Literature DB >> 29059364

US Adult Interest in Less Harmful and Less Addictive Hypothetical Modified Risk Tobacco Products.

Erin Keely O'Brien1, Alexander Persoskie1, Mark Parascandola2, Allison C Hoffman1.   

Abstract

Introduction: Tobacco companies have a history of making health claims about their new products. Such claims are now regulated by the US Food and Drug Administration. We examined consumer interest in hypothetical modified risk tobacco products (MRTPs) among current, former, and never established smokers and examined whether interest was associated with beliefs about tobacco and cancer.
Methods: Data were analyzed from the US nationally representative 2015 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS-FDA 2015; N = 3738). Interest in hypothetical MRTPs was assessed by asking participants their likelihood of using tobacco products claiming to be less addictive and less harmful than other products.
Results: About half of current smokers and a tenth of both former and never smokers reported they were "somewhat" or "very" likely to try hypothetical MRTPs claiming to be less harmful or less addictive. Female smokers, former smokers with lower smoking harm perceptions, and never smokers who are young adults or without college education expressed more interest in these products. Interest in using these products was positively associated with believing that smoking status is a changeable individual characteristic and that it is possible for tobacco products to be made without some harmful chemicals.
Conclusion: We identified several subgroups of current, former, and never smokers who may be particularly affected by the marketing of MRTPs and therefore important to study to inform models of the potential population health impact of authorizing the marketing of MRTPs. Implications: Findings about interest in hypothetical MRTPs can inform models of how the marketing of MRTPs could affect population health. Understanding which subgroups are particularly interested in MRTPs can help determine who might be important to study to inform these models. We identified several groups who may warrant specific attention: smokers who are female, former smokers who hold low harm perceptions of smoking, never smokers who are young adults or have a high school education or less, people who believe that smoking is a changeable individual characteristic, and people who believe that it is possible to make low chemical tobacco products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29059364      PMCID: PMC6154985          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntx227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  18 in total

Review 1.  The dark side of marketing seemingly "Light" cigarettes: successful images and failed fact.

Authors:  R W Pollay; T Dewhirst
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Optimistic bias in adolescent and adult smokers and nonsmokers.

Authors:  J J Arnett
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Smoker and ex-smoker reactions to cigarettes claiming reduced risk.

Authors:  S Shiffman; J L Pillitteri; S L Burton; M E Di Marino
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Smokers' responses to advertisements for regular and light cigarettes and potential reduced-exposure tobacco products.

Authors:  William L Hamilton; Giulia diStefano Norton; Tammy K Ouellette; Wiliam M Rhodes; Ryan Kling; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Findings and implications from a national study on potential reduced exposure products (PREPs).

Authors:  Lisa M Hund; Matthew C Farrelly; Jane A Allen; Rosaleen H Chou; Ann W St Claire; Donna M Vallone; Cheryl G Healton
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.244

6.  Adult interest in using a hypothetical modified risk tobacco product: findings from wave 1 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study (2013-14).

Authors:  Jennifer L Pearson; Amanda L Johnson; Sarah E Johnson; Cassandra A Stanton; Andrea C Villanti; Raymond S Niaura; Allison M Glasser; Baoguang Wang; David B Abrams; K Michael Cummings; Andrew Hyland
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  Smoker awareness of and beliefs about supposedly less-harmful tobacco products.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; Andrew Hyland; Gary A Giovino; Geoffrey T Fong; K Michael Cummings
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Rationale, Procedures, and Response Rates for the 2015 Administration of NCI's Health Information National Trends Survey: HINTS-FDA 2015.

Authors:  Kelly D Blake; David B Portnoy; Annette R Kaufman; Chung-Tung Jordan Lin; Serena C Lo; Eric Backlund; David Cantor; Lloyd Hicks; Amy Lin; Andrew Caporaso; Terisa Davis; Richard P Moser; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2016-11-28

9.  Tobacco harm reduction and the evolution of nicotine dependence.

Authors:  Mark Parascandola
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Fatalistic beliefs about cancer prevention and three prevention behaviors.

Authors:  Jeff Niederdeppe; Andrea Gurmankin Levy
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  4 in total

1.  Exposure to e-cigarette health claims and association with e-cigarette use and risk perceptions: A cohort study of young adults.

Authors:  Kimberly G Wagoner; Beth A Reboussin; Jennifer Cornacchione Ross; Rachel Denlinger-Apte; John Spangler; Erin L Sutfin
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 4.591

2.  Smokers' Exposure to Perceived Modified Risk Claims for E-Cigarettes, Snus, and Smokeless Tobacco in the United States.

Authors:  Olivia A Wackowski; Richard J O'Connor; Jennifer L Pearson
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Harm Perceptions and Beliefs about Potential Modified Risk Tobacco Products.

Authors:  Jennifer C Morgan; Joseph N Cappella
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Smokers' and Young Adult Non-Smokers' Perceptions and Perceived Impact of Snus and E-Cigarette Modified Risk Messages.

Authors:  Olivia A Wackowski; Mariam Rashid; Kathryn L Greene; M Jane Lewis; Richard J O'Connor
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.