Literature DB >> 27891813

Geographic variation in genetic and demographic performance: new insights from an old biogeographical paradigm.

Samuel Pironon1, Guillaume Papuga2,3, Jesús Villellas4, Amy L Angert5, María B García1, John D Thompson2.   

Abstract

The 'centre-periphery hypothesis' (CPH) is a long-standing postulate in ecology that states that genetic variation and demographic performance of a species decrease from the centre to the edge of its geographic range. This hypothesis is based on an assumed concordance between geographical peripherality and ecological marginality such that environmental conditions become harsher towards the limits of a species range. In this way, the CPH sets the stage for understanding the causes of distribution limits. To date, no study has examined conjointly the consistency of these postulates. In an extensive literature review we discuss the birth and development of the CPH and provide an assessment of the CPH by reviewing 248 empirical studies in the context of three main themes. First, a decrease in species occurrence towards their range limits was observed in 81% of studies, while only 51% demonstrated reduced abundance of individuals. A decline in genetic variation, increased differentiation among populations and higher rates of inbreeding were demonstrated by roughly one in two studies (47, 45 and 48%, respectively). However, demographic rates, size and population performance less often followed CPH expectations (20-30% of studies). We highlight the impact of important methodological, taxonomic, and biogeographical biases on such validation rates. Second, we found that geographic and ecological marginality gradients are not systematically concordant, which casts doubt on the reliability of a main assumption of the CPH. Finally, we attempt to disentangle the relative contribution of geographical, ecological and historical processes on the spatial distribution of genetic and demographic parameters. While ecological marginality gradients explain variation in species' demographic performance better than geographic gradients, contemporary and historical factors may contribute interactively to spatial patterns of genetic variation. We thereby propose a framework that integrates species' ecological niche characteristics together with current and past range structure to investigate spatial patterns of genetic and demographic variation across species ranges.
© 2016 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Keywords:  abundant-center model; centre-periphery hypothesis; demography; ecological marginality; genetic diversity; meta-analysis; range limits; rear-leading edge; species distribution

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27891813     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  42 in total

1.  Evolutionary origins for ecological patterns in space.

Authors:  Mark C Urban; Sharon Y Strauss; Fanie Pelletier; Eric P Palkovacs; Mathew A Leibold; Andrew P Hendry; Luc De Meester; Stephanie M Carlson; Amy L Angert; Sean T Giery
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Demographic compensation does not rescue populations at a trailing range edge.

Authors:  Seema Nayan Sheth; Amy Lauren Angert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Geography alone cannot explain Tetranychus truncatus (Acari: Tetranychidae) population abundance and genetic diversity in the context of the center-periphery hypothesis.

Authors:  Peng-Yu Jin; Jing-Tao Sun; Lei Chen; Xiao-Feng Xue; Xiao-Yue Hong
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Into the range: a latitudinal gradient or a center-margins differentiation of ecological strategies in Arabidopsis thaliana?

Authors:  Aurélien Estarague; François Vasseur; Kevin Sartori; Cristina C Bastias; Denis Cornet; Lauriane Rouan; Gregory Beurier; Moises Exposito-Alonso; Stéphane Herbette; Justine Bresson; Denis Vile; Cyrille Violle
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Ecology and Evolution of Plants in the Mediterranean Basin: Perspectives and Challenges.

Authors:  Javier Lopez-Alvarado; Emmanuele Farris
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-15

6.  Rainfall and temperature change drive Arnica montana population dynamics at the Northern distribution edge.

Authors:  Jan H Vikane; Knut Rydgren; Eelke Jongejans; Vigdis Vandvik
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Genetic constraints of population expansion of the Carpathian lynx at the western edge of its native distribution range in Central Europe.

Authors:  J Krojerová-Prokešová; B Turbaková; M Jelenčič; M Bojda; M Kutal; T Skrbinšek; P Koubek; J Bryja
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Centre-periphery approaches based on geography, ecology and historical climate stability: what explains the variation in morphological traits of Bulnesia sarmientoi?

Authors:  Gonzalo A Camps; Andrea Cosacov; Alicia N Sérsic
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Does pollen limitation limit plant ranges? Evidence and implications.

Authors:  Emma Dawson-Glass; Anna L Hargreaves
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  The role of neutral and adaptive genomic variation in population diversification and speciation in two ground squirrel species of conservation concern.

Authors:  Soraia Barbosa; Kimberly R Andrews; Amanda R Goldberg; Digpal S Gour; Paul A Hohenlohe; Courtney J Conway; Lisette P Waits
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 6.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.