Jie Shen1,2, Yiling Wu3, Xiaoshuang Feng1,2, Fei Liang4, Miao Mo1,2, Binxin Cai3, Changming Zhou1,2, Zezhou Wang1,2, Meiying Zhu3, Guoxiang Cai2,5, Ying Zheng1,2. 1. Department of Cancer Prevention, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Noninfectious Chronic Disease Control and Prevention, Songjiang District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. 4. Department of Biostatistics, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. 5. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify people with high-risk early colorectal neoplasm is highly desirable for pre-selection in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in low-resource countries. We aim to build and validate a risk-based model so as to improve compliance and increase the benefits of screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using data from the Shanghai CRC screening cohort, we conducted a population-based nested case-control study to build a risk-based model. Cases of early colorectal neoplasm were extracted as colorectal adenomas and stage 0-I CRC. Each case was matched with five individuals without neoplasm (controls) by the screening site and year of enrollment. Cases and controls were then randomly divided into two groups, with two thirds for building the risk prediction model and the other one third for model validation. Known risk factors were included for risk prediction models using logistic regressions. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square statistics were used to evaluate model discrimination and calibration. The predicted individual risk probability was calculated under the risk regression equation. RESULTS: The model incorporating age, sex, family history and lifestyle factors including body mass index (BMI), smoking status, alcohol, regular moderate-to-intensity physical activity showed good calibration and discrimination. When the risk cutoff threshold was defined as 17%, the sensitivity and specificity of the model were 63.99% and 53.82%, respectively. The validation data analysis also showed well discrimination. CONCLUSION: A risk prediction model combining personal and lifestyle factors was developed and validated for high-risk early colorectal neoplasm among the Chinese population. This risk-based model could improve the pre-selection for screening and contribute a lot to efficient population-based screening in low-resource countries.
OBJECTIVE: To identify people with high-risk early colorectal neoplasm is highly desirable for pre-selection in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in low-resource countries. We aim to build and validate a risk-based model so as to improve compliance and increase the benefits of screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using data from the Shanghai CRC screening cohort, we conducted a population-based nested case-control study to build a risk-based model. Cases of early colorectal neoplasm were extracted as colorectal adenomas and stage 0-I CRC. Each case was matched with five individuals without neoplasm (controls) by the screening site and year of enrollment. Cases and controls were then randomly divided into two groups, with two thirds for building the risk prediction model and the other one third for model validation. Known risk factors were included for risk prediction models using logistic regressions. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square statistics were used to evaluate model discrimination and calibration. The predicted individual risk probability was calculated under the risk regression equation. RESULTS: The model incorporating age, sex, family history and lifestyle factors including body mass index (BMI), smoking status, alcohol, regular moderate-to-intensity physical activity showed good calibration and discrimination. When the risk cutoff threshold was defined as 17%, the sensitivity and specificity of the model were 63.99% and 53.82%, respectively. The validation data analysis also showed well discrimination. CONCLUSION: A risk prediction model combining personal and lifestyle factors was developed and validated for high-risk early colorectal neoplasm among the Chinese population. This risk-based model could improve the pre-selection for screening and contribute a lot to efficient population-based screening in low-resource countries.
Authors: Maite Betés; Miguel A Muñoz-Navas; José M Duque; Ramón Angós; Elena Macías; Jose C Súbtil; Maite Herraiz; Susana De La Riva; Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez; Miguel A Martínez-González Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Malcolm G Dunlop; Albert Tenesa; Susan M Farrington; Stephane Ballereau; David H Brewster; Thibaud Koessler; Paul Pharoah; Clemens Schafmayer; Jochen Hampe; Henry Völzke; Jenny Chang-Claude; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner; Susanna von Holst; Simone Picelli; Annika Lindblom; Mark A Jenkins; John L Hopper; Graham Casey; David Duggan; Polly A Newcomb; Anna Abulí; Xavier Bessa; Clara Ruiz-Ponte; Sergi Castellví-Bel; Iina Niittymäki; Sari Tuupanen; Auli Karhu; Lauri Aaltonen; Brent Zanke; Tom Hudson; Steven Gallinger; Ella Barclay; Lynn Martin; Maggie Gorman; Luis Carvajal-Carmona; Axel Walther; David Kerr; Steven Lubbe; Peter Broderick; Ian Chandler; Alan Pittman; Steven Penegar; Harry Campbell; Ian Tomlinson; Richard S Houlston Journal: Gut Date: 2012-04-05 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: David P Taylor; Gregory J Stoddard; Randall W Burt; Marc S Williams; Joyce A Mitchell; Peter J Haug; Lisa A Cannon-Albright Journal: Genet Med Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 8.822