Literature DB >> 25546223

18F-FDG PET increases visibility of bone lesions in relapsed multiple myeloma: is this hypoxia-driven?

Esther G M de Waal1, Riemer H J A Slart, Marnix J Leene, Philip M Kluin, Edo Vellenga.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Whole-body x-ray (WBX) is used for detecting skeleton abnormalities in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). An alternative might be 18F-FDG PET, which makes use of metabolic changes of malignant cells. The aims of this study were to evaluate whether 18F-FDG PET detects more lesions compared with WBX in patients with relapsing MM and to define its prognostic value. In addition 1-α-D-(5-deoxy-5-[F]-fluoroarabinofuranosyl)-2-nitroimidazole (18F-FAZA) scan and immunohistochemical staining on bone marrow were performed to define whether FDG uptake coincides with angiogenesis-related tumor hypoxia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 18F-FDG PET (n = 44) and 18F-FAZA-PET (n = 5) were performed in patients with relapsed MM. Bone marrow biopsies (n = 20) were evaluated for hypoxia inducible factors (HIF) 1α and 2α, vascular endothelial growth factor, glucose transport proteins 1 and 3, and the microvessel density.
RESULTS: New lesions were more frequently demonstrated on 18F-FDG PET than on WBX (P = 0.000001). 18F-FDG PET was not predictive for progression-free survival and overall survival. Immunohistochemical staining on bone marrow biopsies demonstrated a significant increase in microvessel density and elevated expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, HIF-2α, and glucose transport protein 3 by the malignant plasma cells. However, HIF-1α expression and 18F-FAZA scan results were negative.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that 18F-FDG PET is relevant for diagnostic purposes compared with WBX in relapsing MM. The enhanced uptake of 18F-FDG PET is likely related to the activation of the HIF-2α signaling pathway but probably independent of hypoxia-induced signaling in view of the negative findings on both 18F-FAZA-PET and HIF-1α expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25546223     DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0363-9762            Impact factor:   7.794


  4 in total

Review 1.  Nuclear medicine imaging of multiple myeloma, particularly in the relapsed setting.

Authors:  Esther G M de Waal; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Carolien P Schröder; Edo Vellenga; Riemer H J A Slart
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Recent developments on the application of molecular probes in multiple myeloma: Beyond [18F]FDG.

Authors:  Shaojuan Zhang; Jingjie Shang; Weijian Ye; Tianming Zhao; Hao Xu; Hui Zeng; Lu Wang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-26

Review 3.  Signaling Interplay between Bone Marrow Adipose Tissue and Multiple Myeloma cells.

Authors:  Carolyne Falank; Heather Fairfield; Michaela R Reagan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 4.  Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Radiopharmaceuticals in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Christos Sachpekidis; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 4.411

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.