Literature DB >> 23725651

Complications following cranioplasty using autologous bone or polymethylmethacrylate--retrospective experience from a single center.

Lukas Bobinski1, Lars-Owe D Koskinen, Peter Lindvall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A decompressive hemicraniectomy is a potentially life-saving intervention following head trauma. Once performed patients are obliged to undergo a second procedure with cranioplasty. Two of the most commonly used materials are autologous bone and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). We have now evaluated complications following a cranioplasty using these materials.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 7-year period (2002-2008) 49 patients were operated with a decompressive craniectomy following head trauma. Patients received a cranioplasty consisting of autologous bone (30 patients, 61.2%) or PMMA (19 patients, 38.8%) and were followed at least 24 months. Patient data were collected retrospectively.
RESULTS: Twenty patients (20/49, 40.8%) experienced a complication that prompted a re-operation. There was a significantly higher rate of complications leading to a re-operation (53.3% vs. 21.1%, p=0.03) and a shorter survival time of the cranioplasty (mean 48.1 ± 7.8 vs. 79.5 ± 9.0 months, p=0.035) in patients with autologous bone compared to PMMA. Bone resorption and the presence of postoperative hematomas were significantly more common in patients with autologous bone. The material used for cranioplasty was the only variable that significantly correlated to the rate of complications.
CONCLUSIONS: In our series we had a high percentage of patients needing re-operation due to complications following a cranioplasty. Though generally considered a straightforward procedure, complications and associated morbidity in patients undergoing cranioplasty should not be underestimated.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autologous bone; Complications; Cranioplasty; Decompressive hemicraniectomy; Polymethylmethacrylate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23725651     DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg        ISSN: 0303-8467            Impact factor:   1.876


  27 in total

1.  Cranioplasty Results after Application of Anti-adhesive Films (OrthoWrap™) in Traumatic Decompressive Craniectomy.

Authors:  Hosseinali Khalili; Aydin Omidvar; Fariborz Ghaffarpasand; Golnaz Yadollahikhales
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2016-01

2.  Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jack Henry; Michael Amoo; Adam Murphy; David P O'Brien
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 3.  Complications Associated with Decompressive Craniectomy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  David B Kurland; Ariana Khaladj-Ghom; Jesse A Stokum; Brianna Carusillo; Jason K Karimy; Volodymyr Gerzanich; Juan Sahuquillo; J Marc Simard
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Suturing-Free Artificial Dura with Dacron Heart Patch in Decompressive Craniectomy and Cranioplasty.

Authors:  Fei Wang; Yan Xue; Si-Shun Zhao; Ting-Jian Yang; Hao-Qing Song; Hong Liu
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 0.656

5.  On-Demand Intraoperative 3-Dimensional Printing of Custom Cranioplastic Prostheses.

Authors:  Alexander I Evins; John Dutton; Sayem S Imam; Amal O Dadi; Tao Xu; Du Cheng; Philip E Stieg; Antonio Bernardo
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.703

6.  There are No Differences between Factors Determining Graft Infection in Autologous Bone Flap Replacement and Acrylic Cranioplasty: A Prospective Observational Study at Hospital Kuala Lumpur.

Authors:  Siti Azleen Mohamad; Mohd Safari Mohd Haspani; Badrisyah Idris
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-05

Review 7.  Complications and cosmetic outcomes of materials used in cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy-a systematic review, pairwise meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jakob V E Gerstl; Luis F Rendon; Shane M Burke; Joanne Doucette; Rania A Mekary; Timothy R Smith
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  Analysis of PMMA versus CaP titanium-enhanced implants for cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: a retrospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Dominik Wesp; Harald Krenzlin; Dragan Jankovic; Malte Ottenhausen; Max Jägersberg; Florian Ringel; Naureen Keric
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 2.800

9.  Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Cranioplasty Implants.

Authors:  Adam Binhammer; Josie Jakubowski; Oleh Antonyshyn; Paul Binhammer
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 0.947

10.  Effect of cranioplasty timing on the functional neurological outcome and postoperative complications.

Authors:  Ahmed Aloraidi; Ali Alkhaibary; Ahoud Alharbi; Nada Alnefaie; Abeer Alaglan; Abdulaziz AlQarni; Turki Elarjani; Ala Arab; Jamal M Abdullah; Abdulaziz Oqalaa Almubarak; Munzir Abbas; Ibtesam Khairy; Wedad H Almadani; Mohammed Alowhaibi; Abdulaziz Alarifi; Sami Khairy; Ahmed Alkhani
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.