients (132 laminae) underwent classic Hirabayashi laminoplasty and were followed for at least 12 months. Multi-detector CT was performed preoperatively, at 1 week, or less, and 6 months after surgery. At each level, the anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the spinal canal and the angle of the opened lamina were measured. MRI was performed preoperatively and 1 year after surgery to evaluate the severity of cord compression based on a six-grade classification system.
RESULTS: The mean AP diameter and the mean opening angle increased immediately after surgery (P <0.05 each) and decreased 6 months after surgery (P < 0.0001 each), with the AP diameter and opening angle decreasing by 9.4% and 10.2%, respectively. CT at 6 months showed fusion of the hinge in 91% of opened laminae. Segments with high-grade cord compression (grade ≥3) at 1 year showed greater decreases in AP diameter and opening angle (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: After classic Hirabayashi open-door laminoplasty, opened laminae showed reclosure at 6 months, with approximately 10% decrease in AP diameter and opening angle. Postoperative lamina closure was associated with recurrent spinal cord compression, suggesting the need for other augmenting techniques that keep the laminae opened.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21336233     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318215552c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  10 in total

1.  [All levels miniplate fixation and a modified hybrid fixation method in expansive open-door cervical laminoplasty: a retrospective comparative study].

Authors:  Z C Yang; C X Liu; Y Lin; W H Hu; W J Chen; F Li; H Zeng
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-02-18

2.  Clinical and radiographic outcome of unilateral open-door laminoplasty with alternative levels centerpiece mini-plate fixation for cervical compressive myelopathy: a five-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Lin-Nan Wang; Lei Wang; Yue-Ming Song; Xi Yang; Li-Min Liu; Tao Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Laminar closure rates in patients with cervical myelopathies treated with either open-door laminoplasty with reattachment of spinous processes and extensor musculature or Hirabayashi open-door laminoplasty: a case-control study.

Authors:  Kentaro Yamane; Yoshihisa Sugimoto; Masato Tanaka; Shinya Arataki; Tomoyuki Takigawa; Toshifumi Ozaki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Preoperative Factors Affecting Postoperative Axial Symptoms After Single-Door Cervical Laminoplasty for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Prospective Comparative Study.

Authors:  Yanbin Liu; Le Liu; Zhi Zhang; Bin Sheng; Xuegang Lun; Zhong Cao; Jianmin Sun; Guangming Xu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-10-16

5.  Comparison between Radiological and Clinical Outcomes of Laminoplasties with Titanium Miniplates for Cervical Myelopathy.

Authors:  Jong-Hwa Park; Jae-Sung Ahn; Ho-Jin Lee; Byung-Kon Shin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-11-04

6.  Impact of different laminae open angles on axial symptoms after expansive open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Jizhou Wang; Tianwei Sun; Xiaoqi He
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Relationship between Enlargement of the Cross-Sectional Area of the Dural Sac and Neurological Improvements after Cervical Laminoplasty: Differences between Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy and Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament.

Authors:  Kazunari Takeuchi; Toru Yokoyama; Kan-Ichiro Wada; Hitoshi Kudo
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2018-06-29

8.  Comparative effectiveness of all levels miniplate fixation versus a modified hybrid fixation in cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty.

Authors:  Zechuan Yang; Chaoxu Liu; Yang Lin; Weihua Hu; Wenjian Chen; Feng Li; Heng Zeng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  Complications of Anterior and Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Keith Dip-Kei Luk
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-04-15

10.  Long-term outcomes and prognostic analysis of modified open-door laminoplasty with lateral mass screw fusion in treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Nan Su; Qi Fei; Bingqiang Wang; Dong Li; Jinjun Li; Hai Meng; Yong Yang; Ai Guo
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.423

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.