Literature DB >> 31513756

Online Health Information Seeking Among US Adults: Measuring Progress Toward a Healthy People 2020 Objective.

Lila J Finney Rutten1, Kelly D Blake2, Alexandra J Greenberg-Worisek1, Summer V Allen3, Richard P Moser2, Bradford W Hesse2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: During the past decade, the availability of health information online has increased dramatically. We assessed progress toward the Healthy People 2020 (HP2020) health communication and health information technology objective of increasing the proportion of health information seekers who easily access health information online.
METHODS: We used data from 4 administrations of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2008-2017) (N = 18 103). We conducted multivariable logistic regression analysis to evaluate trends over time in experiences with accessing health information and to examine differences by sociodemographic variables (sex, age, race/ethnicity, education, income, metropolitan status) separately for those who used the internet (vs other information sources) during their most recent search for health information.
RESULTS: Among US adults who looked for health information and used the internet for their most recent search, the percentage who reported accessing health information without frustration was stable during the study period (from 37.2% in 2008 to 38.5% in 2017). Accessing information online without frustration was significantly and independently associated with age 35-49 (vs age 18-34) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 -1.73), non-Hispanic black (vs non-Hispanic white) race/ethnicity (OR = 2.15; 95% CI, 1.55-2.97), and annual household income <$20 000 (vs >$75 000) (OR = 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.93). The percentage of adults who used an information source other than the internet and reported accessing health information online without frustration ranged from 31.3% in 2008 to 42.7% in 2017. Survey year 2017 (vs 2008) (OR = 1.61; 95% CI, 1.09-2.35) and high school graduate education (vs college graduate) (OR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.97) were significantly and independently associated with accessing health information without frustration from sources other than the internet.
CONCLUSIONS: The percentage of online health information seekers reporting easily accessing health information did not meet the HP2020 objective. Continued efforts are needed to enable easy access to online health information among diverse populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healthy People programs; access to information; frustration; health communication; internet

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31513756      PMCID: PMC6832079          DOI: 10.1177/0033354919874074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  33 in total

1.  The Internet as a health information source: findings from the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey and implications for health communication.

Authors:  Susan Koch-Weser; Ylisabyth S Bradshaw; Lisa Gualtieri; Susan S Gallagher
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2010

Review 2.  Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980-2003).

Authors:  Lila J Finney Rutten; Neeraj K Arora; Alexis D Bakos; Noreen Aziz; Julia Rowland
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-06

Review 3.  Quality of patient health information on the Internet: reviewing a complex and evolving landscape.

Authors:  Eamonn Fahy; Rohan Hardikar; Adrian Fox; Sean Mackay
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2014-01-31

4.  Rationale, Procedures, and Response Rates for the 2015 Administration of NCI's Health Information National Trends Survey: HINTS-FDA 2015.

Authors:  Kelly D Blake; David B Portnoy; Annette R Kaufman; Chung-Tung Jordan Lin; Serena C Lo; Eric Backlund; David Cantor; Lloyd Hicks; Amy Lin; Andrew Caporaso; Terisa Davis; Richard P Moser; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2016-11-28

5.  Using collaborative web technology to construct the health information national trends survey.

Authors:  Richard P Moser; Ellen Burke Beckjord; Lila J Finney Rutten; Kelly Blake; Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2012

6.  Health information-seeking in the digital age.

Authors:  Christine Percheski; Eszter Hargittai
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2011

7.  The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): development, design, and dissemination.

Authors:  David E Nelson; Gary L Kreps; Bradford W Hesse; Robert T Croyle; Gordon Willis; Neeraj K Arora; Barbara K Rimer; K V Viswanath; Neil Weinstein; Sara Alden
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

8.  Gender Differences in Searching for Health Information on the Internet and the Virtual Patient-Physician Relationship in Germany: Exploratory Results on How Men and Women Differ and Why.

Authors:  Sonja Bidmon; Ralf Terlutter
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 9.  Cause and effect: the linkage between the health information seeking behavior and the online environment--a review.

Authors:  R Bratucu; I R Gheorghe; R M Purcarea; C M Gheorghe; O Popa Velea; V L Purcarea
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2014-09-25

10.  Predictors of eHealth usage: insights on the digital divide from the Health Information National Trends Survey 2012.

Authors:  Emily Kontos; Kelly D Blake; Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou; Abby Prestin
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  27 in total

1.  Online Health Information-Seeking Behavior Among Korean American Immigrants in Rural Alabama: Dose Discrimination Matter?

Authors:  Hee Yun Lee; Zhichao Hao; Eun Young Choi
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2021-11-27

Review 2.  YouTube as a source of information on pediatric scoliosis: a reliability and educational quality analysis.

Authors:  Samuel S Rudisill; Nour Z Saleh; Alexander L Hornung; Shadi Zbeidi; Roohi M Ali; Zakariah K Siyaji; Junyoung Ahn; Michael T Nolte; Gregory D Lopez; Arash J Sayari
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-08-20

3.  Assessment of Online Patient Education Material About Dysphagia.

Authors:  Sarah M Steiner; Bonnie K Slavych; Richard I Zraick
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 2.733

4.  The Chain Mediating Effect of the Public's Online Health Information-Seeking Behavior on Doctor-Patient Interaction.

Authors:  Aijing Luo; Zhen Yu; Fei Liu; Wenzhao Xie
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-02

5.  Online information on medical cannabis is not always aligned with scientific evidence and may raise unrealistic expectations.

Authors:  Arthur Cassa Macedo; André Oliveira Vilela de Faria; Isabella Bizzi; Fabrício A Moreira; Alessandro Colasanti; Pietro Ghezzi
Journal:  J Cannabis Res       Date:  2022-07-11

6.  mHealth Interventions for Contraceptive Behavior Change in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alice F Cartwright; Amy Alspaugh; Laura E Britton; Seth M Noar
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2022-03-08

7.  Communication About Health Information Technology Use Between Patients and Providers.

Authors:  Joy L Lee; Susan M Rawl; Stephanie Dickinson; Evgenia Teal; Layla B Baker; Chen Lyu; Will L Tarver; David A Haggstrom
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Patients' Understanding of Oncology Clinical Endpoints: Environmental Scan and Focus Groups.

Authors:  Helen W Sullivan; Amie C O'Donoghue; Kate Ferriola-Bruckenstein; Janice P Tzeng; Vanessa Boudewyns
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-08-27

Review 9.  Riding the Wave of Digital Transformation in Behavioral Medicine.

Authors:  Bradford W Hesse
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2020-12-01

10.  YouTube as a Source of Information and Education on Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Kyong No Lee; Ga Hyun Son; Sung Ho Park; Youngmi Kim; Sung Taek Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.