Literature DB >> 27873012

Robotic cholecystectomy using Revo-i Model MSR-5000, the newly developed Korean robotic surgical system: a preclinical study.

Jin Hong Lim1, Woo Jung Lee2, Dong Won Park3, Hye Jin Yea4, Se Hoon Kim5, Chang Moo Kang6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has become the standard option for gastrointestinal surgeries. However, laparoscopic procedures require extended training times and are difficult for inexperienced surgeons. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery facilitates easy adaptation of laparoscopic procedures, but robotic surgical systems are expensive. In addition, their cost has remained high because there is currently only one manufacturer of commercially available systems. Recently, a new Korean robotic surgical system, Revo-i, has been developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of Revo-i by performing robotic cholecystectomy in a porcine model.
METHODS: After approval by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Yonsei University Health System, cholecystectomy was performed in four pigs using the Revo-i robotic surgical system. Operative time and perioperative complications were recorded, and all animals were observed for postoperative complications for 2 weeks after surgery
RESULTS: Robotic cholecystectomy was completed successfully and without gallbladder perforation in all cases. The mean operative time was 78 ± 12 min, the mean docking time was 4.5 ± 2.52 min, and the mean console time was 49.8 ± 14.17 min. There were no perioperative complications, and none of the animal used for the in vivo models exhibited abnormal behavior during the postoperative observation period.
CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results verify the safety and efficacy of robotic cholecystectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system. Human trials are slated to begin accordingly.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cholecystectomy; Revo; Robot surgery; Robotic surgical system; da Vinci

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27873012     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5357-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  12 in total

1.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study.

Authors:  D Nio; W A Bemelman; O R C Busch; B C Vrouenraets; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Gastrointestinal recovery and outcome after laparoscopy-assisted versus conventional open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Erito Mochiki; Toshihiro Nakabayashi; Hitoshi Kamimura; Norihiro Haga; Takayuki Asao; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-06-21       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Artificial tactile feedback can significantly improve tissue examination through remote palpation.

Authors:  Sebastian Schostek; Martin J Binser; Fabian Rieber; Chi-Nghia Ho; Marc O Schurr; Gerhard F Buess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic versus open enucleation for pancreatic neoplasms: clinical outcomes and pancreatic function analysis.

Authors:  Ren-Chao Zhang; Yu-Cheng Zhou; Yi-Ping Mou; Chao-Jie Huang; Wei-Wei Jin; Jia-Fei Yan; Yong-Xiang Wang; Yi Liao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Randomly alternating image presentation during laparoscopic training leads to faster automation to the "fulcrum effect".

Authors:  J A Jordan; A G Gallagher; J McGuigan; N McClure
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases.

Authors:  G B Cadière; J Himpens; O Germay; R Izizaw; M Degueldre; J Vandromme; E Capelluto; J Bruyns
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Z-G Zhou; M Hu; Y Li; W-Z Lei; Y-Y Yu; Z Cheng; L Li; Y Shu; T-C Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis: short- and middle-term results.

Authors:  G Belli; C Fantini; A D'Agostino; L Cioffi; S Langella; N Russolillo; A Belli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The learning curve: report of 50 patients.

Authors:  A Hawasli; L R Lloyd
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 0.688

10.  The first korean experience of telemanipulative robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the da vinci system.

Authors:  Chang Moo Kang; Hoon Sang Chi; Woo Jin Hyeung; Kyung Sik Kim; Jin Sub Choi; Woo Jung Lee; Byong Ro Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 2.759

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The future of robotic surgery.

Authors:  Andrew Brodie; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Robotic surgery: new robots and finally some real competition!

Authors:  Pradeep P Rao
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Cholecystectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system from Korea: the first clinical study.

Authors:  Jin Hong Lim; Woo Jung Lee; Seung Ho Choi; Chang Moo Kang
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-09-16

Review 4.  Robotic surgical systems in urology: What is currently available?

Authors:  Periklis Koukourikis; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.