| Literature DB >> 27899436 |
Ali Karimi1, Mahmoud Rafieian-Kopaei1, Mohammad-Taghi Moradi2, Somayeh Alidadi3.
Abstract
This research was aimed to evaluate anti-herpes simplex virus type-1 (anti-HSV-1) activity of crude ethanol extract and 4 corresponding fractions of Quercus brantii acorn in vitro. Crude ethanol extract was prepared and subjected to fractionation with different polarity. Anti-HSV-1 activity was evaluated on baby hamster kidney cell line using MTT assay. The inhibitory effect of the plant materials on adsorption and/or post-adsorption stages of HSV-1 replication cycle were determined. Regression analysis was used to determine 50% inhibitory concentration and 50% cytotoxicity concentration, from which selective index was calculated. Based on our results, the chloroform fraction and the crude extract had the highest effect against HSV-1 with selectivity indices of 53.8 and 48.4, respectively. The n-hexane, n-butanol, and chloroform fractions inhibited HSV-1 replication in postadsorption stage ( P < .001). The results obtained indicated that the chloroform fraction of Q brantii acorn with high inhibitory effect against HSV-1 replication could be a new promising anti-HSV-1 agent.Entities:
Keywords: Quercus brantii; antiviral; herpes simplex virus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27899436 PMCID: PMC5871161 DOI: 10.1177/2156587216676421
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med ISSN: 2156-5899
Figure 1.Scheme of addition of extract/fractions in the adsorption and post-adsorption stages of herpes simplex virus type-1 (HSV-1).[33] Open and black arrows indicate the absence and presence of extract, respectively.
Total Phenolics, Flavonoid, and Flavonol Values of the Different Fractions of Quercus brantii Fruita
| Sample | Total Phenolicsb | Flavonoid Contentc | Flavonol Contentc |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crude extract | 201.6 ± 4.0 | 14.7 ± 2.2 | 33.6 ± 2.0 |
| 24.4 ± 3.5 | 16.8 ± 2 | 2.4 ± 0.5 | |
| Choloroform fraction | 222.5 ± 2.5 | 91.6 ± 1.5 | 105 ± 4.5 |
| 376.2 ± 7.1 | 22 ± 2 | 70.9 ± 55 | |
| Remaining aqueous fraction | 120 ± 3.5 | 5.8 ± 0.5 | 1.1 ± 0.4 |
|
| <.01 | <.01 | <.01 |
aAll results are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean of 3 assays.
bMilligrams gallic acid equivalent per gram of extract powder.
cMilligrams rutin equivalent per gram of extract powder.
Cell Cytotoxicity, Anti–Herpes Simplex Virus Type-1 Activity, and Selectivity Index of the Crude Extract and 4 Corresponding Fractions of Quercus brantii Fruit.a
| Extract | Cell Cytotoxicityb (CC50, μg/mL) | Antiviral Activityc (IC50, μg/mL) | Selectivity Indexd |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crude extract | 208 | 4.3 | 48.4 |
| >1000 | 120.5 | >8.3 | |
| Chloroform fraction | 156.1 | 2.9 | 53.8 |
| 112.5 | 3.8 | 29.6 | |
| Remaining aqueous fraction | 330 | 59 | 5.6 |
| Acyclovire | 177.5 | 1.3 | 136.5 |
aCell cytotoxicity effect and antiviral activity was determined by MTT assay.
bCC50 was the concentration that showed 50% cellular cytotoxic effect.
cIC50 was the concentration that inhibited 50% of HSV-1.
dSelectivity index is the ratio of CC50 to IC50.
eAcyclovir was included as positive control for the antiviral activity of HSV-1.
Figure 2.Cytotoxicity of crude ethanol extract and four corresponding fractions of Quercus brantii L acorn on baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells. Confluent BHK cells were exposed to different concentrations of crude ethyl alcohol extract and 4 fractions for 48 hours. Cytotoxicity was measured in MTT assay. Experiences were carried out in triplicate.
Figure 3.The effect of crud extract and the corresponding fractions of Quercus brantii fruit on the adsorption and postadsorption of herpes simplex virus type-1 (HSV-1) to the baby hamster kidney (BHK) cell. Data represent the percentage of virus inhibition compared with untreated control as mean ± SD (n = 3). One time 90% inhibitory concentration (IC90) was used for this experiment. Statistical analysis was done using statistical software with 1-way analysis of variance and the post hoc Tukey’s test. ***P < .001 adsorption versus postadsorption and throughout. **P < .05 adsorption versus postadsorption and throughout. *P < .05 throughout versus postadsorption and adsorption.