| Literature DB >> 27890014 |
Antonildes N Assunção1, Michael Jerosch-Herold2, Rodrigo L Melo1, Alejandra V Mauricio1, Liliane Rocha1, Jorge A Torreão1, Fabio Fernandes1, Barbara M Ianni1, Charles Mady1, José A F Ramires1, Roberto Kalil-Filho1, Carlos E Rochitte3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Since a male-related higher cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with Chagas' heart disease has been reported, we aimed to investigate gender differences in myocardial damage assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Chagas’ heart disease; Gender differences; Myocardial dysfunction; Myocardial fibrosis
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27890014 PMCID: PMC5125033 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-016-0307-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Characteristics of Patients with Chagas’ Heart Disease
| Characteristics | Male ( | Female ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Data | |||
| Age – years* | 54 (11) | 55 (11) | 0.55 |
| Body mass index [kg/m2]† | 26 (23–29) | 25 (24–29) | 0.55 |
| Obesity - no. (%) | 5 (21) | 9 (24) | 0.79 |
| Hypercholesterolemia – no. (%) | 9 (38) | 16 (42) | 0.72 |
| Diabetes mellitus – no. (%) | 4 (17) | 2 (5) | 0.19 |
| Hypertension – no. (%) | 8 (33) | 14 (37) | 0.78 |
| Current smoker – no. (%) | 4 (17) | 2 (5) | 0.19 |
| CAD score† | 4.3 (1.7) | 1.1 (1.1) |
|
| NYHA functional class > I - no. (%) | 13 (54) | 11 (29) |
|
| NYHA functional class† | 2 (1–2.5) | 1 (1–2) |
|
| GFR [mL/min per 1.73 m2]* | 80 (26) | 78 (26) | 0.73 |
| CMR | |||
| LVEDVI [mL/m2]† | 116 (97–161) | 86 (72–108) |
|
| LVESVI [mL/m2]† | 74 (50–114) | 34 (28–57) |
|
| LV mass index [g/m2]† | 74 (63–89) | 51 (44–61) |
|
| LVEF [%]† | 37 (28–46) | 58 (47–62) |
|
| Aneurysm – no. (%) | 7 (29) | 6 (16) | 0.21 |
| RVESVI [mL/m2]† | 80 (63–92) | 68 (59–74) |
|
| RVEDVI [mL/m2]† | 38 (32–50) | 25 (22–34) |
|
| RVEF [%]† | 50 (36–59) | 60 (52–65) |
|
| Myocardial Fibrosis – yes | 21 (87) | 27 (71) | 0.21 |
| Myocardial Fibrosis [grams]† | 19 (9–30) | 2.4 (0–12) |
|
| Myocardial Fibrosis (% LV mass)† | 12 (8–22) | 3 (0–11) |
|
| Gray zone 6SD-7SD [grams]† | 2.2 (0–4.2) | 1.3 (0–2.3) |
|
| LGE Patterns* | 3.9 (0.9) | 3.8 (1.0) | 0.72 |
LV denotes left ventricular, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEDVI left ventricular end-diastolic volume index, LVESVI left ventricular end-systolic volume index, NYHA New York Heart Association Functional Classification, RVEF right ventricular ejection fraction, RVEDVI right ventricular end-diastolic volume index, and RVESVI right ventricular end-systolic volume index, LGE late gadolinium enhancement, GFR Glomerular filtration rate. CAD score to assess the clinical probability of having high-risk CAD (low ≤7 points; intermediate, 8–17 points. Patients with high score, ≥18 points, were excluded from this study) [9]. *means (SD) and †medians (25 and 75th centiles). Significant P-values (< 0.05) are shown in bold
Fig. 1LGE frequency in male and female patients with Chagas’ heart disease. “n” illustrates the total of analyzed segments
Fig. 2Examples of CMR, invasive and CT angiography in two representative patients with Chagas’ heart disease. First patient (top row): a and b CMR reveals transmural LGE pattern in the LV lateral wall (yellow arrow) with concomitant septal midwall LGE (white arrow) and, by invasive angiography, (c and d) normal coronary arteries. Second patient (bottom row): (e) cine-CMR image reveals a classical Chagas’ heart disease finding, the vorticle aneurysm (red arrow), (f and g) LGE reveals subendocardial pattern in the lateral wall (yellow arrow) and, by CT angiography, (h and i) normal coronary arteries. Blue arrow (f and g) indicating the region of interest (ROI) for calculating the mean signal intensity (SI) of the reference normal myocardium
Fig. 3LGE patterns in male and female patients with Chagas’ heart disease. “n” illustrates the absolute frequency of the LGE pattern divided by the total of analyzed segments
Fig. 4Sex-specific correlations between MF and LVEF
Fig. 5a Unadjusted effect of gender on MF and b effects of gender and MF (10-unit increase) on LVEF. Model 1 demonstrates unadjusted effects of gender and MF on LVEF. Model 2 demonstrates the effect of gender on LVEF when adjusted to MF. Model 3 demonstrates the Model 2 additionally adjusted for CAD risk factors (age, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, body mass index, active smoking). Natural logarithm transformation was used to improve normality and/or homoscedasticity of residuals. The effect was calculated from exponential linear regression coefficients (100 × [e − 1]). LVEF was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction, and MF myocardial fibrosis (%LV Mass)
Fig. 6Mediation model illustrating indirect effect (through MF) and direct effect of gender on LVEF. β-coefficients of log-level linear regressions of Sobel-Goodman mediation tests. LVEF was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction, and MF myocardial fibrosis (%LV Mass)