Literature DB >> 11062934

Current concepts on functional appliances and mandibular growth stimulation.

A R Collett.   

Abstract

The mode of action of functional appliances, particularly in relation to stimulating mandibular growth, is a controversial subject. Many of the reports concerning growth effects of functional appliances have been characterized by poor methodology. In assessing functional appliances, results from prospective randomized clinical trials should be given prominence. On the basis of available evidence, it cannot be concluded that functional appliances are effective in stimulating and increasing mandibular growth in the long term. Although favourable growth changes have been reported following phase 1 therapy, they are generally not substantial and long term stability appears to be poor.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11062934     DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2000.tb00553.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Dent J        ISSN: 0045-0421            Impact factor:   2.291


  5 in total

1.  Effects of two different functional appliances on root development of posterior teeth: activator vs. bite-jumping appliance.

Authors:  Gero Kinzinger; Susanna Savvaidis; Norbert Gülden; Björn Ludwig; Michael Knösel; Jörg Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Effects of two different removable functional appliances on depth of the posterior airway space : A retrospective cephalometric study.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Luisa Katharina Meißner; Jörg Alexander Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Effectiveness of bionator therapy for Class II malocclusions: a comparative long-term study.

Authors:  J Kochel; P Meyer-Marcotty; E Witt; A Stellzig-Eisenhauer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Class II treatment with fixed functional orthodontic appliances before and after the pubertal growth peak - a cephalometric study to evaluate differential therapeutic effects.

Authors:  Linda Frye; Peter R Diedrich; Gero S M Kinzinger
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 5.  Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Klaus Bsl Batista; Badri Thiruvenkatachari; Jayne E Harrison; Kevin D O'Brien
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.