Shiying Liu1, Jessica Churchill1, Lanqi Hua1, Xin Zeng1, Valerie Rhoades1, Mayooran Namasivayam1, Vinit Baliyan2, Brian B Ghoshhajra2, Tony Dong3, Jacob P Dal-Bianco1, Jonathan J Passeri1, Robert A Levine1, Judy Hung4. 1. Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York. 4. Division of Cardiology, Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: jhung@mgh.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Evaluation of aortic stenosis (AS) requires calculation of aortic valve area (AVA), which relies on the assumption of a circular-shaped left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). However, the LVOT is often elliptical, and the circular assumption underestimates the true LVOT area (LVOTA). Biplane imaging using transthoracic echocardiography allows direct planimetry of LVOTA. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of obtaining LVOTA using this technique and its impact on the discordance between AVA and gradient criteria in AS grading. METHODS: We prospectively studied 134 patients (median age, 80 years; interquartile range, 73-87 years; 39% women) with AS, including 82 (61%) with severe AS and 52 (39%) with mild or moderate AS. LVOTA was traced using direct planimetry (LVOTAbiplane) and compared with LVOTA calculated using the circular assumption (LVOTAcirc). In a subset of patients who underwent cardiac computed tomography, direct planimetry of LVOTA was used as a reference standard. RESULTS: LVOTAbiplane was significantly larger than LVOTAcirc (4.20 cm2 [interquartile range, 3.66-4.90 cm2] vs 3.73 cm2 [interquartile range, 3.14-4.15 cm2], P < .001). Among 30 patients who underwent cardiac computed tomography, LVOTAbiplane had better agreement with LVOTA by direct planimetry than LVOTAcirc (mean bias, -0.45 ± 0.63 vs -1.02 ± 0.63 cm2; P < .0001). Of 82 patients with severe AS (AVA ≤ 1 cm2 using LVOTAcirc), 40 (49%) had discordant mean gradient (<40 mm Hg). By using LVOTAbiplane, patients with discordant AVA and mean gradient decreased from 49% to 27% (P = .004), and 29% of patients with severe AS were reclassified with moderate AS, with the highest percentage of reclassification in the group with low-gradient AS with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: Direct planimetry using biplane imaging avoids the inherent underestimation of LVOTA using the circular assumption. LVOTA obtained by biplane planimetry can lead to better concordance between AVA and mean gradient and classification of AS severity.
BACKGROUND: Evaluation of aortic stenosis (AS) requires calculation of aortic valve area (AVA), which relies on the assumption of a circular-shaped left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). However, the LVOT is often elliptical, and the circular assumption underestimates the true LVOT area (LVOTA). Biplane imaging using transthoracic echocardiography allows direct planimetry of LVOTA. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of obtaining LVOTA using this technique and its impact on the discordance between AVA and gradient criteria in AS grading. METHODS: We prospectively studied 134 patients (median age, 80 years; interquartile range, 73-87 years; 39% women) with AS, including 82 (61%) with severe AS and 52 (39%) with mild or moderate AS. LVOTA was traced using direct planimetry (LVOTAbiplane) and compared with LVOTA calculated using the circular assumption (LVOTAcirc). In a subset of patients who underwent cardiac computed tomography, direct planimetry of LVOTA was used as a reference standard. RESULTS: LVOTAbiplane was significantly larger than LVOTAcirc (4.20 cm2 [interquartile range, 3.66-4.90 cm2] vs 3.73 cm2 [interquartile range, 3.14-4.15 cm2], P < .001). Among 30 patients who underwent cardiac computed tomography, LVOTAbiplane had better agreement with LVOTA by direct planimetry than LVOTAcirc (mean bias, -0.45 ± 0.63 vs -1.02 ± 0.63 cm2; P < .0001). Of 82 patients with severe AS (AVA ≤ 1 cm2 using LVOTAcirc), 40 (49%) had discordant mean gradient (<40 mm Hg). By using LVOTAbiplane, patients with discordant AVA and mean gradient decreased from 49% to 27% (P = .004), and 29% of patients with severe AS were reclassified with moderate AS, with the highest percentage of reclassification in the group with low-gradient AS with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: Direct planimetry using biplane imaging avoids the inherent underestimation of LVOTA using the circular assumption. LVOTA obtained by biplane planimetry can lead to better concordance between AVA and mean gradient and classification of AS severity.
Authors: Arnold C T Ng; Victoria Delgado; Frank van der Kley; Miriam Shanks; Nico R L van de Veire; Matteo Bertini; Gaetano Nucifora; Rutger J van Bommel; Laurens F Tops; Arend de Weger; Giuseppe Tavilla; Albert de Roos; Lucia J Kroft; Dominic Y Leung; Joanne Schuijf; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-11-17 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Luis Caballero; Daniel Saura; María José Oliva-Sandoval; Josefa González-Carrillo; María Dolores Espinosa; Miguel García-Navarro; Mariano Valdés; Patrizio Lancellotti; Gonzalo de la Morena Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Victoria Delgado; Marie-Annick Clavel; Rebecca T Hahn; Linda Gillam; Jeroen Bax; Partho P Sengupta; Philippe Pibarot Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2019-02
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Salim S Virani; Clifton W Callaway; Alanna M Chamberlain; Alexander R Chang; Susan Cheng; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Francesca N Delling; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; Jane F Ferguson; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Pamela L Lutsey; Jason S Mackey; David B Matchar; Kunihiro Matsushita; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Martin O'Flaherty; Latha P Palaniappan; Ambarish Pandey; Dilip K Pandey; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew D Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Gary M Satou; Svati H Shah; Nicole L Spartano; David L Tirschwell; Connie W Tsao; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Helmut Baumgartner; Judy Hung; Javier Bermejo; John B Chambers; Thor Edvardsen; Steven Goldstein; Patrizio Lancellotti; Melissa LeFevre; Fletcher Miller; Catherine M Otto Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 5.251