| Literature DB >> 27900520 |
Esther G M de Waal1, Andor W J M Glaudemans2, Carolien P Schröder3, Edo Vellenga4, Riemer H J A Slart2,5.
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by a monoclonal plasma cell population in the bone marrow. Lytic lesions occur in up to 90 % of patients. For many years, whole-body X-ray (WBX) was the method of choice for detecting skeleton abnormalities. However, the value of WBX in relapsing disease is limited because lesions persist post-treatment, which restricts the capacity to distinguish between old, inactive skeletal lesions and new, active ones. Therefore, alternative techniques are necessary to visualize disease activity. Modern imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography and computed tomography offer superior detection of myeloma bone disease and extramedullary manifestations. In particular, the properties of nuclear imaging enable the identification of disease activity by directly targeting the specific cellular properties of malignant plasma cells. In this review, an overview is provided of the effectiveness of radiopharmaceuticals that target metabolism, surface receptors and angiogenesis. The available literature data for commonly used nuclear imaging tracers, the promising first results of new tracers, and our pilot work indicate that a number of these radiopharmaceutical applications can be used effectively for staging and response monitoring of relapsing MM patients. Moreover, some tracers can potentially be used for radio immunotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: Nuclear medicine; PET; Radiopharmaceutical applications; Relapsing multiple myeloma; Response monitoring; SPECT
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27900520 PMCID: PMC5215256 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-016-3576-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging ISSN: 1619-7070 Impact factor: 9.236
Various nuclear imaging techniques [PET and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)] and their targets
| Mechanism of action | Tracer | Target |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| | [18 F]-FDG | Glucose uptake |
| | [11C]-MET | Methionine |
| [18 F]-FAMT | L-type aminoacid transporter 1 | |
| | [18 F]-FLT | Activity of thymidine kinase |
| [11C] -4DST | Activity of thymidine kinase | |
| | [11C]-ACT | Acetate/fatty acid synthesis |
| [11C]-choline | Choline | |
|
| ||
| | [111In]-pentetreotide | Somatostatin receptor |
| | [68Ga]-Pentixafor | CXCR-4 receptor |
| | [64Cu]-CB-TE1A1P-LLP2 | VLA-4 |
|
| ||
| [99mTc]-sestamibi | Mitochondria | |
| [99mTc]-tetrofosmin | Mitochondria | |
|
| ||
| | [18 F]-FAZA | Hypoxia |
| | [89Zr]-bevacizumab | Circulating VEGF |
Legend: [18 F]-FDG: [18 F]-fluorodeoxyglucose, [11C]-MET: [11C]-Methionine, [18 F]-FAMT: [18 F]-alpha-methyltyrosine, [18 F]-FLT: [18 F]-fluoro-3-deoxy-L-thymidine, [11C]-4DST: Methyl-11C-40- thiothymidine, [11C]-ACT: [11C]-acetate, [18 F]-FAZA: 1-α-D: −(5-deoxy-5-[18 F]-fluoroarabinofuranosyl)-2-nitroimidazole, VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor, CXCR4: chemokine receptor 4, VLA-4: very late antigen-4
Fig. 1ᅟ
[18 F]-FDG-PET in MM compared to various nuclear imaging techniques (PET and SPECT)
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [18 F]-FDG | 44 | R | 82 % |
|
| [18 F]-FDG | 37 | R | 76 % |
|
| [18 F]-FDG | 192 | ND | 76 % |
|
| [18 F]-FDG | 192 | ND | 68 % |
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [11C]-MET | 10 | R | 100 % vs 60 % |
|
| [11C]-MET | 43 | 32 R | 91 % vs 77 % |
|
| [18 F]-FAMT | 11 | R | 73 % vs 73 % |
|
| [18 F]-FLT | 2 | R | very low uptake |
|
| 11C] -4DST | 10 | R | 80 % vs 60 % |
|
| [11C]-ACT | 15 | ND | 86 % vs 67 % |
|
| 11C]-Choline | 4 | R | 100 % vs 100 % |
|
| 11C]-Choline | 21 | R | 71 % vs 71 % |
|
| 111In]-Pentetreotide | 18 | R | 52 % vs 71 % |
|
| 68Ga]-Pentixafor | 14 | R | 71 % vs 64 % |
|
| 99mTc]-Sestamibi | 27 | ND | 89 % vs 97 % |
|
| [18 F]-FAZA | 5 | R | negative scan |
|
| 89Zr]-Bevacizumab | 5 | R | neagtive scan |
Legend A: [18 F]-FDG-PET in relapsing MM. B: Studies with different nuclear imaging techniques (PET and SPECT) in MM patients compared to [18 F]-FDG-PET before treatment was started.
[18 F]-FDG: [18 F]-fluorodeoxyglucose, MM: multiple myeloma, [11C]-MET: [11C]-methionine, [18 F]-FAMT: [18 F]-alpha-methyltyrosine, [18 F]-FLT: [18 F]-fluoro-3-deoxy-L-thymidine, [11C] -4DST: methyl-11C-40-thiothymidine, [11C]-ACT: [11C]-acetate, [18 F]-FAZA: 1-α-D: −(5-deoxy-5-[18 F]-fluoroarabinofuranosyl)-2-nitroimidazole; N: total number of patients studied; R: relapsed MM, ND: newly diagnosed MM.
Fig. 2Various PET imaging in MM patients. Legend: a. [18 F]-FDG-PET with diffuse hotspots in the skeleton and extramedullary. b. [18 F]-FAZA of the same patient as a with no hot spots. c. [18 F]-FDG-PET, several bone hot spots. d. [89Zr]-Bevacizumab of the same patient as c with no hot spot in the skeleton