Literature DB >> 27892827

Rationale, Procedures, and Response Rates for the 2015 Administration of NCI's Health Information National Trends Survey: HINTS-FDA 2015.

Kelly D Blake1, David B Portnoy2, Annette R Kaufman3, Chung-Tung Jordan Lin4, Serena C Lo4, Eric Backlund2, David Cantor5, Lloyd Hicks5, Amy Lin5, Andrew Caporaso5, Terisa Davis5, Richard P Moser6, Bradford W Hesse1.   

Abstract

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) developed the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) to monitor population trends in cancer communication practices, information preferences, health risk behaviors, attitudes, and cancer knowledge. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recognized HINTS as a unique data resource for informing its health communication endeavors and partnered with NCI to field HINTS-FDA 2015. HINTS-FDA 2015 was a self-administered paper instrument sent by mail May 29 to September 8, 2015, using a random probability-based sample of U.S. postal addresses stratified by county-level smoking rates, with an oversampling of high and medium-high smoking strata to increase the yield of current smokers responding to the survey. The response rate for HINTS-FDA 2015 was 33% (N = 3,738). The yield of current smokers (n = 495) was lower than expected, but the sampling strategy achieved the goal of obtaining more former smokers (n = 1,132). Public-use HINTS-FDA 2015 data and supporting documentation have been available for download and secondary data analyses since June 2016 at http://hints.cancer.gov . NCI and FDA encourage the use of HINTS-FDA for health communication research and practice related to tobacco-related communications, public knowledge, and behaviors as well as beliefs and actions related to medical products and dietary supplements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27892827      PMCID: PMC5141516          DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1242672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  12 in total

Review 1.  The role of Internet resources in clinical oncology: promises and challenges.

Authors:  Bradford W Hesse; Alexandra J Greenberg; Lila J Finney Rutten
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Is Online Health Activity Alive and Well or Flatlining? Findings From 10 Years of the Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Abby Prestin; Sana N Vieux; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2015-06-04

3.  Perceptions of cancer controllability and cancer risk knowledge: the moderating role of race, ethnicity, and acculturation.

Authors:  A Susana Ramírez; Lila J Finney Rutten; April Oh; Bryan Leyva Vengoechea; Richard P Moser; Robin C Vanderpool; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Picking up the pace: changes in method and frame for the health information national trends survey (2011-2014).

Authors:  Lila J Finney Rutten; Terisa Davis; Ellen Burke Beckjord; Kelly Blake; Richard P Moser; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2012

5.  A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non-response.

Authors:  Rebecca R Andridge; Roderick J A Little
Journal:  Int Stat Rev       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): development, design, and dissemination.

Authors:  David E Nelson; Gary L Kreps; Bradford W Hesse; Robert T Croyle; Gordon Willis; Neeraj K Arora; Barbara K Rimer; K V Viswanath; Neil Weinstein; Sara Alden
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

7.  Deeming Tobacco Products To Be Subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as Amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act; Restrictions on the Sale and Distribution of Tobacco Products and Required Warning Statements for Tobacco Products. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2016-05-10

8.  Fatalistic cancer beliefs and information sources among rural and urban adults in the USA.

Authors:  Christie A Befort; Niaman Nazir; Kimberly Engelman; Won Choi
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Understanding the Tobacco Control Act: efforts by the US Food and Drug Administration to make tobacco-related morbidity and mortality part of the USA's past, not its future.

Authors:  Corinne G Husten; Lawrence R Deyton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-05-04       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Social media use in the United States: implications for health communication.

Authors:  Wen-ying Sylvia Chou; Yvonne M Hunt; Ellen Burke Beckjord; Richard P Moser; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  18 in total

1.  Nicotine and addiction beliefs and perceptions among the US-born and foreign-born populations.

Authors:  Anh B Nguyen; Xiaoquan Zhao; Leah Hoffman; Aura Lee Morse; Janine Delahanty
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Trust in national health information sources in the United States: comparing predictors and levels of trust across three health domains.

Authors:  Emily B Peterson; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Dannielle E Kelley; Brad Hesse
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Assessment of eHealth behaviors in national surveys: a systematic review of instruments.

Authors:  Y Alicia Hong; Jinmyoung Cho
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Item Development and Performance of Tobacco Product and Regulation Perception Items for the Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Emily B Peterson; David B Portnoy; Kelly D Blake; Gordon Willis; Katy Trundle; Andrew R Caporaso; Aaron Maitland; Annette R Kaufman
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Criterion validity of measures of perceived relative harm of e-cigarettes and smokeless tobacco compared to cigarettes.

Authors:  Alexander Persoskie; Anh B Nguyen; Annette R Kaufman; Cindy Tworek
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Monitoring harm perceptions of smokeless tobacco products among U.S. adults: Health Information National Trends Survey 2012, 2014, 2015.

Authors:  Shari P Feirman; Elisabeth A Donaldson; Mark Parascandola; Kimberly Snyder; Cindy Tworek
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Online Health Information Seeking Among US Adults: Measuring Progress Toward a Healthy People 2020 Objective.

Authors:  Lila J Finney Rutten; Kelly D Blake; Alexandra J Greenberg-Worisek; Summer V Allen; Richard P Moser; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  US adult tobacco users' absolute harm perceptions of traditional and alternative tobacco products, information-seeking behaviors, and (mis)beliefs about chemicals in tobacco products.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bernat; Rebecca A Ferrer; Katherine A Margolis; Kelly D Blake
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  Beliefs about FDA tobacco regulation, modifiability of cancer risk, and tobacco product comparative harm perceptions: Findings from the HINTS-FDA 2015.

Authors:  Anh B Nguyen; James Henrie; Wendy I Slavit; Annette R Kaufman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  US Adult Interest in Less Harmful and Less Addictive Hypothetical Modified Risk Tobacco Products.

Authors:  Erin Keely O'Brien; Alexander Persoskie; Mark Parascandola; Allison C Hoffman
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.