Literature DB >> 25023712

Effect of Mini-plate Fixation on Hinge Fracture and Bony Fusion in Unilateral Open-door Cervical Expansive Laminoplasty.

Hua Chen1, Hao Liu, Li Zou, Tao Li, Quan Gong, Yueming Song, Jiancheng Zeng, Limin Liu, Qingquan Kong.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Centerpiece mini-plate fixation on the complete fracture and bony fusion of the hinge side in unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical laminoplasty is an effective and safe surgery for cervical canal stenosis. The Centerpiece mini-plate is an instrument used to secure the laminae and maintain the cervical canal expansion. Stability of the new laminae is largely dependent on healing of the hinge side bone fracture and the degree of bony fusion. To date, few studies have reported on the effects of mini-plate fixation on these 2 important factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between September 2009 and March 2011, 58 patients received unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty at the authors' hospital. The group included 47 male and 11 female patients, with a mean age of 61 (range, 35-81) years. Two hundred twenty-five laminae were fixed using the Centerpiece mini-plate (group A), whereas 62 laminae were fixed using suture suspension (group B). The rates of fracture and bony fusion of the hinge were observed using computed tomography scan and compared between the 2 groups. The complete fractures were subdivided into 4 groups based on the degree of displacement of the fractured ends: type I (no displacement), type II (mild to moderate displacement), type III (complete displacement or separation), or type IV (the hinge had collapsed into the cervical canal).
RESULTS: The number of incomplete fractures and type I to IV fractures in group A were 95, 93, 25, 8, and 4 and 29, 25, 4, 2, 2 in group B, respectively. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of complete fracture rates (P=0.309) and complete fracture type distribution (P=0.694). Group A had a significantly higher rate of bony fusion of the hinge 3 months after surgery (82% vs. 70%, P=0.042); however, this rate was not statistically significant 6 months after surgery (P=0.141). For type I complete hinge fracture, group A had higher bony fusion rates, both 3 months (86% vs. 57%, P=0.004) and 6 months (92% vs. 85%, P=0.048) postoperatively. The rates of bony fusion were also significantly different among all complete fracture types 3 months (P<0.001) and 6 months (P<0.001) postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: Centerpiece mini-plate fixation in unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty might not increase the complete fracture rate compared with suture suspension and might promote bony fusion of type I complete hinge fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 25023712     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Spine Surg        ISSN: 2380-0186            Impact factor:   1.876


  14 in total

1.  Double-door cervical laminoplasty with suture anchors: evaluation of the clinical performance of the constructs.

Authors:  Takashi Fujishiro; Atsushi Nakano; Ichiro Baba; Shingo Fukumoto; Yoshiharu Nakaya; Masashi Neo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Accuracy of the trough position in expansive open-door cervical laminoplasty using computer navigation techniques: a single-centre retrospective study.

Authors:  Jianping Tian; Yuan Lin; Wu Zheng; Yuhua Xiao; Jie Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.479

3.  Comparison between Radiological and Clinical Outcomes of Laminoplasties with Titanium Miniplates for Cervical Myelopathy.

Authors:  Jong-Hwa Park; Jae-Sung Ahn; Ho-Jin Lee; Byung-Kon Shin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2016-11-04

4.  Three-dimensional Printed Patient-specific Drilling Templates for Expansive Open-door Laminoplasty.

Authors:  Xin Rong; Bei-Yu Wang; Yu-Xiao Deng; Hao Liu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Safety and efficacy of cervical laminoplasty using a piezosurgery device compared with a high-speed drill.

Authors:  Kunpeng Li; Wen Zhang; Bin Li; Hui Xu; Zhong Li; Dawei Luo; Jingtao Zhang; Jinzhu Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Multivariate analysis of factors associated with kyphotic deformity after laminoplasty in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients without preoperative kyphotic alignment.

Authors:  JunMing Cao; JingTao Zhang; DaLong Yang; Liu Yang; Yong Shen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Relationship of actual laminoplasty opening size and increment of the cross-sectional area based on single-door cervical laminoplasy.

Authors:  Xiao-Jiang Yang; Rui-Jun Tian; Xing Su; Shan-Bo Hu; Wei Lei; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Facet joint disturbance induced by miniscrews in plated cervical laminoplasty: Dose it influence the clinical and radiologic outcomes?

Authors:  Hua Chen; Huibo Li; Beiyu Wang; Tao Li; Quan Gong; Yueming Song; Hao Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  A rare, acute neurologic deterioration associated with the overactive autoimmune response of ankylosing spondylitis after cervical laminoplasty: A case report.

Authors:  Hua Chen; Hao Liu; Beiyu Wang; Yuxiao Deng; Chen Ding
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Multivariate Analysis of Factors Associated With Axial Symptoms in Unilateral Expansive Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty With Miniplate Fixation.

Authors:  Hua Chen; Hao Liu; Yuxiao Deng; Quan Gong; Tao Li; Yueming Song
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.