Literature DB >> 18234444

Continuing risk of ipsilateral breast relapse after breast-conserving therapy at long-term follow-up.

Bas Kreike1, Augustinus A M Hart, Tony van de Velde, Jacques Borger, Hans Peterse, Emiel Rutgers, Harry Bartelink, Marc J van de Vijver.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Currently, the local treatment of most patients with early invasive breast cancer consists of breast-conserving therapy (BCT). We have previously reported on the risk factors for ipsilateral breast relapse (IBR) in 1,026 patients treated with BCT after a median follow-up of 5.5 years. In the present study, we evaluated the IBR incidence and the risk factors for IBR after prolonged follow-up. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We updated the disease outcome for all 1,026 patients using the clinical information collected from the medical registration of The Netherlands Cancer Institute and performed step-wise proportional hazard Cox regression analysis to identify the risk factors associated with an increased risk of IBR after BCT at long-term follow-up.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 13.3 years, 114 patients had developed an IBR as the first event. The IBR rate was 9.3% and 13.8%, respectively, at 10 and 15 years. Also, the increase in IBR was continuous without reaching a plateau, even after 15 years. Univariate analysis showed that involved surgical resection margins, young age, vascular invasion, and the presence and quantity of an in situ component are risk factors for IBR. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor-positive surgical resection margins (hazard ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-5.2, p = 0.0002) or the presence of vascular invasion (hazard ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.2, p = 0.004) is the major independent risk factor for IBR.
CONCLUSIONS: The data from long-term follow-up showed a constant increase in IBR among patients treated by BCT, even after 15 years, without reaching a plateau. Involved surgical resection margins and vascular invasion were the most important risk factors for IBR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18234444     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.11.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  21 in total

Review 1.  What is a clear margin in breast conserving cancer surgery?

Authors:  Helen Krontiras; Rachael B Lancaster; Marshall M Urist
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2014-03

2.  Breast-Conserving Therapy in Patients with cT3 Breast Cancer with Good Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy Results in Excellent Local Control: A Comprehensive Cancer Center Experience.

Authors:  Marieke E M van der Noordaa; Ileana Ioan; Emiel J Rutgers; Erik van Werkhoven; Claudette E Loo; Rosie Voorthuis; Jelle Wesseling; Japke van Urk; Terry Wiersma; Vincent Dezentje; Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters; Frederieke H van Duijnhoven
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Efficacy of intraoperative entire-circumferential frozen section analysis of lumpectomy margins during breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  Tomofumi Osako; Reiki Nishimura; Yasuyuki Nishiyama; Yasuhiro Okumura; Rumiko Tashima; Masahiro Nakano; Mamiko Fujisue; Yasuo Toyozumi; Nobuyuki Arima
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Is breast-conserving therapy adequate in BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers? The radiation oncologist's point of view.

Authors:  Alexis Vallard; Nicolas Magné; Jean-Baptiste Guy; Sophie Espenel; Chloé Rancoule; Peng Diao; Eric Deutsch; Sofia Rivera; Cyrus Chargari
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Impact of margin assessment method on positive margin rate and total volume excised.

Authors:  Tracy-Ann Moo; Lydia Choi; Candice Culpepper; Cristina Olcese; Alexandra Heerdt; Lisa Sclafani; Tari A King; Anne S Reiner; Sujata Patil; Edi Brogi; Monica Morrow; Kimberly J Van Zee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Safe negative margin width in breast conservative therapy: results from a population with a high percentage of negative prognostic factors.

Authors:  Abu Bakar Bhatti; Amina Khan; Narjis Muzaffar; Neelam Siddiqui; Aamir Syed; Mazhar Shah; Awais Aamir; Arif Jamshed
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The association of surgical margins and local recurrence in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Petra Macaskill; M Luke Marinovich; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Long-term results after 12-year follow-up of patients treated with whole-breast and boost irradiation after breast-conserving surgery.

Authors:  Shigeo Takahashi; Yuji Murakami; Nobuki Imano; Yuko Kaneyasu; Yoshiko Doi; Masahiro Kenjo; Tomoki Kimura; Takayuki Kadoya; Koji Arihiro; Tsuyoshi Kataoka; Morihito Okada; Yasushi Nagata
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.374

9.  Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2009.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; J N Ingle; R D Gelber; A S Coates; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 10.  Obtaining adequate surgical margins in breast-conserving therapy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: current modalities and future directions.

Authors:  Rick G Pleijhuis; Maurits Graafland; Jakob de Vries; Joost Bart; Johannes S de Jong; Gooitzen M van Dam
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.