Anne N Thorndike1, Oliver-John M Bright1, Melissa A Dimond2, Ronald Fishman2, Douglas E Levy3. 1. 1General Medicine Division,Department of Medicine,Massachusetts General Hospital,50 Staniford Street,9th Floor,Boston,MA 02114,USA. 2. 3Center for Community Health Improvement,Massachusetts General Hospital,Boston,MA,USA. 3. 2Harvard Medical School,Boston,MA,USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a pilot study to determine if improving the visibility and quality of fresh produce (choice architecture) in corner stores would increase fruit/vegetable purchases by families participating in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). DESIGN:Six stores were randomly assigned to choice architecture intervention or control. Store-level WIC sales data were provided by the state. Primary outcomes were WIC fruit/vegetable voucher and non-fruit/vegetable voucher sales, comparing trends from baseline (December 2012-October 2013) with the five-month intervention period (December 2013-April 2014). Secondary outcomes were differences in customer self-reported fruit/vegetable purchases between baseline and end of the intervention. SETTING: Chelsea, MA, USA, a low-income urban community. SUBJECTS:Adult customers (n 575) completing store exit interviews. RESULTS: During baseline, WIC fruit/vegetable and non-fruit/vegetable sales decreased in both intervention and control stores by $US 16/month. During the intervention period, WIC fruit/vegetable sales increased in intervention stores by $US 40/month but decreased in control stores by $US 23/month (difference in trends: $US 63/month; 95 % CI 4, 121 $US/month; P=0·036); WIC non-fruit/vegetable sales were not different (P=0·45). Comparing baseline and intervention-period exit interview responses by customers participating in WIC (n 134), intervention store customers reported increased fruit/vegetable purchases compared with control store customers (18 v. -2 %), but this did not achieve statistical significance (P=0·11). CONCLUSIONS: Placement of fruits/vegetables near the front of corner stores increased purchase of produce by customers using WIC. New policies that incentivize stores to stock and prominently display good-quality produce could promote healthier food choices of low-income families.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a pilot study to determine if improving the visibility and quality of fresh produce (choice architecture) in corner stores would increase fruit/vegetable purchases by families participating in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). DESIGN: Six stores were randomly assigned to choice architecture intervention or control. Store-level WIC sales data were provided by the state. Primary outcomes were WIC fruit/vegetable voucher and non-fruit/vegetable voucher sales, comparing trends from baseline (December 2012-October 2013) with the five-month intervention period (December 2013-April 2014). Secondary outcomes were differences in customer self-reported fruit/vegetable purchases between baseline and end of the intervention. SETTING: Chelsea, MA, USA, a low-income urban community. SUBJECTS: Adult customers (n 575) completing store exit interviews. RESULTS: During baseline, WIC fruit/vegetable and non-fruit/vegetable sales decreased in both intervention and control stores by $US 16/month. During the intervention period, WIC fruit/vegetable sales increased in intervention stores by $US 40/month but decreased in control stores by $US 23/month (difference in trends: $US 63/month; 95 % CI 4, 121 $US/month; P=0·036); WIC non-fruit/vegetable sales were not different (P=0·45). Comparing baseline and intervention-period exit interview responses by customers participating in WIC (n 134), intervention store customers reported increased fruit/vegetable purchases compared with control store customers (18 v. -2 %), but this did not achieve statistical significance (P=0·11). CONCLUSIONS: Placement of fruits/vegetables near the front of corner stores increased purchase of produce by customers using WIC. New policies that incentivize stores to stock and prominently display good-quality produce could promote healthier food choices of low-income families.
Entities:
Keywords:
Choice architecture; Corner stores; Fruits and vegetables; WIC
Authors: Hannah G Lawman; Stephanie Vander Veur; Giridhar Mallya; Tara A McCoy; Alexis Wojtanowski; Lisa Colby; Timothy A Sanders; Michelle R Lent; Brianna A Sandoval; Sandy Sherman; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Gary D Foster Journal: Prev Med Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: M A Chiasson; S E Findley; J P Sekhobo; R Scheinmann; L S Edmunds; A S Faly; N J McLeod Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Alyssa J Moran; Neha Khandpur; Michele Polacsek; Anne N Thorndike; Rebecca L Franckle; Rebecca Boulos; Sally Sampson; Julie C Greene; Dan G Blue; Eric B Rimm Journal: J Nutr Educ Behav Date: 2019-02-12 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Bradley M Appelhans; Christy C Tangney; Simone A French; Melissa M Crane; Yamin Wang Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Jessica L McCurley; Douglas E Levy; Eric B Rimm; Emily D Gelsomin; Emma M Anderson; Jenny M Sanford; Anne N Thorndike Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2019-05-22 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Rebecca L Franckle; Douglas E Levy; Lorena Macias-Navarro; Eric B Rimm; Anne N Thorndike Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Stephanie L Albert; Brent A Langellier; Mienah Z Sharif; Alec M Chan-Golston; Michael L Prelip; Rosa Elena Garcia; Deborah C Glik; Thomas R Belin; Ron Brookmeyer; Alexander N Ortega Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2017-06-05 Impact factor: 4.022