Literature DB >> 27899637

A genome wide dosage suppressor network reveals genomic robustness.

Biranchi Patra1, Yoshiko Kon2, Gitanjali Yadav1,3, Anthony W Sevold1, Jesse P Frumkin1, Ravishankar R Vallabhajosyula1, Arend Hintze1, Bjørn Østman1, Jory Schossau1, Ashish Bhan1, Bruz Marzolf4, Jenna K Tamashiro1, Amardeep Kaur4, Nitin S Baliga4, Elizabeth J Grayhack2, Christoph Adami1, David J Galas4, Alpan Raval1,5, Eric M Phizicky2, Animesh Ray6,7.   

Abstract

Genomic robustness is the extent to which an organism has evolved to withstand the effects of deleterious mutations. We explored the extent of genomic robustness in budding yeast by genome wide dosage suppressor analysis of 53 conditional lethal mutations in cell division cycle and RNA synthesis related genes, revealing 660 suppressor interactions of which 642 are novel. This collection has several distinctive features, including high co-occurrence of mutant-suppressor pairs within protein modules, highly correlated functions between the pairs and higher diversity of functions among the co-suppressors than previously observed. Dosage suppression of essential genes encoding RNA polymerase subunits and chromosome cohesion complex suggests a surprising degree of functional plasticity of macromolecular complexes, and the existence of numerous degenerate pathways for circumventing the effects of potentially lethal mutations. These results imply that organisms and cancer are likely able to exploit the genomic robustness properties, due the persistence of cryptic gene and pathway functions, to generate variation and adapt to selective pressures.
© The Author(s) 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27899637      PMCID: PMC5224485          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw1148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  79 in total

Review 1.  The RNA polymerase II machinery: structure illuminates function.

Authors:  Nancy A Woychik; Michael Hampsey
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-02-22       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Condensin association with histone H2A shapes mitotic chromosomes.

Authors:  Kenji Tada; Hiroaki Susumu; Takeshi Sakuno; Yoshinori Watanabe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Genetic properties influencing the evolvability of gene expression.

Authors:  Christian R Landry; Bernardo Lemos; Scott A Rifkin; W J Dickinson; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Evolvability.

Authors:  M Kirschner; J Gerhart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Mechanisms of suppression.

Authors:  P E Hartman; J R Roth
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 1.944

6.  Sex and deleterious mutation.

Authors:  A S Kondrashov
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-05-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Evolvability and hierarchy in rewired bacterial gene networks.

Authors:  Mark Isalan; Caroline Lemerle; Konstantinos Michalodimitrakis; Carsten Horn; Pedro Beltrao; Emanuele Raineri; Mireia Garriga-Canut; Luis Serrano
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Evolution of complex modular biological networks.

Authors:  Arend Hintze; Christoph Adami
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Meiotic condensin is required for proper chromosome compaction, SC assembly, and resolution of recombination-dependent chromosome linkages.

Authors:  Hong-Guo Yu; Douglas E Koshland
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2003-12-08       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Differential Stoichiometry among Core Ribosomal Proteins.

Authors:  Nikolai Slavov; Stefan Semrau; Edoardo Airoldi; Bogdan Budnik; Alexander van Oudenaarden
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 9.423

View more
  8 in total

1.  Mapping a diversity of genetic interactions in yeast.

Authors:  Jolanda van Leeuwen; Charles Boone; Brenda J Andrews
Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol       Date:  2017-08-12

Review 2.  Adapting to stress - chaperome networks in cancer.

Authors:  Suhasini Joshi; Tai Wang; Thaís L S Araujo; Sahil Sharma; Jeffrey L Brodsky; Gabriela Chiosis
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 3.  Mechanisms of suppression: The wiring of genetic resilience.

Authors:  Jolanda van Leeuwen; Carles Pons; Charles Boone; Brenda J Andrews
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 4.  Global Genetic Networks and the Genotype-to-Phenotype Relationship.

Authors:  Michael Costanzo; Elena Kuzmin; Jolanda van Leeuwen; Barbara Mair; Jason Moffat; Charles Boone; Brenda Andrews
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Genetic Network Complexity Shapes Background-Dependent Phenotypic Expression.

Authors:  Jing Hou; Jolanda van Leeuwen; Brenda J Andrews; Charles Boone
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Introns provide a platform for intergenic regulatory feedback of RPL22 paralogs in yeast.

Authors:  Kateřina Abrhámová; Filip Nemčko; Jiří Libus; Martin Převorovský; Martina Hálová; František Půta; Petr Folk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Genetic analysis of the Candida albicans biofilm transcription factor network using simple and complex haploinsufficiency.

Authors:  Virginia E Glazier; Thomas Murante; Daniel Murante; Kristy Koselny; Yuan Liu; Dongyeop Kim; Hyun Koo; Damian J Krysan
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 8.  Yeast genetic interaction screens in the age of CRISPR/Cas.

Authors:  Neil R Adames; Jenna E Gallegos; Jean Peccoud
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.886

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.