Literature DB >> 26042588

Is Online Health Activity Alive and Well or Flatlining? Findings From 10 Years of the Health Information National Trends Survey.

Abby Prestin1, Sana N Vieux, Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou.   

Abstract

The Internet increasingly enables diverse health communication activities, from information seeking to social media interaction. Up-to-date reporting is needed to document the national prevalence, trends, and user profiles of online health activities so that these technologies can be best used in health communication efforts. This study identifies prevalence, trend, and factors associated with seeking health information, e-mailing health care providers, and using social media for health purposes. Four iterations of HINTS survey data, collected in 2003, 2005, 2008, and 2012, were analyzed to assess population-level trends over the last decade, and current prevalence of Internet-based health communication activities. Sociodemographic and health correlates were explored through weighted logistic regression modeling. Findings demonstrated that Internet use has steadily increased, with 78% of U.S. adults online in 2012; however several digital divide factors--among them education, age, and race/ethnicity--still predict access. Once online, 70% of adults use the Internet as their first source for health information, and while 19% have e-mailed health care providers, engagement in health communication on social media is still relatively low. Distinct user profiles characterize each type of communication, with age, population density, and gender emerging as important predictors across online health activities. These findings have important implications for health communication research and practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26042588     DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1018590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  32 in total

1.  Design cues for tobacco communication: Heuristic interpretations and usability of online health information about harmful chemicals.

Authors:  Allison J Lazard
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Websites on Bladder Cancer: an Appropriate Source of Patient Information?

Authors:  Johannes Salem; Pia Paffenholz; Christian Bolenz; Melanie von Brandenstein; Angelika Cebulla; Axel Haferkamp; Timur Kuru; Cheryl T Lee; David Pfister; Igor Tsaur; Hendrik Borgmann; Axel Heidenreich
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Assessing gender identity differences in cardiovascular disease in US adults: an analysis of data from the 2014-2017 BRFSS.

Authors:  Billy A Caceres; Kasey B Jackman; Donald Edmondson; Walter O Bockting
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2019-09-26

Review 4.  The role of Internet resources in clinical oncology: promises and challenges.

Authors:  Bradford W Hesse; Alexandra J Greenberg; Lila J Finney Rutten
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Trends of online patient-provider communication among cancer survivors from 2008 to 2017: a digital divide perspective.

Authors:  Shaohai Jiang; Y Alicia Hong; Piper Liping Liu
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 4.442

6.  Consulting "Dr. YouTube": an objective evaluation of hypospadias videos on a popular video-sharing website.

Authors:  Amr Salama; Janet Panoch; Elhaam Bandali; Aaron Carroll; Sarah Wiehe; Stephen Downs; Mark P Cain; Richard Frankel; Katherine H Chan
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 1.830

7.  Most National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center Websites Do Not Provide Survivors with Information About Cancer Rehabilitation Services.

Authors:  Julie K Silver; Vishwa S Raj; Jack B Fu; Eric M Wisotzky; Sean Robinson Smith; Sasha E Knowlton; Alexander J Silver
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Implications of social media use on health information technology engagement: Data from HINTS 4 cycle 3.

Authors:  Devlon N Jackson; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Kisha I Coa; April Oh; Bradford Hesse
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Rationale, Procedures, and Response Rates for the 2015 Administration of NCI's Health Information National Trends Survey: HINTS-FDA 2015.

Authors:  Kelly D Blake; David B Portnoy; Annette R Kaufman; Chung-Tung Jordan Lin; Serena C Lo; Eric Backlund; David Cantor; Lloyd Hicks; Amy Lin; Andrew Caporaso; Terisa Davis; Richard P Moser; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2016-11-28

10.  Communication About Health Information Technology Use Between Patients and Providers.

Authors:  Joy L Lee; Susan M Rawl; Stephanie Dickinson; Evgenia Teal; Layla B Baker; Chen Lyu; Will L Tarver; David A Haggstrom
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.