Literature DB >> 26475305

Image interpretation criteria for FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma: a new proposal from an Italian expert panel. IMPeTUs (Italian Myeloma criteria for PET USe).

Cristina Nanni1, Elena Zamagni2, Annibale Versari3, Stephane Chauvie4, Andrea Bianchi5, Marco Rensi6, Marilena Bellò7, Ilaria Rambaldi8, Andrea Gallamini9, Francesca Patriarca10, Francesca Gay11, Barbara Gamberi12, Michele Cavo2, Stefano Fanti8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: FDG PET/CT is able to detect active disease in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and can be helpful for staging and assessing therapy response, but no standard interpretation criteria have been proposed for the evaluation of FDG PET/CT in MM.
METHODS: A group of Italian nuclear medicine physicians and haematologists met to propose new visual interpretation criteria to standardize FDG PET/CT evaluation in MM patients (Italian Myeloma criteria for PET USe; IMPeTUs) and the reproducibility of these criteria was tested. This Italian multicentre protocol was set up as a subprotocol of EMN02, an international prospective multicentre trial of the European Myeloma Network. The criteria were agreed at multidisciplinary consensus meetings. They include a description of the metabolic state of the bone marrow (BM), number and site of focal PET-positive lesions, the number of osteolytic lesions, and the presence and site of extramedullary disease, paramedullary disease and fractures. A visual degree of uptake was defined for the target lesion and extramedullary lesions according to modified Deauville criteria. MM patients who had undergone FDG PET/CT at baseline (PET-0), after induction (PET-AI) and at the end of treatment (PET-EoT) were enrolled. The patients had been prospectively enrolled in EMN02 and their PET scans were a posteriori reinterpreted in a blinded independent central review process managed by WIDEN®. Five expert nuclear medicine physicians scored the scans according to the new criteria. A case was considered read when four out of the five reviewers completed the report. Concordance among reviewers on different metrics was calculated using Krippendorff's alpha coefficient.
RESULTS: A total of 17 consecutive patients were enrolled. On PET-0, the alpha coefficients for the BM score, the score for the hottest focal lesion, the number of focal lesions and the number of lytic lesions were 0.33 and 0.47, 0.40 and 0.32, respectively. On PET-AI, the alpha coefficients were 0.09 and 0.43, 0.22 and 0.21, respectively, and on PET-EoT, the alpha coefficients were 0.07, 0.28, 0.25 and 0.21, respectively. BM was generally difficult to score since grades 2 and 3 are difficult to discriminate. However, since neither of the two grades is related to BM myelomatous involvement, the difference was not clinically relevant. Agreement on focal lesion scores and on the number of focal lesions was good.
CONCLUSION: The new visual criteria for interpreting FDG PET/CT imaging in MM patients, IMPeTUs, were found to be feasible in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FDG PET/CT; IMPeTUs; Interpretation criteria; Multiple myeloma; Standardization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26475305     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3200-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  18 in total

1.  Report on the Second International Workshop on interim positron emission tomography in lymphoma held in Menton, France, 8-9 April 2010.

Authors:  Michel Meignan; Andrea Gallamini; Corinne Haioun; Aaron Polliack
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2010-11-15

2.  Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET identifies high-risk myeloma.

Authors:  Brian G M Durie; Alan D Waxman; Allesandro D'Agnolo; Cindy M Williams
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  The role of anatomic and functional staging in myeloma: description of Durie/Salmon plus staging system.

Authors:  Brian G M Durie
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Prognostic relevance of 18-F FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with up-front autologous transplantation.

Authors:  Elena Zamagni; Francesca Patriarca; Cristina Nanni; Beatrice Zannetti; Emanuela Englaro; Annalisa Pezzi; Paola Tacchetti; Silvia Buttignol; Giulia Perrone; Annamaria Brioli; Lucia Pantani; Carolina Terragna; Francesca Carobolante; Michele Baccarani; Renato Fanin; Stefano Fanti; Michele Cavo
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of bone involvement in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: preliminary results.

Authors:  Cristina Nanni; Elena Zamagni; Mohsen Farsad; Paolo Castellucci; Patrizia Tosi; Delia Cangini; Eugenio Salizzoni; Romeo Canini; Michele Cavo; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Diagnostic performance of whole-body MRI for the detection of persistent or relapsing disease in multiple myeloma after stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Peter Bannas; Hannah B Hentschel; Thorsten A Bley; András Treszl; Christine Eulenburg; Thorsten Derlin; Jin Yamamura; Gerhard Adam; Thomas Stübig; Nicolaus Kröger; Christoph Weber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  F18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the context of other imaging techniques and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Twyla B Bartel; Jeff Haessler; Tracy L Y Brown; John D Shaughnessy; Frits van Rhee; Elias Anaissie; Terri Alpe; Edgardo Angtuaco; Ronald Walker; Joshua Epstein; John Crowley; Bart Barlogie
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Whole-body MRI versus whole-body MDCT for staging of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Andrea Baur-Melnyk; Sonja Buhmann; Christoph Becker; Stefan Oswald Schoenberg; Nicola Lang; Reiner Bartl; Maximilian Ferdinand Reiser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: importance of whole-body versus spinal MR imaging.

Authors:  Tobias Bäuerle; Jens Hillengass; Kerstin Fechtner; Christian M Zechmann; Lars Grenacher; Thomas M Moehler; Heiss Christiane; Barbara Wagner-Gund; Kai Neben; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Stefan Delorme
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Report on the First International Workshop on Interim-PET-Scan in Lymphoma.

Authors:  Michel Meignan; Andrea Gallamini; Michel Meignan; Andrea Gallamini; Corinne Haioun
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2009-08
View more
  30 in total

1.  18F-FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma: critical insights and future directions.

Authors:  Clément Bailly; Thomas Carlier; Bastien Jamet; Cyrille Touzeau; Philippe Moreau; Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré; Caroline Bodet-Milin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT combined with quantification of clonal circulating plasma cells as a potential risk model in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Abe; Kentaro Narita; Hiroki Kobayashi; Akihiro Kitadate; Daisuke Miura; Masami Takeuchi; Eri O'uchi; Toshihiro O'uchi; Kosei Matsue
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  18F-FDG PET/CT is useful for determining survival outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma classified as stage II and III with the Revised International Staging System.

Authors:  Sung-Hoon Jung; Seong Young Kwon; Jung-Joon Min; Hee-Seung Bom; Seo-Yeon Ahn; Seung-Yeon Jung; Seung-Shin Lee; Moo-Rim Park; Deok-Hwan Yang; Jae-Sook Ahn; Hyeoung-Joon Kim; Je-Jung Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Interpretation criteria for FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma (IMPeTUs): final results. IMPeTUs (Italian myeloma criteria for PET USe).

Authors:  Cristina Nanni; Annibale Versari; Stephane Chauvie; Elisa Bertone; Andrea Bianchi; Marco Rensi; Marilena Bellò; Andrea Gallamini; Francesca Patriarca; Francesca Gay; Barbara Gamberi; Pietro Ghedini; Michele Cavo; Stefano Fanti; Elena Zamagni
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  A proposed index of diffuse bone marrow [18F]-FDG uptake and PET skeletal patterns correlate with myeloma prognostic markers, plasma cell morphology, and response to therapy.

Authors:  A Paschali; E Panagiotidis; T Triantafyllou; V Palaska; K Tsirou; E Verrou; E Υiannaki; D Markala; A Papanikolaou; A Pouli; P Konstantinidou; V Chatzipavlidou; E Terpos; E Katodritou
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Prospective Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography at Diagnosis and Before Maintenance Therapy in Symptomatic Patients With Multiple Myeloma Included in the IFM/DFCI 2009 Trial: Results of the IMAJEM Study.

Authors:  Philippe Moreau; Michel Attal; Denis Caillot; Margaret Macro; Lionel Karlin; Laurent Garderet; Thierry Facon; Lotfi Benboubker; Martine Escoffre-Barbe; Anne-Marie Stoppa; Kamel Laribi; Cyrille Hulin; Aurore Perrot; Gerald Marit; Jean-Richard Eveillard; Florence Caillon; Caroline Bodet-Milin; Brigitte Pegourie; Veronique Dorvaux; Carine Chaleteix; Kenneth Anderson; Paul Richardson; Nikhil C Munshi; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Aurelie Gaultier; Jean-Michel Nguyen; Benoit Dupas; Eric Frampas; Françoise Kraeber-Bodere
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  MRD Assessment in Multiple Myeloma: Progress and Challenges.

Authors:  Luca Bertamini; Mattia D'Agostino; Francesca Gay
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 8.  Therapy assessment in multiple myeloma with PET.

Authors:  Cristina Nanni; Elena Zamagni
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 9.  Imaging in myeloma with focus on advanced imaging techniques.

Authors:  Tara Barwick; Laure Bretsztajn; Kathryn Wallitt; Dimitri Amiras; Andrea Rockall; Christina Messiou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  Minimal residual disease analysis in myeloma - when, why and where.

Authors:  Uday Yanamandra; Shaji K Kumar
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2017-10-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.