Giuseppe Simone1,2, Giovanni Battista Di Pierro3, Rocco Papalia4, Rosa Sciuto5, Sandra Rea5, Mariaconsiglia Ferriero4, Salvatore Guaglianone4, Carlo Ludovico Maini5, Michele Gallucci4. 1. Department of Urology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy. puldet@gmail.com. 2. Department of Urology, "San Giovanni Bosco" Hospital, Turin, Italy. puldet@gmail.com. 3. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Urology, 'Sapienza' University, Rome, Italy. 4. Department of Urology, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy. 5. Department of Nuclear Medicine, "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To highlight a new imaging acquisition protocol during (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrence after RP. METHODS: A total of 146 patients with PSA levels between 0.2 and 1 ng/ml with negative conventional imaging who did not receive salvage treatment were prospectively enrolled. Imaging acquisition protocol included an early dynamic phase (1-8 min), a conventional whole body (10-20 min), and a late phase (30-40 min). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were measured. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of positive PET/CT. RESULTS: The median trigger PSA was 0.6 ng/ml (IQR 0.43-0.76). Median PSA doubling time (PSA DT) was 7.91 months (IQR 4.42-11.3); median PSA velocity (PSAV) was 0.02 ng/ml per month (IQR 0.02-0.04). Overall, (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT was positive in 111 of 146 patients (76 %). Out of 111 positive examinations, 80 (72.1 %) were positive only in the early dynamic phase. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 78.9, 76.9, 97.2, 26.3, and 78.7 %, respectively. At multivariable logistic regression, trigger PSA ≥ 0.6 ng/ml [odds ratio (OR) 3.13; p = 0.001] and PSAV ≥ 0.04 ng/ml per month (OR 4.95; p = 0.004) were independent predictors of positive PET/CT. The low NPV remains the main limitation of PET/CT in this setting of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The increased sensitivity, thanks to the early imaging acquisition protocol, makes (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT an attractive tool to detect prostate cancer recurrences in patients with a PSA level <1 ng/ml.
PURPOSE: To highlight a new imaging acquisition protocol during (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrence after RP. METHODS: A total of 146 patients with PSA levels between 0.2 and 1 ng/ml with negative conventional imaging who did not receive salvage treatment were prospectively enrolled. Imaging acquisition protocol included an early dynamic phase (1-8 min), a conventional whole body (10-20 min), and a late phase (30-40 min). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were measured. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of positive PET/CT. RESULTS: The median trigger PSA was 0.6 ng/ml (IQR 0.43-0.76). Median PSA doubling time (PSA DT) was 7.91 months (IQR 4.42-11.3); median PSA velocity (PSAV) was 0.02 ng/ml per month (IQR 0.02-0.04). Overall, (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT was positive in 111 of 146 patients (76 %). Out of 111 positive examinations, 80 (72.1 %) were positive only in the early dynamic phase. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 78.9, 76.9, 97.2, 26.3, and 78.7 %, respectively. At multivariable logistic regression, trigger PSA ≥ 0.6 ng/ml [odds ratio (OR) 3.13; p = 0.001] and PSAV ≥ 0.04 ng/ml per month (OR 4.95; p = 0.004) were independent predictors of positive PET/CT. The low NPV remains the main limitation of PET/CT in this setting of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The increased sensitivity, thanks to the early imaging acquisition protocol, makes (18)F-fluorocholine PET/CT an attractive tool to detect prostate cancer recurrences in patients with a PSA level <1 ng/ml.
Authors: Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Scott E Eggener; Peter T Scardino; Patrick C Walsh; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; Bruce J Trock; Zhaoyong Feng; David P Wood; James A Eastham; Ofer Yossepowitch; Danny M Rabah; Michael W Kattan; Changhong Yu; Eric A Klein; Andrew J Stephenson Journal: J Urol Date: 2011-01-15 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Nicolas Mottet; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo Van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filiberto Zattoni; Axel Heidenreich Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-01-25 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Vincenzo Scattoni; Marco Roscigno; Marco Raber; Francesco Montorsi; Luigi Da Pozzo; Giorgio Guazzoni; Massimo Freschi; Patrizio Rigatti Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: B J Krause; M Souvatzoglou; M Tuncel; K Herrmann; A K Buck; C Praus; T Schuster; H Geinitz; U Treiber; M Schwaiger Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-09-22 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Andrew J Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan; Thomas M Pisansky; Kevin M Slawin; Eric A Klein; Mitchell S Anscher; Jeff M Michalski; Howard M Sandler; Daniel W Lin; Jeffrey D Forman; Michael J Zelefsky; Larry L Kestin; Claus G Roehrborn; Charles N Catton; Theodore L DeWeese; Stanley L Liauw; Richard K Valicenti; Deborah A Kuban; Alan Pollack Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-05-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Christian Uprimny; Alexander Stephan Kroiss; Clemens Decristoforo; Josef Fritz; Boris Warwitz; Lorenza Scarpa; Llanos Geraldo Roig; Dorota Kendler; Elisabeth von Guggenberg; Jasmin Bektic; Wolfgang Horninger; Irene Johanna Virgolini Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 9.236