Literature DB >> 27892991

Surveillance Mammography in Older Patients With Breast Cancer-Can We Ever Stop?: A Review.

Rachel A Freedman1, Nancy L Keating2, Ann H Partridge1, Hyman B Muss3, Arti Hurria4, Eric P Winer1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Approximately 4% to 5% of breast cancer survivors will develop a new ipsilateral or contralateral cancer (in-breast event) over the 5 years following diagnosis, and annual surveillance mammography is recommended for those with residual breast tissue. The risk for such in-breast events persists over time, though increasing age at cancer diagnosis and treatment with hormonal therapy are associated with lower risk, and most older survivors of breast cancer will ultimately die from nonbreast cancer-related causes. Specific guidelines for surveillance strategies in older patients are limited. Prospective data on the benefits and harms of surveillance mammography in this population are lacking, and most of the evidence is derived from observational, retrospective data, often in the general population. OBSERVATIONS: We review the current recommendations for breast cancer screening and surveillance for older patients, the current evidence for ipsilateral and contralateral breast cancer risks in older survivors of breast cancer, and suggested approaches for discussions about surveillance mammography with older patients. We recommend individualized decision making for surveillance breast imaging in older survivors of breast cancer, with consideration of the following strategy for women 70 years or older: 1-time imaging 6 to 12 months after completion of local therapy followed by annual or biennial surveillance mammography for healthy women and cessation of mammography in patients whose life expectancy is less than 5 years to 10 years, regardless of age. Decisions on mammographic surveillance should also incorporate whether hormonal therapy is being administered, whether a patient's anticipated life expectancy is extraordinary, and whether a patient's individual risk for in-breast events is higher (or lower) than average risk for breast cancer survivors. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We propose reframing discussions around surveillance mammography in older breast cancer survivors and to consider cessation while taking into account life expectancy, the estimated risk for subsequent in-breast events, and patient preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27892991      PMCID: PMC5540165          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  50 in total

1.  Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hubbard; Karla Kerlikowske; Chris I Flowers; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Weiwei Zhu; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Continuing risk of ipsilateral breast relapse after breast-conserving therapy at long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Bas Kreike; Augustinus A M Hart; Tony van de Velde; Jacques Borger; Hans Peterse; Emiel Rutgers; Harry Bartelink; Marc J van de Vijver
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Breast Cancer Mortality After a Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

Authors:  Steven A Narod; Javaid Iqbal; Vasily Giannakeas; Victoria Sopik; Ping Sun
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 4.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Durado Brooks; Debbie Saslow; Otis W Brawley
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Effect of age and comorbidity in postmenopausal breast cancer patients aged 55 years and older.

Authors:  R Yancik; M N Wesley; L A Ries; R J Havlik; B K Edwards; J W Yates
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-02-21       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Declining incidence of contralateral breast cancer in the United States from 1975 to 2006.

Authors:  Hazel B Nichols; Amy Berrington de González; James V Lacey; Philip S Rosenberg; William F Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy for invasive breast cancer: high incidence in young patients and association with poor survival.

Authors:  P H Elkhuizen; M J van de Vijver; J Hermans; H M Zonderland; C J van de Velde; J W Leer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 8.  A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions.

Authors:  Lydia E Pace; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 10-year analysis of the ATAC trial.

Authors:  Jack Cuzick; Ivana Sestak; Michael Baum; Aman Buzdar; Anthony Howell; Mitch Dowsett; John F Forbes
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening replies to Michael Baum.

Authors:  Michael Marmot; G Altman; D A Cameron; J A Dewar; S G Thompson; Maggie Wilcox
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-02-13
View more
  5 in total

1.  Use of Surveillance Mammography Among Older Breast Cancer Survivors by Life Expectancy.

Authors:  Rachel A Freedman; Nancy L Keating; Lydia E Pace; Joyce Lii; Ellen P McCarthy; Mara A Schonberg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Adjuvant Treatment of Elderly Breast Cancer Patients: Offer the Best Chances of Cure.

Authors:  Spyridon Marinopoulos; Constantine Dimitrakakis; Andreas Kalampalikis; Flora Zagouri; Angeliki Andrikopoulou; Alexandros Rodolakis
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  Individualizing Surveillance Mammography for Older Patients After Treatment for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Multidisciplinary Expert Panel and International Society of Geriatric Oncology Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Rachel A Freedman; Christina A Minami; Eric P Winer; Monica Morrow; Alexander K Smith; Louise C Walter; Mina S Sedrak; Haley Gagnon; Adriana Perilla-Glen; Hans Wildiers; Tanya M Wildes; Stuart M Lichtman; Kah Poh Loh; Etienne G C Brain; Pamela S Ganschow; Kelly K Hunt; Deborah K Mayer; Kathryn J Ruddy; Reshma Jagsi; Nancy U Lin; Beverly Canin; Barbara K LeStage; Anna C Revette; Mara A Schonberg; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 33.006

4.  Acceptability of a companion patient guide to support expert consensus guidelines on surveillance mammography in older breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Rachel A Freedman; Anna C Revette; Haley Gagnon; Adriana Perilla-Glen; Molly Kokoski; Saida O Hussein; Erin Leone; Nicole Hixon; Rebeka Lovato; Wendy Loeser; Nancy U Lin; Christina A Minami; Beverly Canin; Barbara LeStage; Meredith Faggen; Philip D Poorvu; Jennifer McKenna; Kathryn J Ruddy; Nancy L Keating; Mara A Schonberg
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.624

5.  Adherence to the Dutch Breast Cancer Guidelines for Surveillance in Breast Cancer Survivors: Real-World Data from a Pooled Multicenter Analysis.

Authors:  Teresa Draeger; Vinzenz Voelkel; Kay Schreuder; Jeroen Veltman; Anneriet Dassen; Luc Strobbe; Harald J Heijmans; Ron Koelemij; Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn; Sabine Siesling
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 5.837

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.