Literature DB >> 27904429

There are No Differences between Factors Determining Graft Infection in Autologous Bone Flap Replacement and Acrylic Cranioplasty: A Prospective Observational Study at Hospital Kuala Lumpur.

Siti Azleen Mohamad1, Mohd Safari Mohd Haspani1, Badrisyah Idris2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study, conducted in 2012, was performed to determine the incidence of graft infection after cranioplasty procedures and factors affecting the graft infection rate at Hospital Kuala Lumpur (HKL).
METHODOLOGY: This was an observational cross-sectional case study of patients who have undergone cranioplasty at HKL over a period of one year (2012). One hundred seventy-two patients were included in the study. A total of 105 (61.8%) cases were autologous bone flap replacements, and 67 (38.2%) were acrylic cranioplasty. RESULT: A total of five infected grafts were identified among the 172 cases included in the study, resulting in an overall infection rate of 2.9%. Of this infected group, three (4.5%) were cases of cranioplasty and two (1.9%) were cases of autologous bone flap replacement. There was high proportion of male patients undergoing cranioplasty (118 [or 68.6%]) and only 54 (or 31.4%) female patients. The primary pathology in the majority of patients (126 [or 73.2%]) was due to trauma; only 46 cases (or 26.8%) did not result from trauma. Of the patients, 123 (or 71.5%) had undergone a single cranial procedure prior to their cranioplasty, and 43 (or 28.5%) had undergone multiple cranial procedures. Most of the patients (114 [or 66.3%]) underwent cranioplasty 90 days after undergoing decompressive craniectomy while 58 (or 33.7%) underwent cranioplasty less than 90 days after decompressive craniectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cranium; graft; infection; neuroscience

Year:  2016        PMID: 27904429      PMCID: PMC5101970          DOI: 10.21315/mjms2016.23.5.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Malays J Med Sci        ISSN: 1394-195X


  10 in total

1.  CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections.

Authors:  T C Horan; R P Gaynes; W J Martone; W R Jarvis; T G Emori
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections.

Authors:  T C Horan; R P Gaynes; W J Martone; W R Jarvis; T G Emori
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  RESORPTION CHARACTERISTICS OF BONE AND BONE SUBSTITUTES.

Authors:  W H BELL
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1964-05

4.  The use of refrigerated autogenous bone flaps for cranioplasty.

Authors:  G L ODOM; B WOODHALL; F R WRENN
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1952-11       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 5.  Materials used in cranioplasty: a history and analysis.

Authors:  Aatman M Shah; Henry Jung; Stephen Skirboll
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.047

6.  History of craniotomy, cranioplasty, and perioperative care.

Authors:  Larry V Carson; James T Goodrich; Charles J Prestigiacomo
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.047

7.  Open reduction and augmentation of internal fixation with an injectable skeletal cement for the treatment of complex calcaneal fractures.

Authors:  T A Schildhauer; T W Bauer; C Josten; G Muhr
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2000 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  Autogenous skull cranioplasty: fresh and preserved (frozen), with consideration of the cellular response.

Authors:  D J Prolo; K P Burres; W T McLaughlin; A H Christensen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Analyses of the factors influencing bone graft infection after delayed cranioplasty.

Authors:  A Matsuno; H Tanaka; H Iwamuro; S Takanashi; S Miyawaki; M Nakashima; H Nakaguchi; T Nagashima
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Complications following cranioplasty using autologous bone or polymethylmethacrylate--retrospective experience from a single center.

Authors:  Lukas Bobinski; Lars-Owe D Koskinen; Peter Lindvall
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 1.876

  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  The storage of skull bone flaps for autologous cranioplasty: literature review.

Authors:  Vicente Mirabet; Daniel García; Nuria Yagüe; Luis Roberto Larrea; Cristina Arbona; Carlos Botella
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 1.522

Review 2.  The Materials Utilized in Cranial Reconstruction: Past, Current, and Future.

Authors:  Haley Meyer; Syed I Khalid; Amir H Dorafshar; Richard W Byrne
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 0.558

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.