Literature DB >> 27900519

Early dynamic imaging in 68Ga- PSMA-11 PET/CT allows discrimination of urinary bladder activity and prostate cancer lesions.

Christian Uprimny1, Alexander Stephan Kroiss2, Clemens Decristoforo2, Josef Fritz3, Boris Warwitz2, Lorenza Scarpa2, Llanos Geraldo Roig2, Dorota Kendler2, Elisabeth von Guggenberg2, Jasmin Bektic4, Wolfgang Horninger4, Irene Johanna Virgolini2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: PET/CT with 68Ga-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-ligands has been proven to establish a promising imaging modality in the work-up of prostate cancer (PC) patients with biochemical relapse. Despite a high overall detection rate, the visualisation of local recurrence may be hampered by high physiologic tracer accumulation in the urinary bladder on whole body imaging, usually starting 60 min after injection. This study sought to verify whether early dynamic 68Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC)PET/CT can differentiate pathologic PC-related tracer uptake from physiologic tracer accumulation in the urinary bladder.
METHODS: Eighty consecutive PC patients referred to 68Ga -PSMA-11 PET/CT were included in this retrospective analysis (biochemical relapse: n = 64; primary staging: n = 8; evaluation of therapy response/restaging: n = 8). In addition to whole-body PET/CT acquisition 60 min post injection early dynamic imaging of the pelvis in the first 8 min after tracer injection was performed. SUVmax of pathologic lesions was calculated and time-activity curves were generated and compared to those of urinary bladder and areas of physiologic tracer uptake.
RESULTS: A total of 55 lesions consistent with malignancy on 60 min whole body imaging exhibited also pathologic 68Ga-PSMA-11 uptake during early dynamic imaging (prostatic bed/prostate gland: n = 27; lymph nodes: n = 12; bone: n = 16). All pathologic lesions showed tracer uptake within the first 3 min, whereas urinary bladder activity was absent within the first 3 min of dynamic imaging in all patients. Suvmax was significantly higher in PC lesions in the first 6 min compared to urinary bladder accumulation (p < 0.001). In the subgroup of PC patients with biochemical relapse the detection rate of local recurrence could be increased from 20.3 to 29.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: Early dynamic imaging in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT reliably enables the differentiation of pathologic tracer uptake in PC lesions from physiologic bladder accumulation. Performance of early dynamic imaging in addition to whole body imaging 60 min after tracer injection might improve the detection rate of local recurrence in PC patients with biochemical relapse referred for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT.

Entities:  

Keywords:  68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT; Biochemical recurrence; Early dynamic imaging; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27900519     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-016-3578-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  37 in total

Review 1.  Comparative analysis of multiparametric magnetic resonance and PET-CT in the management of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrea Alfarone; Valeria Panebianco; Orazio Schillaci; Stefano Salciccia; Susanna Cattarino; Gianna Mariotti; Alessandro Gentilucci; Magnus Von Heland; Roberto Passariello; Vincenzo Gentile; Alessandro Sciarra
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 2.  Role of MRI in follow-up after focal therapy for prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Pieter J De Visschere; Gert O De Meerleer; Jurgen J Fütterer; Geert M Villeirs
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  The ability of 18F-choline PET/CT to identify local recurrence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Marino Cimitan; Marina Hodolič; Tanja Baseric; Jure Fettich; Eugenio Borsatti
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-10

4.  Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla to assess local recurrence following radical prostatectomy using T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced imaging.

Authors:  Stefano Cirillo; Massimo Petracchini; Lorenza Scotti; Teresa Gallo; Annalisa Macera; Maria Cristina Bona; Cinzia Ortega; Pietro Gabriele; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT for restaging recurrent prostate cancer: which factors are associated with PET/CT detection rate?

Authors:  Francesco Ceci; Christian Uprimny; Bernhard Nilica; Llanos Geraldo; Dorota Kendler; Alexander Kroiss; Jasmin Bektic; Wolfgang Horninger; Peter Lukas; Clemens Decristoforo; Paolo Castellucci; Stefano Fanti; Irene J Virgolini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Prostate Cancer Imaging with Novel PET Tracers.

Authors:  Liza Lindenberg; Peter Choyke; William Dahut
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Prostate cancer: 1HMRS-DCEMR at 3T versus [(18)F]choline PET/CT in the detection of local prostate cancer recurrence in men with biochemical progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).

Authors:  Valeria Panebianco; Alessandro Sciarra; Danilo Lisi; Francesca Galati; Valeria Buonocore; Carlo Catalano; Vincenzo Gentile; Andrea Laghi; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Significant increase in detection of prostate cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy with an early imaging acquisition protocol with ¹⁸F-fluorocholine positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

Authors:  Giuseppe Simone; Giovanni Battista Di Pierro; Rocco Papalia; Rosa Sciuto; Sandra Rea; Mariaconsiglia Ferriero; Salvatore Guaglianone; Carlo Ludovico Maini; Michele Gallucci
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Radiation dosimetry of (68)Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) and preliminary evaluation of optimal imaging timing.

Authors:  Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Henrik Hetzheim; Wolfgang Kübler; Clemens Kratochwil; Frederik L Giesel; Thomas A Hope; Matthias Eder; Michael Eisenhut; Klaus Kopka; Uwe Haberkorn
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  PET imaging with a [68Ga]gallium-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: biodistribution in humans and first evaluation of tumour lesions.

Authors:  A Afshar-Oromieh; A Malcher; M Eder; M Eisenhut; H G Linhart; B A Hadaschik; T Holland-Letz; F L Giesel; C Kratochwil; S Haufe; U Haberkorn; C M Zechmann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-11-24       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Metaanalysis of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy for the Detection of Prostate Cancer Validated by Histopathology.

Authors:  Thomas A Hope; Jeremy Z Goodman; Isabel E Allen; Jeremie Calais; Wolfgang P Fendler; Peter R Carroll
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Comparison between pelvic PSMA-PET/MR and whole-body PSMA-PET/CT for the initial evaluation of prostate cancer: a proof of concept study.

Authors:  Liran Domachevsky; Hanna Bernstine; Natalia Goldberg; Meital Nidam; Onofrio A Catalano; David Groshar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in prostate cancer local recurrence: impact of early images and parametric analysis.

Authors:  Christos Sachpekidis; Leyun Pan; Boris A Hadaschik; Klaus Kopka; Uwe Haberkorn; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-10-20

4.  Inguino-scrotal bladder hernia: an unexpected finding on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT.

Authors:  Shirin Shahlaei; Sara Shakeri; Fatemeh Farahmandfar; Farshad Emami; Ramin Sadeghi
Journal:  Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2020

5.  Quantitative characterisation of clinically significant intra-prostatic cancer by prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression and cell density on PSMA-11.

Authors:  Liran Domachevsky; Natalia Goldberg; Hanna Bernstine; Meital Nidam; David Groshar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Clinical performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Benedikt Kranzbühler; Hannes Nagel; Anton S Becker; Julian Müller; Martin Huellner; Paul Stolzmann; Urs Muehlematter; Matthias Guckenberger; Philipp A Kaufmann; Daniel Eberli; Irene A Burger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  18F-PSMA-1007 multiparametric, dynamic PET/CT in biochemical relapse and progression of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christos Sachpekidis; A Afshar-Oromieh; K Kopka; D S Strauss; L Pan; U Haberkorn; A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Early PET imaging with [68]Ga-PSMA-11 increases the detection rate of local recurrence in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence.

Authors:  Christian Uprimny; Alexander Stephan Kroiss; Josef Fritz; Clemens Decristoforo; Dorota Kendler; Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Bernhard Nilica; Johanna Maffey-Steffan; Gianpaolo di Santo; Jasmin Bektic; Wolfgang Horninger; Irene Johanna Virgolini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with [18F]NaF PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastases in metastatic prostate cancer patients prior to radionuclide therapy.

Authors:  Christian Uprimny; Anna Svirydenka; Josef Fritz; Alexander Stephan Kroiss; Bernhard Nilica; Clemens Decristoforo; Roland Haubner; Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Sabine Buxbaum; Wolfgang Horninger; Irene Johanna Virgolini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Imaging Characteristics and First Experience of [68Ga]THP-PSMA, a Novel Probe for Rapid Kit-Based Ga-68 Labeling and PET Imaging: Comparative Analysis with [68Ga]PSMA I&T.

Authors:  Thorsten Derlin; Sebastian Schmuck; Cathleen Juhl; Steffi Teichert; Johanna Zörgiebel; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Sophie M Schneefeld; Almut C A Walte; James T Thackeray; Tobias L Ross; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.