Literature DB >> 32936390

Cholecystectomy using the Revo-i robotic surgical system from Korea: the first clinical study.

Jin Hong Lim1, Woo Jung Lee2, Seung Ho Choi3, Chang Moo Kang4.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of the newly developed Revo-i (Meerecompany, Yongin, Republic of Korea) robotic surgical system during robot-assisted cholecystectomy. This prospective, phase I clinical study involved 15 patients with gallbladder-related disease. The primary outcome evaluated was the intraoperative safety of the Revo-i; the secondary outcomes measured were the 30-day postoperative complications and patient satisfaction with the Revo-i's performance. Between August 17 and December 23, 2016, we performed 15 robot-assisted cholecystectomies. The operations were successfully completed, without any conversions to open or laparoscopic approaches. The mean patient age (53.07 years), mean operative time (115.3 ± 17.31 min [± standard deviation]), docking time (10.6 ± 3.16 min), console time (49.7 ± 15.41 min), actual dissection time (33.1 ± 10.53 min), and estimated blood loss (3.33 ± 6.17 mL) were determined. There were no intra- or postoperative complications, including gallbladder perforations. The mean hospital stay was 2.0 ± 1.00 days. Most patients reported satisfaction with the Revo-i's performance. Performing robot-assisted cholecystectomies using the Revo-i is feasible and safe. This report describes the first clinical study of the Revo-i robotic surgical system in human patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cholecystectomy; Revo-i; Robot; da Vinci

Year:  2020        PMID: 32936390     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00877-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  19 in total

1.  New technology and health care costs--the case of robot-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Gabriel I Barbash; Sherry A Glied
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role?

Authors:  Ashwin L deSouza; Leela M Prasad; John J Park; Slawomir J Marecik; Jennifer Blumetti; Herand Abcarian
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy with the REVO-I Robot Platform in Porcine Models.

Authors:  Dae Keun Kim; Dong Won Park; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Robotic thyroidectomy and neck dissection: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Jandee Lee; Woong Youn Chung
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.360

5.  A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery.

Authors:  Jeong Yeon Kim; Nam-Kyu Kim; Kang Young Lee; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Jang Hwan Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Reducing cost of surgery by avoiding complications: the model of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Monika E Hagen; Francois Pugin; Gilles Chassot; Olivier Huber; Nicolas Buchs; Pouya Iranmanesh; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Giacomo Novara; Vincenzo Ficarra; Raymond C Rosen; Walter Artibani; Anthony Costello; James A Eastham; Markus Graefen; Giorgio Guazzoni; Shahrokh F Shariat; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Hendrik Van Poppel; Filiberto Zattoni; Francesco Montorsi; Alexandre Mottrie; Timothy G Wilson
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Lori Weinberg; Sanjay Rao; Pedro F Escobar
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2011-11-28

10.  Robotic Cholecystectomy Using the Newly Developed Korean Robotic Surgical System, Revo-i: A Preclinical Experiment in a Porcine Model.

Authors:  Chang Moo Kang; Jae Uk Chong; Jin Hong Lim; Dong Won Park; Sung Jun Park; Suhyeon Gim; Hye Jin Ye; Se Hoon Kim; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.759

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Robotic Surgery: At the Crossroads of a Data Explosion.

Authors:  Tejinder P Singh; Jessica Zaman; Jessica Cutler
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Which one will you choose; open, laparoscopic, or robotic transduodenal ampullectomy?: a case report.

Authors:  Dawn Jung; Ji Eun Jung; Chang Moo Kang
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  Comparison of outcomes of single incision robotic cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sun Min Lee; Jin Hong Lim
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2021-02-28

4.  Study on the Application Effect of Fast Track Surgery Care Combined With Continuous Care After Discharge in Patients With Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jian Yu; Xiao Lin; Hong Chen
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.