BACKGROUND: No prior reports documenting the safety and diagnostic yield of cardiac catheterization and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in heart transplant recipients include multicenter data. METHODS: Data on the safety and diagnostic yield of EMB procedures performed in heart transplant recipients were recorded in the Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Outcomes Project database at 8 pediatric centers during a 3-year period. Adverse events (AEs) were classified according to a 5-level severity scale. Generalized estimating equation models identified risk factors for high-severity AEs (HSAEs; Levels 3-5) and non-diagnostic biopsy samples. RESULTS: A total of 2,665 EMB cases were performed in 744 pediatric heart transplant recipients (median age, 12 years [interquartile range, 4.8, 16.7]; 54% male). AEs occurred in 88 cases (3.3%), of which 28 (1.1%) were HSAEs. AEs attributable to EMB included tricuspid valve injury, transient complete heart block, and right bundle branch block. Amongst 822 cases involving coronary angiography, 10 (1.2%) resulted in a coronary-related AE. There were no myocardial perforations or deaths. Multivariable risk factors for HSAEs included fewer prior catheterizations (p = 0.006) and longer case length (p < 0.001). EMB yielded sufficient tissue for diagnosis in 99% of cases. Longer time since heart transplant was the most significant predictor of a non-diagnostic biopsy sample (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the current era, cardiac catheterizations involving EMB can be performed in pediatric heart transplant recipients with a low AE rate and high diagnostic yield. Risk of HSAEs is increased in early post-transplant biopsies and with longer case length. Longer time since heart transplant is associated with non-diagnostic EMB samples. Copyright Â
BACKGROUND: No prior reports documenting the safety and diagnostic yield of cardiac catheterization and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in heart transplant recipients include multicenter data. METHODS: Data on the safety and diagnostic yield of EMB procedures performed in heart transplant recipients were recorded in the Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Outcomes Project database at 8 pediatric centers during a 3-year period. Adverse events (AEs) were classified according to a 5-level severity scale. Generalized estimating equation models identified risk factors for high-severity AEs (HSAEs; Levels 3-5) and non-diagnostic biopsy samples. RESULTS: A total of 2,665 EMB cases were performed in 744 pediatric heart transplant recipients (median age, 12 years [interquartile range, 4.8, 16.7]; 54% male). AEs occurred in 88 cases (3.3%), of which 28 (1.1%) were HSAEs. AEs attributable to EMB included tricuspid valve injury, transient complete heart block, and right bundle branch block. Amongst 822 cases involving coronary angiography, 10 (1.2%) resulted in a coronary-related AE. There were no myocardial perforations or deaths. Multivariable risk factors for HSAEs included fewer prior catheterizations (p = 0.006) and longer case length (p < 0.001). EMB yielded sufficient tissue for diagnosis in 99% of cases. Longer time since heart transplant was the most significant predictor of a non-diagnostic biopsy sample (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the current era, cardiac catheterizations involving EMB can be performed in pediatric heart transplant recipients with a low AE rate and high diagnostic yield. Risk of HSAEs is increased in early post-transplant biopsies and with longer case length. Longer time since heart transplant is associated with non-diagnostic EMB samples. Copyright Â
Authors: M J Williams; M Y Lee; T G DiSalvo; G W Dec; M H Picard; I F Palacios; M J Semigran Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1996-06-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: D T Balzer; S Moorhead; J E Saffitz; C B Huddleston; T L Spray; C E Canter Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 1995 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: V R Zales; S Crawford; C L Backer; E Pahl; C L Webb; P Lynch; C Mavroudis; D W Benson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1994-03-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Kimberly I Mills; Julie A Vincent; Warren A Zuckerman; Timothy M Hoffman; Charles E Canter; Audrey C Marshall; Elizabeth D Blume; Lisa Bergersen; Kevin P Daly Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Jeffrey G Gossett; Christina L Sammet; Anya Agrawal; Karen Rychlik; David F Wax Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2016-11-23 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Michael L O'Byrne; Andrew C Glatz; Brian D Hanna; Russell T Shinohara; Matthew J Gillespie; Yoav Dori; Jonathan J Rome; Steven M Kawut Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Diego A Lara; Mary K Olive; James F George; Robert N Brown; Waldemar F Carlo; Edward V Colvin; Brad L Steenwyck; F Bennett Pearce Journal: Tex Heart Inst J Date: 2014-02
Authors: Steven C Greenway; Frederic Dallaire; Paul F Kantor; Anne I Dipchand; Rajiv R Chaturvedi; Monali Warade; Eugenie Riesenkampff; Shi-Joon Yoo; Lars Grosse-Wortmann Journal: World J Transplant Date: 2016-12-24