Literature DB >> 2373450

[The modification of growth with the jumping-the-bite plate compared to other functional orthodontic appliances].

F G Sander1, C Lassak.   

Abstract

The bite-jumping-appliance BJA is a special functional appliance which affects the upper jaw comparably to activator headgear combinations (SNA angle). Concerning its influence on the lower jaw (SNB angle) the BJA can be compared with the Teuscher activator and the Klammt activator. The change in the inclination of the upper jaw (ANS-PNS to nasion-sella) proved to be negligible because the vector of the force passed through the center of resistance of the upper jaw. The extend of the dental influence was the largest with the activator, the smallest with the Fränkel II appliance. The inclination of the lower incisors (1 to gonion-menton) was hardly affected. The upper incisors were retruded however not be the same extend as with the Teuscher activator which even has torque springs (to avoid the retrusion). The treatment of all the patients ended in all cases excepting those that were treated with an activator in a nearly ideal IIW angle. Our findings encourage us to say that the BJA is an appliance with a far better working mechanism than the working mechanism of other functional appliances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2373450     DOI: 10.1007/bf02164567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop        ISSN: 0015-816X


  19 in total

1.  The class II malocclusion: differential diagnosis and clinical application of activators, extraoral traction, and fixed appliances.

Authors:  J P Pfeiffer; D Grobéty
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1975-11

2.  Cephalometric changes from activator-headgear treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion.

Authors:  E Kigele
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  1987-07

3.  A cephalometric, tomographic, and dental cast evaluation of Fränkel therapy.

Authors:  S D Hamilton; P M Sinclair; R H Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  [Biomechanical studies on the movement of the mandible in headgear activator treatment].

Authors:  F G Sander
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1985-08

5.  A cephalometric comparison of bony profile changes in Class II, division 1 patients treated with extraoral force and functional jaw orthopedics.

Authors:  C L Meach
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1966-05

6.  Effects of mandibular hyperpropulsion on the prechondroblastic zone of young rat condyle.

Authors:  J P Charlier; A Petrovic; J Herrmann-Stutzmann
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1969-01

7.  A growth-related concept for skeletal class II treatment.

Authors:  U Teuscher
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1978-09

8.  Dento-facial orthopaedics in the correction of class II malocclusion.

Authors:  N M Bass
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1982-01

9.  Effects of activator treatment--evidence for the occurrence of two different types of reaction.

Authors:  H U Luder
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  [Long-term results after activator treatment].

Authors:  E Schadlbauer
Journal:  Inf Orthod Kieferorthop       Date:  1984
View more
  10 in total

1.  An international comparison of early treatment of angle Class-II/1 cases. Skeletal effects of the first phase of a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  U Ehmer; C J Tulloch; W R Proffit; C Phillips
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Effects of two different functional appliances on root development of posterior teeth: activator vs. bite-jumping appliance.

Authors:  Gero Kinzinger; Susanna Savvaidis; Norbert Gülden; Björn Ludwig; Michael Knösel; Jörg Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  [The dental and skeletal changes in early Class II treatment with a Klammt open activator].

Authors:  L Eckardt; G Kanitz; W Harzer
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1995-11

4.  [The dental and skeletal effects of the jumping-the-bite plate and high-pull headgear combination. A clinical study of treated patients].

Authors:  A Wichelhaus; F G Sander
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1995-07

5.  Effects of two different removable functional appliances on depth of the posterior airway space : A retrospective cephalometric study.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Luisa Katharina Meißner; Jörg Alexander Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  [A retrospective evaluation of the treatment of skeletal Class-II with removable appliances].

Authors:  H Fischbach; B Kahl-Nieke
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1995-05

7.  [Can magnets or additional intermaxillary forces improve the mode of action of jumping-the-bite plates?].

Authors:  F G Sander; A Wichelhaus
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1994-12

8.  The Goettingen "Pro-Stab" removable plate system. A retrospective cephalometric study of the effects of a new Class II treatment appliance.

Authors:  A Jähnig; R Krysewski
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  [Skeletal and dental changes during the use of the bite-jumping plate. A cephalometric comparison with an untreated Class-II group].

Authors:  F G Sander; A Wichelhaus
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1995-05

10.  A prospective controlled evaluation of Class II division 1 malocclusions treated with fixed lingual mandibular growth modificator.

Authors:  Osama H Alali
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.079

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.