OBJECTIVE: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have gained popularity as a method to reduce conventional cigarette smoking, despite mixed evidence on their effectiveness. This study evaluates the relationship between overall and product-specific nicotine dependence and the transitions between dual use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes versus exclusive cigarette or e-cigarette use over time. METHOD: This study used data from Waves 1-3 (2013-2016) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. Weighted logistic regressions with person-level random effects tested relationships between nicotine dependence and dual versus exclusive use over time. Dual use transitions were then compared with the characteristics of e-cigarette devices used and reasons to use them. RESULTS: Higher tobacco dependence was associated with becoming or remaining a dual user rather than remaining or becoming an exclusive user of cigarettes or e-cigarettes (p < .05). Higher e-cigarette dependence was associated with remaining or becoming an exclusive e-cigarette user. The number of days smoking cigarettes or using e-cigarettes in the past 30 days was also associated with greater odds of remaining or transitioning to exclusive use of that product (p < .05). Exclusive e-cigarette users tended to invest more financially in their devices and were more likely to report owning modifiable devices. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new evidence that established dual use and transitions to and from dual use are associated with higher tobacco dependence compared with remaining a cigarette- or e-cigarette-only user and that higher e-cigarette dependence is associated with becoming or remaining an exclusive user of e-cigarettes.
OBJECTIVE: Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have gained popularity as a method to reduce conventional cigarette smoking, despite mixed evidence on their effectiveness. This study evaluates the relationship between overall and product-specific nicotine dependence and the transitions between dual use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes versus exclusive cigarette or e-cigarette use over time. METHOD: This study used data from Waves 1-3 (2013-2016) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. Weighted logistic regressions with person-level random effects tested relationships between nicotine dependence and dual versus exclusive use over time. Dual use transitions were then compared with the characteristics of e-cigarette devices used and reasons to use them. RESULTS: Higher tobacco dependence was associated with becoming or remaining a dual user rather than remaining or becoming an exclusive user of cigarettes or e-cigarettes (p < .05). Higher e-cigarette dependence was associated with remaining or becoming an exclusive e-cigarette user. The number of days smoking cigarettes or using e-cigarettes in the past 30 days was also associated with greater odds of remaining or transitioning to exclusive use of that product (p < .05). Exclusive e-cigarette users tended to invest more financially in their devices and were more likely to report owning modifiable devices. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new evidence that established dual use and transitions to and from dual use are associated with higher tobacco dependence compared with remaining a cigarette- or e-cigarette-only user and that higher e-cigarette dependence is associated with becoming or remaining an exclusive user of e-cigarettes.
Authors: Lauren R Meltzer; Vani N Simmons; Steven K Sutton; David J Drobes; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Cathy D Meade; Marina Unrod; Karen O Brandon; Paul T Harrell; Thomas Eissenberg; Christopher R Bullen; Thomas H Brandon Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2017-06-22 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Adam M Leventhal; David R Strong; Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Jennifer B Unger; Steve Sussman; Nathaniel R Riggs; Matthew D Stone; Rubin Khoddam; Jonathan M Samet; Janet Audrain-McGovern Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Deesha Patel; Kevin C Davis; Shanna Cox; Brian Bradfield; Brian A King; Paul Shafer; Ralph Caraballo; Rebecca Bunnell Journal: Prev Med Date: 2016-09-07 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Kaitlyn M Berry; Lindsay M Reynolds; Jason M Collins; Michael B Siegel; Jessica L Fetterman; Naomi M Hamburg; Aruni Bhatnagar; Emelia J Benjamin; Andrew Stokes Journal: Tob Control Date: 2018-03-24 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Blair Coleman; Joanne T Chang; Brian L Rostron; Sarah E Johnson; Babita Das; Arseima Y Del Valle-Pinero Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Adriana Pérez; Arnold E Kuk; Meagan A Bluestein; Hui Min Shirlyn Sia; Baojiang Chen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-09 Impact factor: 3.390