Literature DB >> 34324748

The role of neutral and adaptive genomic variation in population diversification and speciation in two ground squirrel species of conservation concern.

Soraia Barbosa1, Kimberly R Andrews2, Amanda R Goldberg1, Digpal S Gour1, Paul A Hohenlohe2,3, Courtney J Conway4, Lisette P Waits1.   

Abstract

Understanding the neutral (demographic) and adaptive processes leading to the differentiation of species and populations is a critical component of evolutionary and conservation biology. In this context, recently diverged taxa represent a unique opportunity to study the process of genetic differentiation. Northern and southern Idaho ground squirrels (Urocitellus brunneus-NIDGS, and U. endemicus-SIDGS, respectively) are a recently diverged pair of sister species that have undergone dramatic declines in the last 50 years and are currently found in metapopulations across restricted spatial areas with distinct environmental pressures. Here we genotyped single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from buccal swabs with restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RADseq). With these data we evaluated neutral genetic structure at both the inter- and intraspecific level, and identified putatively adaptive SNPs using population structure outlier detection and genotype-environment association (GEA) analyses. At the interspecific level, we detected a clear separation between NIDGS and SIDGS, and evidence for adaptive differentiation putatively linked to torpor patterns. At the intraspecific level, we found evidence of both neutral and adaptive differentiation. For NIDGS, elevation appears to be the main driver of adaptive differentiation, while neutral variation patterns match and expand information on the low connectivity between some populations identified in previous studies using microsatellite markers. For SIDGS, neutral substructure generally reflected natural geographical barriers, while adaptive variation reflected differences in land cover and temperature, as well as elevation. These results clearly highlight the roles of neutral and adaptive processes for understanding the complexity of the processes leading to species and population differentiation, which can have important conservation implications in susceptible and threatened species.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; conservation genetics; genomics; mammals; speciation; wildlife management

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34324748      PMCID: PMC8484062          DOI: 10.1111/mec.16096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.622


  78 in total

1.  Harnessing genomics for delineating conservation units.

Authors:  W Chris Funk; John K McKay; Paul A Hohenlohe; Fred W Allendorf
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 2.  Geographic variation in genetic and demographic performance: new insights from an old biogeographical paradigm.

Authors:  Samuel Pironon; Guillaume Papuga; Jesús Villellas; Amy L Angert; María B García; John D Thompson
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2016-11-27

Review 3.  Revisiting Adaptive Potential, Population Size, and Conservation.

Authors:  Ary A Hoffmann; Carla M Sgrò; Torsten N Kristensen
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations.

Authors:  M Slatkin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-05-15       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Stacks: an analysis tool set for population genomics.

Authors:  Julian Catchen; Paul A Hohenlohe; Susan Bassham; Angel Amores; William A Cresko
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Too much of a good thing? Finding the most informative genetic data set to answer conservation questions.

Authors:  Elspeth A McLennan; Belinda R Wright; Katherine Belov; Carolyn J Hogg; Catherine E Grueber
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 7.090

7.  Ice-Age Climate Adaptations Trap the Alpine Marmot in a State of Low Genetic Diversity.

Authors:  Toni I Gossmann; Achchuthan Shanmugasundram; Stefan Börno; Ludovic Duvaux; Christophe Lemaire; Heiner Kuhl; Sven Klages; Lee D Roberts; Sophia Schade; Johanna M Gostner; Falk Hildebrand; Jakob Vowinckel; Coraline Bichet; Michael Mülleder; Enrica Calvani; Aleksej Zelezniak; Julian L Griffin; Peer Bork; Dominique Allaine; Aurélie Cohas; John J Welch; Bernd Timmermann; Markus Ralser
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  An integrated framework to identify wildlife populations under threat from climate change.

Authors:  Orly Razgour; John B Taggart; Stephanie Manel; Javier Juste; Carlos Ibáñez; Hugo Rebelo; Antton Alberdi; Gareth Jones; Kirsty Park
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 7.090

9.  Natural selection and neutral evolution jointly drive population divergence between alpine and lowland ecotypes of the allopolyploid plant Anemone multifida (Ranunculaceae).

Authors:  Jamie R McEwen; Jana C Vamosi; Sean M Rogers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Temporal genomic contrasts reveal rapid evolutionary responses in an alpine mammal during recent climate change.

Authors:  Ke Bi; Tyler Linderoth; Sonal Singhal; Dan Vanderpool; James L Patton; Rasmus Nielsen; Craig Moritz; Jeffrey M Good
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.