PURPOSE: PET/CT using 68Ga-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen PSMA-11 (HBEDD-CC) has emerged as a promising imaging method in the diagnostic evaluation of prostate cancer (PC) patients with biochemical recurrence. However, assessment of local recurrence (LR) may be limited by intense physiologic tracer accumulation in the urinary bladder on whole-body scans, normally conducted 60 min post-tracer injection (p.i.). It could be shown on early dynamic imaging studies that 68Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in PC lesions occurs earlier than tracer accumulation in the urinary bladder. This study aims to investigate whether early static PET acquisition increases detection rate of local recurrence on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in comparison to PET imaging 60 min p.i.. METHODS: 203 consecutive PC patients with biochemical failure referred to 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT were analysed retrospectively (median prostate specific antigen (PSA) value: 1.44 ng/ml). In addition to whole-body PET/CT scans 60 min p.i., early static imaging of the pelvis was performed, starting at a median time of 283 s p.i. (range: 243-491 s). Assessment was based on visual analysis and calculation of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of pathologic lesions present in the pelvic area found on early PET imaging and on 60 min-PET scans. RESULTS: 26 patients (12.8%) were judged positive for LR on PET scans 60 min p.i. (median SUVmax: 10.8; range: 4.7-40.9), whereas 50 patients (24.6%) revealed a lesion suggestive of LR on early PET imaging (median SUVmax: 5.9; range: 2.9-17.6), resulting in a significant rise in detection rate (p < 0.001). Equivocal findings on PET scans 60 min p.i. decreased significantly with the help of early imaging (15.8% vs. 4.5% of patients; p < 0.001). Tracer activity in the urinary bladder with a median SUVmax of 8.2 was present in 63 patients on early PET scans (31.0%). However, acquisition starting time of early PET scans differed significantly in the patient groups with and without urinary bladder activity (median starting time of 321 vs. 275 s p.i.; range: 281-491 vs. 243-311 s p.i.; p < 0.001). Median SUVmax value of lesions suggestive of LR on early images was significantly higher in comparison to gluteal muscle, inguinal vessels and seminal vesicle/anastomosis (median SUVmax: 5.9 vs. 1.9, 4.0 and 2.4, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Performance of early imaging in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in addition to whole-body scans 60 min p.i. increases the detection rate of local recurrence in PC patients with biochemical recurrence. Acquisition of early PET images should be started as early as 5 min p.i. in order to avoid disturbing tracer activity in the urinary bladder occuring at a later time point.
PURPOSE: PET/CT using 68Ga-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen PSMA-11 (HBEDD-CC) has emerged as a promising imaging method in the diagnostic evaluation of prostate cancer (PC) patients with biochemical recurrence. However, assessment of local recurrence (LR) may be limited by intense physiologic tracer accumulation in the urinary bladder on whole-body scans, normally conducted 60 min post-tracer injection (p.i.). It could be shown on early dynamic imaging studies that 68Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in PC lesions occurs earlier than tracer accumulation in the urinary bladder. This study aims to investigate whether early static PET acquisition increases detection rate of local recurrence on 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in comparison to PET imaging 60 min p.i.. METHODS: 203 consecutive PC patients with biochemical failure referred to 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT were analysed retrospectively (median prostate specific antigen (PSA) value: 1.44 ng/ml). In addition to whole-body PET/CT scans 60 min p.i., early static imaging of the pelvis was performed, starting at a median time of 283 s p.i. (range: 243-491 s). Assessment was based on visual analysis and calculation of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of pathologic lesions present in the pelvic area found on early PET imaging and on 60 min-PET scans. RESULTS: 26 patients (12.8%) were judged positive for LR on PET scans 60 min p.i. (median SUVmax: 10.8; range: 4.7-40.9), whereas 50 patients (24.6%) revealed a lesion suggestive of LR on early PET imaging (median SUVmax: 5.9; range: 2.9-17.6), resulting in a significant rise in detection rate (p < 0.001). Equivocal findings on PET scans 60 min p.i. decreased significantly with the help of early imaging (15.8% vs. 4.5% of patients; p < 0.001). Tracer activity in the urinary bladder with a median SUVmax of 8.2 was present in 63 patients on early PET scans (31.0%). However, acquisition starting time of early PET scans differed significantly in the patient groups with and without urinary bladder activity (median starting time of 321 vs. 275 s p.i.; range: 281-491 vs. 243-311 s p.i.; p < 0.001). Median SUVmax value of lesions suggestive of LR on early images was significantly higher in comparison to gluteal muscle, inguinal vessels and seminal vesicle/anastomosis (median SUVmax: 5.9 vs. 1.9, 4.0 and 2.4, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Performance of early imaging in 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in addition to whole-body scans 60 min p.i. increases the detection rate of local recurrence in PC patients with biochemical recurrence. Acquisition of early PET images should be started as early as 5 min p.i. in order to avoid disturbing tracer activity in the urinary bladder occuring at a later time point.
Entities:
Keywords:
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT; Biochemical relapse; Early PET imaging; Local recurrence; Prostate canceer
Authors: Pieter J De Visschere; Gert O De Meerleer; Jurgen J Fütterer; Geert M Villeirs Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Francesco Ceci; Christian Uprimny; Bernhard Nilica; Llanos Geraldo; Dorota Kendler; Alexander Kroiss; Jasmin Bektic; Wolfgang Horninger; Peter Lukas; Clemens Decristoforo; Paolo Castellucci; Stefano Fanti; Irene J Virgolini Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Lars Peter Sattler; Walter Mier; Boris A Hadaschik; Jürgen Debus; Tim Holland-Letz; Klaus Kopka; Uwe Haberkorn Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Martin T Freitag; Jan P Radtke; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Matthias C Roethke; Boris A Hadaschik; Martin Gleave; David Bonekamp; Klaus Kopka; Matthias Eder; Thorsten Heusser; Marc Kachelriess; Kathrin Wieczorek; Christos Sachpekidis; Paul Flechsig; Frederik Giesel; Markus Hohenfellner; Uwe Haberkorn; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-12-17 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Christian Uprimny; Alexander Stephan Kroiss; Clemens Decristoforo; Josef Fritz; Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Dorota Kendler; Lorenza Scarpa; Gianpaolo di Santo; Llanos Geraldo Roig; Johanna Maffey-Steffan; Wolfgang Horninger; Irene Johanna Virgolini Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Henrik Hetzheim; Wolfgang Kübler; Clemens Kratochwil; Frederik L Giesel; Thomas A Hope; Matthias Eder; Michael Eisenhut; Klaus Kopka; Uwe Haberkorn Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: A Afshar-Oromieh; A Malcher; M Eder; M Eisenhut; H G Linhart; B A Hadaschik; T Holland-Letz; F L Giesel; C Kratochwil; S Haufe; U Haberkorn; C M Zechmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-11-24 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: David Pfister; Michel Bolla; Alberto Briganti; Peter Carroll; Cesare Cozzarini; Steven Joniau; Hein van Poppel; Mack Roach; Andrew Stephenson; Thomas Wiegel; Michael J Zelefsky Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Florian Sterzing; Clemens Kratochwil; Hannah Fiedler; Sonja Katayama; Gregor Habl; Klaus Kopka; Ali Afshar-Oromieh; Jürgen Debus; Uwe Haberkorn; Frederik L Giesel Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Mark A Green; Gary D Hutchins; Clinton D Bahler; Mark Tann; Carla J Mathias; Wendy Territo; Justin Sims; Heather Polson; David Alexoff; William C Eckelman; Hank F Kung; James W Fletcher Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Christos Sachpekidis; Leyun Pan; Boris A Hadaschik; Klaus Kopka; Uwe Haberkorn; Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss Journal: Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-10-20
Authors: Christian Uprimny; Steffen Bayerschmidt; Alexander Stephan Kroiss; Josef Fritz; Bernhard Nilica; Anna Svirydenka; Clemens Decristoforo; Gianpaolo di Santo; Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Wolfgang Horninger; Irene Johanna Virgolini Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Alexander Heinzel; Dima Boghos; Felix M Mottaghy; Florian Gaertner; Markus Essler; Dirk von Mallek; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Christos Sachpekidis; A Afshar-Oromieh; K Kopka; D S Strauss; L Pan; U Haberkorn; A Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: M Hohberg; C Kobe; P Täger; J Hammes; M Schmidt; F Dietlein; M Wild; A Heidenreich; A Drzezga; M Dietlein Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Christian Uprimny; Steffen Bayerschmidt; Alexander Stephan Kroiss; Josef Fritz; Bernhard Nilica; Hanna Svirydenka; Clemens Decristoforo; Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Wolfgang Horninger; Irene Johanna Virgolini Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-03-12 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Sebastian Zschaeck; Fabian Lohaus; Marcus Beck; Gregor Habl; Stephanie Kroeze; Constantinos Zamboglou; Stefan Alexander Koerber; Jürgen Debus; Tobias Hölscher; Peter Wust; Ute Ganswindt; Alexander D J Baur; Klaus Zöphel; Nikola Cihoric; Matthias Guckenberger; Stephanie E Combs; Anca Ligia Grosu; Pirus Ghadjar; Claus Belka Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-05-11 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Andrew Barakat; Basel Yacoub; Maria El Homsi; Amro Saad Aldine; Albert El Hajj; Mohamad B Haidar Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-02-17 Impact factor: 4.379