Literature DB >> 27900714

Is There Asymmetry Between the Concave and Convex Pedicles in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? A CT Investigation.

Colin M Davis1,2, Caroline A Grant3,4, Mark J Pearcy3,4, Geoffrey N Askin3,4, Robert D Labrom3,4, Maree T Izatt3,4, Clayton J Adam3,4, J Paige Little3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is a complex three-dimensional deformity of the spine characterized by deformities in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes. Spinal fusion using pedicle screw instrumentation is a widely used method for surgical correction in severe (coronal deformity, Cobb angle > 45°) adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves. Understanding the anatomic difference in the pedicles of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is essential to reduce the risk of neurovascular or visceral injury through pedicle screw misplacement. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: To use CT scans (1) to analyze pedicle anatomy in the adolescent thoracic scoliotic spine comparing concave and convex pedicles and (2) to assess the intra- and interobserver reliability of these measurements to provide critical information to spine surgeons regarding size, length, and angle of projection.
METHODS: Between 2007 and 2009, 27 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis underwent thoracoscopic anterior correction surgery by two experienced spinal surgeons. Preoperatively, each patient underwent a CT scan as was their standard of care at that time. Twenty-two patients (mean age, 15.7 years; SD, 2.4 years; range, 11.6-22 years) (mean Cobb angle, 53°; SD, 5.3°; range, 42°-63°) were selected. Inclusion criteria were a clinical diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, female, and Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with the major curve confined to the thoracic spine. Using three-dimensional image analysis software, the pedicle width, inner cortical pedicle width, pedicle height, inner cortical pedicle height, pedicle length, chord length, transverse pedicle angle, and sagittal pedicle angles were measured. Randomly selected scans were remeasured by two of the authors and the reproducibility of the measurement definitions was validated through limit of agreement analysis.
RESULTS: The concave pedicle widths were smaller compared with the convex pedicle widths at T7, T8, and T9 by 37% (3.44 mm ± 1.16 mm vs 4.72 mm ± 1.02 mm; p < 0.001; mean difference, 1.27 mm; 95% CI, 0.92 mm-1.62 mm), 32% (3.66 mm ± 1.00 mm vs 4.82 mm ± 1.10 mm; p < 0.001; mean difference, 1.16 mm; 95% CI, 0.84 mm-1.49 mm), and 25% (4.10 mm ± 1.57 mm vs 5.12 mm ± 1.17 mm; p < 0.001; mean difference, 1.02 mm; 95% CI, 0.66 mm-1.39 mm), respectively. The concave pedicle heights were smaller than the convex at T5 (9.43 mm ± 0.98 vs 10.63 mm ± 1.10 mm; p = 0.002; mean difference, 1.02 mm; 95% CI, 0.59 mm-1.45 mm), T6 (8.87 mm ± 1.37 mm vs 10.88 mm ± 0.81 mm; p < 0.001; mean difference, 2.02 mm; 95% CI, 1.40 mm-2.63 mm), T7 (9.09 mm ± 1.24 mm vs 11.35 mm ± 0.84 mm; p < 0.001; mean difference, 2.26 mm; 95% CI, 1.81 mm-2.72 mm), and T8 (10.11 mm ± 1.05 mm vs 11.86 mm ± 0.88 mm; p < 0.001; mean difference, 1.75 mm; 95% CI, 1.30 mm-2.19 mm). Conversely, the concave transverse pedicle angle was larger than the convex at levels T6 (11.37° ± 4.48° vs 8.82° ± 4.31°; p = 0.004; mean difference, 2.54°; 95% CI, 1.10°-3.99°), T7 (12.69° ± 5.93° vs 8.65° ± 3.79°; p = 0.002; mean difference, 4.04°; 95% CI, 1.90°-6.17°), T8 (13.24° ± 5.28° vs 7.66° ± 4.87°; p < 0.001; mean difference, 5.58°; 95% CI, 2.99°-8.17°), and T9 (19.95° ± 5.69° vs 8.21° ± 4.02°; p < 0.001; mean difference, 4.74°; 95% CI, 2.68°-6.80°), indicating a more posterolateral to anteromedial pedicle orientation.
CONCLUSIONS: There is clinically important asymmetry in the morphologic features of pedicles in individuals with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The concave side of the curve compared with the convex side is smaller in height and width periapically. Furthermore, the trajectory of the pedicle is more acute on the convex side of the curve compared with the concave side around the apex of the curve. Knowledge of these anatomic variations is essential when performing scoliosis correction surgery to assist with selecting the correct pedicle screw size and trajectory of insertion to reduce the risk of pedicle wall perforation and neurovascular injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27900714      PMCID: PMC5289204          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-5188-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  35 in total

1.  Pedicle morphology of the immature thoracolumbar spine.

Authors:  M R Zindrick; G W Knight; M J Sartori; T J Carnevale; A G Patwardhan; M A Lorenz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Diameter, length, and direction of pedicle screws for scoliotic spine: analysis by multiplanar reconstruction of computed tomography.

Authors:  Katsushi Takeshita; Toru Maruyama; Hirotaka Chikuda; Naoki Shoda; Atsushi Seichi; Takashi Ono; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: An anatomical and radiographic assessment.

Authors:  A R Vaccaro; S J Rizzolo; R A Balderston; T J Allardyce; S R Garfin; C Dolinskas; H S An
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Pedicle screw instrumentation of the thoracic spine in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  U R Liljenqvist; H F Halm; T M Link
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Projection of the thoracic pedicle and its morphometric analysis.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; R Xu; M Ahmad; R A Yeasting
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Morphometric analysis of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  U R Liljenqvist; T M Link; H F Halm
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of Lenke type-1 curve exhibit specific pedicle width pattern.

Authors:  Kasim Abul-Kasim; Acke Ohlin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; J Harms; K H Bridwell; D H Clements; T G Lowe; K Blanke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 10.  Pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders: a European view.

Authors:  N Boos; J K Webb
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  11 in total

1.  Characteristic morphological patterns within adolescent idiopathic scoliosis may be explained by mechanical loading.

Authors:  Benedikt Schlager; Florian Krump; Julius Boettinger; Frank Niemeyer; Michael Ruf; Sebastian Kleiner; Meinrad Beer; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 3D vertebral morphology, progression and nomenclature: a current concepts review.

Authors:  Fraser R Labrom; Maree T Izatt; Andrew P Claus; J Paige Little
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The feasibility and efficacy of computer-assisted screw inserting planning in the surgical treatment for severe spinal deformity: a prospective study.

Authors:  Yiqi Zhang; Yong Hai; Jincai Yang; Peng Yin; Chaofan Han; Jingwei Liu; Lijin Zhou
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 2.030

4.  Zonal differences in risk and pattern of pedicle screw perforations in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): a computerized tomography (CT) review of 1986 screws.

Authors:  C Y W Chan; M K Kwan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  What is the Difference in Morphologic Features of the Thoracic Pedicle Between Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis and Healthy Subjects? A CT-based Case-control Study.

Authors:  Bo Gao; Wenjie Gao; Chong Chen; Qinghua Wang; Shaochun Lin; Caixia Xu; Dongsheng Huang; Peiqiang Su
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Is the Combination of Convex Compression for the Proximal Thoracic Curve and Concave Distraction for the Main Thoracic Curve Using Separate-rod Derotation Effective for Correcting Shoulder Balance and Thoracic Kyphosis?

Authors:  Choon Sung Lee; Sehan Park; Dong-Ho Lee; Chang Ju Hwang; Jae Hwan Cho; Jae Woo Park; Kun-Bo Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Preoperative Assessment of the Feasibility of Pedicle Screw Insertion at the Proximal Thoracic Curve in Lenke Type 2 Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Yuki Taniguchi; Yoshitaka Matsubayashi; So Kato; Takashi Ono; Yasushi Oshima; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-05-01

8.  Autonomous lumbar spine pedicle screw planning using machine learning: A validation study.

Authors:  Kris B Siemionow; Craig W Forsthoefel; Michael P Foy; Dominik Gawel; Christian J Luciano
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2021-09-08

9.  Three-dimensional morphological analysis of the thoracic pedicle and related radiographic factors in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Tatsuya Sato; Hidetoshi Nojiri; Takatoshi Okuda; Kei Miyagawa; Nozomu Kobayashi; Ryosuke Takahashi; Arihisa Shimura; Shota Tamagawa; Yukoh Ohara; Takeshi Hara; Muneaki Ishijima
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.562

10.  The Accuracy of 3D Printing Assistance in the Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Po-Chen Chen; Chien-Chun Chang; Hsien-Te Chen; Chia-Yu Lin; Tsung-Yu Ho; Yen-Jen Chen; Chun-Hao Tsai; Hsi-Kai Tsou; Chih-Sheng Lin; Yi-Wen Chen; Horng-Chaung Hsu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.