Literature DB >> 33640970

Centre-periphery approaches based on geography, ecology and historical climate stability: what explains the variation in morphological traits of Bulnesia sarmientoi?

Gonzalo A Camps1,2, Andrea Cosacov2, Alicia N Sérsic2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The centre-periphery hypothesis posits that higher species performance is expected in geographic and ecological centres rather than in peripheral populations. However, this is not the commonly found pattern; therefore, alternative approaches, including the historical dimension of species geographical ranges, should be explored. Morphological functional traits are fundamental determinants of species performance, commonly related to environmental stability and productivity. We tested whether or not historical processes may have shaped variations in tree and leaf traits of the Chaco tree Bulnesia sarmientoi.
METHODS: Morphological variation patterns were analysed from three centre-periphery approaches: geographical, ecological and historical. Tree (stem and canopy) and leaf (leaf size and specific leaf area) traits were measured in 24 populations across the species range. A principal component analysis was performed on morphological traits to obtain synthetic variables. Linear mixed-effects models were used to test which of the implemented centre-periphery approaches significantly explained trait spatial patterns. KEY
RESULTS: The patterns retrieved from the three centre-periphery approaches were not concordant. The historical approach revealed that trees were shorter in centre populations than in the periphery. Significant differences in leaf traits were observed between the geographical centre and the periphery, mainly due to low specific leaf area values towards the geographical centre. We did not find any pattern associated with the ecological centre-periphery approach.
CONCLUSIONS: The decoupled response between leaf and tree traits suggests that these sets of traits respond differently to processes occurring at different times. The geographical and historical approaches showed centres with extreme environments in relation to their respective peripheries, but the historical centre has also been a climatically stable area since the Last Glacial Maximum. The historical approach allowed for the recovery of historical processes underlying variation in tree traits, highlighting that centre-periphery delimitations should be based on a multi-approach framework.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Bulnesia sarmientoizzm321990 ; Centre–periphery hypothesis; Gran Chaco Americano; ecological niche modelling; geographical centre; intraspecific traits; marginal plant populations; niche centroid; refugium

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33640970      PMCID: PMC8225285          DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcab034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Bot        ISSN: 0305-7364            Impact factor:   4.357


  26 in total

1.  A RATIONALE AND TEST FOR THE NUMBER OF FACTORS IN FACTOR ANALYSIS.

Authors:  J L HORN
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum.

Authors:  Ian J Wright; Peter B Reich; Mark Westoby; David D Ackerly; Zdravko Baruch; Frans Bongers; Jeannine Cavender-Bares; Terry Chapin; Johannes H C Cornelissen; Matthias Diemer; Jaume Flexas; Eric Garnier; Philip K Groom; Javier Gulias; Kouki Hikosaka; Byron B Lamont; Tali Lee; William Lee; Christopher Lusk; Jeremy J Midgley; Marie-Laure Navas; Ulo Niinemets; Jacek Oleksyn; Noriyuki Osada; Hendrik Poorter; Pieter Poot; Lynda Prior; Vladimir I Pyankov; Catherine Roumet; Sean C Thomas; Mark G Tjoelker; Erik J Veneklaas; Rafael Villar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Genetic variation across species' geographical ranges: the central-marginal hypothesis and beyond.

Authors:  C G Eckert; K E Samis; S C Lougheed
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Relationship of genetic diversity and niche centrality: a survey and analysis.

Authors:  Andrés Lira-Noriega; Joseph D Manthey
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change.

Authors:  M C Hansen; P V Potapov; R Moore; M Hancher; S A Turubanova; A Tyukavina; D Thau; S V Stehman; S J Goetz; T R Loveland; A Kommareddy; A Egorov; L Chini; C O Justice; J R G Townshend
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Geographic variation in genetic and demographic performance: new insights from an old biogeographical paradigm.

Authors:  Samuel Pironon; Guillaume Papuga; Jesús Villellas; Amy L Angert; María B García; John D Thompson
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2016-11-27

7.  Ecological niche structure and rangewide abundance patterns of species.

Authors:  Enrique Martínez-Meyer; Daniel Díaz-Porras; A Townsend Peterson; Carlos Yáñez-Arenas
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Variation in style morph frequencies in tristylous Lythrum salicaria in the Iberian Peninsula: the role of geographical and demographic factors.

Authors:  Joana Costa; Sílvia Castro; João Loureiro; Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Travelling to the south: Phylogeographic spatial diffusion model in Monttea aphylla (Plantaginaceae), an endemic plant of the Monte Desert.

Authors:  Matias C Baranzelli; Andrea Cosacov; Gabriela Ferreiro; Leigh A Johnson; Alicia N Sérsic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Climatic factors shaping intraspecific leaf trait variation of a neotropical tree along a rainfall gradient.

Authors:  Matheus L Souza; Alexandre A Duarte; Maria B Lovato; Marcilio Fagundes; Fernando Valladares; Jose P Lemos-Filho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.