Michael D Sawdey1, Linda Hancock2, Marcus Messner3, Elizabeth C Prom-Wormley1. 1. a Division of Epidemiology, Department of Family Medicine and Population Health , Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond , Virginia , USA. 2. b The Wellness Resource Center , Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond , Virginia , USA. 3. c Richard T. Robertson School of Media and Culture , Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond , Virginia , USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Social media platforms provide an indirect medium for encouraging e-cigarette use between individuals and also serve as a direct marketing tool from e-cigarette brands to potential users. E-cigarette users share information via social media that often contains product details or health-related claims. OBJECTIVE: Determine whether e-cigarette use is associated with exposure to e-cigarettes on social media in college students. METHODS: Data from a sample of 258 college students was obtained via a clicker-response questionnaire (90% response rate). Demographic, lifetime and current e-cigarette/cigarette use, and e-cigarette exposure via social media (peer posts or advertisements) were examined. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between lifetime and current e-cigarette use and viewing peer posts or advertisements on social media while adjusting for cigarette use and self-posting about e-cigarettes. RESULTS: Overall, 46% of participants reported lifetime e-cigarette use, 16% current e-cigarette use, and 7% were current dual users of e-cigarettes and cigarettes. There were positive and significant associations between lifetime e-cigarette use and viewing peer posts (aOR = 3.11; 95% CI = 1.25-7.76) as well as advertisements (aOR = 3.01; 95% CI = 1.19-7.65) on e-cigarettes via social media after adjusting for cigarette use. Current e-cigarette use was only significantly associated with viewing peer posts via social media (aOR = 7.58; 95% CI = 1.66-34.6) after adjusting for cigarette use. Conclusions/Importance: Almost half of college students view peer posts and advertisements on e-cigarettes via social media. This exposure is associated with individual e-cigarette use. Continued efforts to examine online e-cigarette content are needed to help future interventions decrease e-cigarette use.
BACKGROUND: Social media platforms provide an indirect medium for encouraging e-cigarette use between individuals and also serve as a direct marketing tool from e-cigarette brands to potential users. E-cigarette users share information via social media that often contains product details or health-related claims. OBJECTIVE: Determine whether e-cigarette use is associated with exposure to e-cigarettes on social media in college students. METHODS: Data from a sample of 258 college students was obtained via a clicker-response questionnaire (90% response rate). Demographic, lifetime and current e-cigarette/cigarette use, and e-cigarette exposure via social media (peer posts or advertisements) were examined. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between lifetime and current e-cigarette use and viewing peer posts or advertisements on social media while adjusting for cigarette use and self-posting about e-cigarettes. RESULTS: Overall, 46% of participants reported lifetime e-cigarette use, 16% current e-cigarette use, and 7% were current dual users of e-cigarettes and cigarettes. There were positive and significant associations between lifetime e-cigarette use and viewing peer posts (aOR = 3.11; 95% CI = 1.25-7.76) as well as advertisements (aOR = 3.01; 95% CI = 1.19-7.65) on e-cigarettes via social media after adjusting for cigarette use. Current e-cigarette use was only significantly associated with viewing peer posts via social media (aOR = 7.58; 95% CI = 1.66-34.6) after adjusting for cigarette use. Conclusions/Importance: Almost half of college students view peer posts and advertisements on e-cigarettes via social media. This exposure is associated with individual e-cigarette use. Continued efforts to examine online e-cigarette content are needed to help future interventions decrease e-cigarette use.
Entities:
Keywords:
Electronic cigarettes; college students; social media
Authors: Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Kiros Berhane; Jennifer B Unger; Tess Boley Cruz; Robert Urman; Chih Ping Chou; Steve Howland; Kejia Wang; Mary Ann Pentz; Tamika D Gilreath; Jimi Huh; Adam M Leventhal; Jonathan M Samet; Rob McConnell Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Annice E Kim; Timothy Hopper; Sean Simpson; James Nonnemaker; Alicea J Lieberman; Heather Hansen; Jamie Guillory; Lauren Porter Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Cheryl L Perry; MeLisa R Creamer; Benjamin W Chaffee; Jennifer B Unger; Erin L Sutfin; Grace Kong; Ce Shang; Stephanie L Clendennen; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Mary Ann Pentz Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Erin A Vogel; Danielle E Ramo; Mark L Rubinstein; Kevin L Delucchi; Sabrina M Darrow; Caitlin Costello; Judith J Prochaska Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Juhan Lee; Andy S L Tan; Lauren Porter; Kelly C Young-Wolff; Lisa Carter-Harris; Ramzi G Salloum Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Stephanie L Clendennen; Alexandra Loukas; Elizabeth A Vandewater; Cheryl L Perry; Anna V Wilkinson Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 4.852