Literature DB >> 29730723

Characteristic morphological patterns within adolescent idiopathic scoliosis may be explained by mechanical loading.

Benedikt Schlager1, Florian Krump1, Julius Boettinger1, Frank Niemeyer1, Michael Ruf2, Sebastian Kleiner3, Meinrad Beer3, Hans-Joachim Wilke4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional deformity of the spine which exhibits morphological changes during growth. The goal of this study was to identify morphological patterns that could be explained by different loading patterns for AIS.
METHODS: Computed tomography data of 21 patients with diagnosed AIS and 48 patients without any visual spinal abnormalities were collected prospectively. The bony structures were reconstructed, and landmarks were placed on characteristic morphological points on the spine. Multiple morphological parameters were calculated based on the distances between the landmarks. The intra- and inter-observer variability for each parameter was estimated. Differences between healthy and scoliotic spines were statistically analysed using the t test for unpaired data, with a significance level of α = 0.01.
RESULTS: Within the healthy group, an out-of-plane rotation of the vertebrae in the transverse plane was measured (2.6° ± 4.1° at T2). Relating the length of the spinal curvature to the T1-S1 height of the spine revealed that scoliotic spines were significantly longer. However, the endplate area in the AIS group was significantly smaller once compared to the curvature length. The relation between the left and right pedicle areas varied between 2.5 ± 0.79 and 0.4 ± 0.19, while the ratio of the facet articular surfaces varied within 2.3 ± 0.5 and 0.5 ± 0.2.
CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a certain morphological pattern along the spine, which reveals a distinct load path prevalent within AIS. The data suggested that the spine adapts to the asymmetric load conditions and the spine is not deformed by asymmetric growth disturbance. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Anatomy; Biomechanics; Morphology; Spine

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29730723     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5622-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  27 in total

1.  Rotation movements of the spine with special reference to scoliosis.

Authors:  R ROAF
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1958-05

2.  Geometry strongly influences the response of numerical models of the lumbar spine--a probabilistic finite element analysis.

Authors:  Frank Niemeyer; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Hendrik Schmidt
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Vertebral wedging characteristic changes in scoliotic spines.

Authors:  Stefan Parent; Hubert Labelle; Wafa Skalli; Jacques de Guise
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Changes in vertebral neural arch morphometry and functional tethering of spinal cord in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis--study with multi-planar reformat magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Winnie C W Chu; H Y Yeung; W W Chau; Wynnie W M Lam; B K W Ng; T P Lam; K M Lee; Jack C Y Cheng
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2006

5.  Idiopathic scoliosis from the point of view of the neuroradiologist.

Authors:  M Roth
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Morphometric analysis of anatomic scoliotic specimens.

Authors:  Stefan Parent; Hubert Labelle; Wafa Skalli; Bruce Latimer; Jacques de Guise
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Is There Asymmetry Between the Concave and Convex Pedicles in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? A CT Investigation.

Authors:  Colin M Davis; Caroline A Grant; Mark J Pearcy; Geoffrey N Askin; Robert D Labrom; Maree T Izatt; Clayton J Adam; J Paige Little
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Relative anterior spinal overgrowth in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Results of disproportionate endochondral-membranous bone growth.

Authors:  X Guo; W W Chau; Y L Chan; J C Y Cheng
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-09

9.  Differential wedging of vertebral body and intervertebral disc in thoracic and lumbar spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis - A cross sectional study in 150 patients.

Authors:  Hitesh N Modi; Seung Woo Suh; Hae-Ryong Song; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Hak-Jun Kim; Chetna H Modi
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2008-08-13

10.  Three-dimensional vertebral wedging in mild and moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Sophie-Anne Scherrer; Mickaël Begon; Alberto Leardini; Christine Coillard; Charles-Hilaire Rivard; Paul Allard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 3D vertebral morphology, progression and nomenclature: a current concepts review.

Authors:  Fraser R Labrom; Maree T Izatt; Andrew P Claus; J Paige Little
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Asymmetrical thoracic-lumbar coordination during trunk rotation between adolescents with and without thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Paul S Sung; Moon Soo Park
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-02-17

3.  Evaluation of vertebral bone mineral density in scoliosis by using quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Orkun Sarioglu; Sinem Gezer; Fatme Ceren Sarioglu; Nevin Koremezli; Tolga Kara; Omer Akcali; Dinc Ozaksoy; Ali Balci
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-25

4.  Morphological patterns of the rib cage and lung in the healthy and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Benedikt Schlager; Florian Krump; Julius Boettinger; René Jonas; Christian Liebsch; Michael Ruf; Meinrad Beer; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.610

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.