Douglas E Jorenby1, Stevens S Smith2, Michael C Fiore2, Timothy B Baker2. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, 1930 Monroe St., Suite 200, Madison, WI 53711, United States. Electronic address: Dej@ctri.wisc.edu. 2. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, 1930 Monroe St., Suite 200, Madison, WI 53711, United States.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate how experienced dual users used cigarettes and e-cigarettes in real-world use and under different levels of cigarette availability. METHODS: Dual users (cigarettes+e-cigarettes; n=74) and a smoke-only group (just cigarettes; n=74) engaged in a 26-day study with two ad lib use intervals, a week of 75% cigarette reduction and three days of 100% cigarette reduction. After a week of ad lib use of products, all participants were asked to reduce smoking by 75% (dual users were free to use their e-cigarettes as they wished), followed by another week of ad lib use. All participants were then asked to reduce smoking by 100% (cessation) for three days. Primary outcomes were biological samples (carbon monoxide, urinary nicotine and cotinine). Participants also provided real-time reports of product use, craving, and withdrawal symptoms using a smartphone app. RESULTS: Dual users did not smoke fewer cigarettes than smoke-only participants during ad lib periods, but quadrupled their use of e-cigarettes during smoking reduction periods. Dual users were significantly more likely to maintain 100% reduction (97.1% vs. 81.2%). Amongst women, dual use was associated with higher nicotine levels and withdrawal suppression. DISCUSSION: Among a group of experienced dual users, e-cigarettes helped maintain smoking reduction and reduced some withdrawal symptoms, although both withdrawal symptoms and nicotine levels varied as a function of gender.
INTRODUCTION: To evaluate how experienced dual users used cigarettes and e-cigarettes in real-world use and under different levels of cigarette availability. METHODS: Dual users (cigarettes+e-cigarettes; n=74) and a smoke-only group (just cigarettes; n=74) engaged in a 26-day study with two ad lib use intervals, a week of 75% cigarette reduction and three days of 100% cigarette reduction. After a week of ad lib use of products, all participants were asked to reduce smoking by 75% (dual users were free to use their e-cigarettes as they wished), followed by another week of ad lib use. All participants were then asked to reduce smoking by 100% (cessation) for three days. Primary outcomes were biological samples (carbon monoxide, urinary nicotine and cotinine). Participants also provided real-time reports of product use, craving, and withdrawal symptoms using a smartphone app. RESULTS: Dual users did not smoke fewer cigarettes than smoke-only participants during ad lib periods, but quadrupled their use of e-cigarettes during smoking reduction periods. Dual users were significantly more likely to maintain 100% reduction (97.1% vs. 81.2%). Amongst women, dual use was associated with higher nicotine levels and withdrawal suppression. DISCUSSION: Among a group of experienced dual users, e-cigarettes helped maintain smoking reduction and reduced some withdrawal symptoms, although both withdrawal symptoms and nicotine levels varied as a function of gender.
Authors: Stephen S Hecht; Steven G Carmella; Delshanee Kotandeniya; Makenzie E Pillsbury; Menglan Chen; Benjamin W S Ransom; Rachel Isaksson Vogel; Elizabeth Thompson; Sharon E Murphy; Dorothy K Hatsukami Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-10-21 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Megan E Piper; Danielle E McCarthy; Daniel M Bolt; Stevens S Smith; Caryn Lerman; Neal Benowitz; Michael C Fiore; Timothy B Baker Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Hayden McRobbie; Anna Phillips; Maciej L Goniewicz; Katie Myers Smith; Oliver Knight-West; Dunja Przulj; Peter Hajek Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2015-09
Authors: Neal Doran; Kristin Brikmanis; Angela Petersen; Kevin Delucchi; Wael K Al-Delaimy; Susan Luczak; Mark Myers; David Strong Journal: Prev Med Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Arielle S Selya; Lisa Dierker; Jennifer S Rose; Donald Hedeker; Robin J Mermelstein Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Dorothy A Rhoades; Ashley L Comiford; Justin D Dvorak; Kai Ding; Leslie M Driskill; Audrea M Hopkins; Paul Spicer; Theodore L Wagener; Mark P Doescher Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.043