Jan Hourfar1,2, Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger3,4, Luisa Katharina Meißner4, Jörg Alexander Lisson5. 1. Orthodontic Practice, Reinheim, Germany. 2. Department of Orthodontics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 3. Orthodontic Practice, Tönisvorst, Germany. 4. Department of Orthodontics, Saarland University, Kirrberger Strasse 100, 66424, Homburg/Saar, Germany. 5. Department of Orthodontics, Saarland University, Kirrberger Strasse 100, 66424, Homburg/Saar, Germany. joerg.lisson@uniklinikum-saarland.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Aim of the study was the comparison of treatment effects upon pharyngeal depth in patients treated with either (1) S-II-appliance or (2) Activator. METHODS: Pre- and posttreatment lateral cephalograms of 73 patients were analyzed using a customized set of measurements. According to predefined criteria, patients were either treated with S-II-appliance or Activator. Pharyngeal depth was assessed from cranial to caudal at six levels (P1 to P6). Paired t tests were used for intragroup and t tests for independent samples for intergroup comparisons. Results were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: 37 (22 female, 15 male) patients were treated with the S-II-appliance (mean pretreatment age 11.1 ± 1.07 years), and 36 (20 female, 16 male) patients with an Activator (mean pretreatment age 11.3 ± 1.12 years). Mean treatment time was 14 months for the S-II-appliance and 12 months for the Activator. Most measurements at the different levels showed an average increase ranging from approximately 0.5 mm to almost 2 mm. Changes were more pronounced in S-II patients. In contrast to intergroup comparisons, some intragroup comparisons revealed statistically significant differences at levels P5 (p = 0.0062) and P6 (p = 0.0155) in S-II patients and at P1-level (p = 0.0197) in Activator patients. CONCLUSIONS: Both appliances similarly led to an increase of the pharyngeal depth. The sites of statistically significant changes differed.
OBJECTIVES: Aim of the study was the comparison of treatment effects upon pharyngeal depth in patients treated with either (1) S-II-appliance or (2) Activator. METHODS: Pre- and posttreatment lateral cephalograms of 73 patients were analyzed using a customized set of measurements. According to predefined criteria, patients were either treated with S-II-appliance or Activator. Pharyngeal depth was assessed from cranial to caudal at six levels (P1 to P6). Paired t tests were used for intragroup and t tests for independent samples for intergroup comparisons. Results were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: 37 (22 female, 15 male) patients were treated with the S-II-appliance (mean pretreatment age 11.1 ± 1.07 years), and 36 (20 female, 16 male) patients with an Activator (mean pretreatment age 11.3 ± 1.12 years). Mean treatment time was 14 months for the S-II-appliance and 12 months for the Activator. Most measurements at the different levels showed an average increase ranging from approximately 0.5 mm to almost 2 mm. Changes were more pronounced in S-IIpatients. In contrast to intergroup comparisons, some intragroup comparisons revealed statistically significant differences at levels P5 (p = 0.0062) and P6 (p = 0.0155) in S-IIpatients and at P1-level (p = 0.0197) in Activator patients. CONCLUSIONS: Both appliances similarly led to an increase of the pharyngeal depth. The sites of statistically significant changes differed.
Entities:
Keywords:
Activator; Angle Class II; Cephalometric study; Pharyngeal depth; S-II-Appliance