Literature DB >> 33449194

Pharyngeal airway and hyoid bone position changes of skeletal anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device and activator appliances.

Sinem İnce-Bingöl1, Burçak Kaya2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of miniplate anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device (MAF) and activator treatments in the pharyngeal airway dimensions and hyoid bone position.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with mandibular retrusion who were treated with either MAF or activator were selected retrospectively and compared with an untreated control group. The data of 114 lateral cephalograms, comprising those taken before treatment (T1) and at the end of functional treatment (T2), were evaluated with regard to their linear, angular, and area measurements.
RESULTS: The mandibular length increased and the hyoid bone moved forward with both treatments (P < 0.05). The horizontal change in the hyoid bone position with MAF treatment was correlated with changes in the point B and ANB angle. Increases of 1.8 mm, 1.4 mm, and 1.8 mm in the pharyngeal airway dimensions were obtained at the levels of the second, third, and fourth cervical vertebra, respectively, with the MAF treatment. On the other hand, an increase of 1.9 mm was found at the level of the fourth cervical vertebra with the activator treatment. The greatest vertical movement in the Menton and the highest increase in the oropharyngeal area were observed in the MAF group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Both the MAF and activator treatments caused favorable maxillomandibular changes; however, the MAF treatment provided a greater increase in the oropharyngeal area according to both the increase in mandibular length and the change in the vertical position of the mandible. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Functional appliances were found to be useful in increasing the pharyngeal airway dimensions in the short-term. The skeletal anchored fixed functional appliance caused a greater increase in the oropharyngeal airway area that may be beneficial for Class II patients who carry a risk of having respiratory problems.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Class II malocclusion; Hyoid bone; Obstructive sleep apnea; Pharyngeal airway; Skeletal anchorage

Year:  2021        PMID: 33449194     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-03789-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  22 in total

1.  Long-term effects of Class II Herbst treatment on the pharyngeal airway width.

Authors:  Christoph Drosen; Niko Christian Bock; Julia von Bremen; Hans Pancherz; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Effects of two different removable functional appliances on depth of the posterior airway space : A retrospective cephalometric study.

Authors:  Jan Hourfar; Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Luisa Katharina Meißner; Jörg Alexander Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Pharyngeal airway effects of Herbst and skeletal anchored Forsus FRD EZ appliances.

Authors:  Mevlut Celikoglu; Suleyman Kutalmis Buyuk; Abdullah Ekizer; Tuba Unal
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 1.675

4.  Changes in pharyngeal airway dimensions following incremental and maximum bite advancement during Herbst-rapid palatal expander appliance therapy in late adolescent and young adult patients: a randomized non-controlled prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Nisa Gul Amuk; Gokmen Kurt; Asli Baysal; Gokhan Turker
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Evaluation of airway dimensions and changes in hyoid bone position following class II functional therapy with activator.

Authors:  Cagri Ulusoy; Nehir Canigur Bavbek; Burcu Balos Tuncer; Cumhur Tuncer; Cagri Turkoz; Zeynep Gencturk
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  Changes in upper airway width associated with Class II treatments (headgear vs activator) and different growth patterns.

Authors:  Arnim Godt; Bernd Koos; Hanno Hagen; Gernot Göz
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Evaluation of the miniplate-anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in skeletal Class II growing subjects: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sherif A Elkordy; Amr M Abouelezz; Mona M S Fayed; Mai H Aboulfotouh; Yehya A Mostafa
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Changes in airway dimensions and hyoid bone position following class II correction with forsus fatigue resistant device.

Authors:  Nehir Canigur Bavbek; Burcu Balos Tuncer; Cagri Turkoz; Cagri Ulusoy; Cumhur Tuncer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Long-term pharyngeal airway changes after bionator treatment in adolescents with skeletal Class II malocclusions.

Authors:  Seimin Han; Yoon Jeong Choi; Chooryung J Chung; Ji Young Kim; Kyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 10.  Obstructive sleep disordered breathing in 2- to 18-year-old children: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Athanasios G Kaditis; Maria Luz Alonso Alvarez; An Boudewyns; Emmanouel I Alexopoulos; Refika Ersu; Koen Joosten; Helena Larramona; Silvia Miano; Indra Narang; Ha Trang; Marina Tsaoussoglou; Nele Vandenbussche; Maria Pia Villa; Dick Van Waardenburg; Silke Weber; Stijn Verhulst
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 16.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.