Literature DB >> 27888040

Evidence that hidden hearing loss underlies amplitude modulation encoding deficits in individuals with and without tinnitus.

Brandon T Paul1, Ian C Bruce2, Larry E Roberts3.   

Abstract

Damage to auditory nerve fibers that expresses with suprathreshold sounds but is hidden from the audiogram has been proposed to underlie deficits in temporal coding ability observed among individuals with otherwise normal hearing, and to be present in individuals experiencing chronic tinnitus with clinically normal audiograms. We tested whether these individuals may have hidden synaptic losses on auditory nerve fibers with low spontaneous rates of firing (low-SR fibers) that are important for coding suprathreshold sounds in noise while high-SR fibers determining threshold responses in quiet remain relatively unaffected. Tinnitus and control subjects were required to detect the presence of amplitude modulation (AM) in a 5 kHz, suprathreshold tone (a frequency in the tinnitus frequency region of the tinnitus subjects, whose audiometric thresholds were normal to 12 kHz). The AM tone was embedded within background noise intended to degrade the contribution of high-SR fibers, such that AM coding was preferentially reliant on low-SR fibers. We also recorded by electroencephalography the "envelope following response" (EFR, generated in the auditory midbrain) to a 5 kHz, 85 Hz AM tone presented in the same background noise, and also in quiet (both low-SR and high-SR fibers contributing to AM coding in the latter condition). Control subjects with EFRs that were comparatively resistant to the addition of background noise had better AM detection thresholds than controls whose EFRs were more affected by noise. Simulated auditory nerve responses to our stimulus conditions using a well-established peripheral model suggested that low-SR fibers were better preserved in the former cases. Tinnitus subjects had worse AM detection thresholds and reduced EFRs overall compared to controls. Simulated auditory nerve responses found that in addition to severe low-SR fiber loss, a degree of high-SR fiber loss that would not be expected to affect audiometric thresholds was needed to explain the results in tinnitus subjects. The results indicate that hidden hearing loss could be sufficient to account for impaired temporal coding in individuals with normal audiograms as well as for cases of tinnitus without audiometric hearing loss.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amplitude modulation encoding; Envelope following response; Hidden hearing loss; Peripheral auditory modeling; Tinnitus

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27888040     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  26 in total

1.  Tinnitus Does Not Interfere with Auditory and Speech Perception.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Matthew Richardson; Katie Turner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners With Normal Hearing Thresholds.

Authors:  Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Non-Invasive Assays of Cochlear Synaptopathy - Candidates and Considerations.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Alexandra R Mai; Jennifer M Simpson; Inyong Choi; Michael G Heinz; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Auditory-somatosensory bimodal stimulation desynchronizes brain circuitry to reduce tinnitus in guinea pigs and humans.

Authors:  Kendra L Marks; David T Martel; Calvin Wu; Gregory J Basura; Larry E Roberts; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Susan E Shore
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 5.  Neural plasticity and its initiating conditions in tinnitus.

Authors:  L E Roberts
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  Towards a Mechanistic-Driven Precision Medicine Approach for Tinnitus.

Authors:  Thanos Tzounopoulos; Carey Balaban; Lori Zitelli; Catherine Palmer
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-01

7.  Macrostructural Changes of the Acoustic Radiation in Humans with Hearing Loss and Tinnitus Revealed with Fixel-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Elouise A Koops; Shereif Haykal; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Tinnitus and Auditory Perception After a History of Noise Exposure: Relationship to Auditory Brainstem Response Measures.

Authors:  Naomi F Bramhall; Dawn Konrad-Martin; Garnett P McMillan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 9.  Hidden Hearing Loss: A Disorder with Multiple Etiologies and Mechanisms.

Authors:  David C Kohrman; Guoqiang Wan; Luis Cassinotti; Gabriel Corfas
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 6.915

10.  Predicting synapse counts in living humans by combining computational models with auditory physiology.

Authors:  Brad N Buran; Garnett P McMillan; Sarineh Keshishzadeh; Sarah Verhulst; Naomi F Bramhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 2.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.