Literature DB >> 11760751

Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases.

G B Cadière1, J Himpens, O Germay, R Izizaw, M Degueldre, J Vandromme, E Capelluto, J Bruyns.   

Abstract

Theoretically, in laparoscopic surgery, a computer interface in command of a mechanical system (robot) allows the surgeon: (1) to recover a number a number of lost degrees of freedom, thanks to intraabdominal articulations; (2) to obtain better visual control of instrument manipulation, thanks to three-dimensional vision; (3) to modulate the amplitude of surgical motions by downscaling and stabilization; (4) to work at a distance from the patient. These advances improve the quality of surgical tasks in a perfect ergonomic position. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the feasibility of utilizing a robot in laparoscopic surgery. The first robot-assisted procedure in humans was performed in March 1997 by our team. One hundred forty-six patients underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Between March 1997 and February 2001 a nonconsecutive series was performed of 39 antireflux procedures, 48 cholecystectomies, 28 tubal reanastomoses, 10 gastroplasties for obesity, 3 inguinal hernias, 3 intrarectal procedures, 2 hysterectomies, 2 cardiac procedures, 2 prostactectomies, 2 arteriovenous fistulas, 1 lumbar sympathectomy, 1 appendectomy, 1 laryngeal exploration, 1 varicocele ligation, 1 endometriosis cure, 1 neosalpingostomy, 1 deferent canal. The robot (Da Vinci system, Intuitive Surgical, Mountain View, CA), consists of a console and a cart with three articulated robot arms. The surgeon sits in front of the console, manipulating joysticklike handles while observing the operative field through binoculars that provide a three-dimensional picture. This computer is capable of modulating these data by eliminating physiologic tremor and by downscaling the amplitude of motions by a factor 5 or 3 to one. This study has demonstrated the feasibility of several laparoscopic robotic procedures. There is no morbidity related to the system. Operating time and the hospital stay were within acceptable limits. The system seems most beneficial in intra-abdominal microsurgery or for manipulations in a very small space. Optimized ergonomics and increased mobility of the instrument tips are beneficial in many steps of abdominal surgical procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11760751     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-001-0132-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  106 in total

1.  Robotic gastric banding in children and adolescents: a comparative study.

Authors:  Aayed Alqahtani
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Overview--current clinical and preclinical use of robotics for surgery.

Authors:  Mark A Talamini
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system.

Authors:  J D Hernandez; S D Bann; Y Munz; K Moorthy; V Datta; S Martin; A Dosis; F Bello; A Darzi; T Rockall
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study.

Authors:  D Nio; W A Bemelman; O R C Busch; B C Vrouenraets; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Robotic surgery: a current perspective.

Authors:  Anthony R Lanfranco; Andres E Castellanos; Jaydev P Desai; William C Meyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Manual robot assisted endoscopic suturing: time-action analysis in an experimental model.

Authors:  J P Ruurda; I A M J Broeders; B Pulles; F M Kappelhof; C van der Werken
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Early results of one-year robotic surgery using the Da Vinci system to perform advanced laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Ahmet Ayav; Laurent Bresler; Laurent Brunaud; Patrick Boissel
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Meta-analysis of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of rectal cancer.

Authors:  Shuang Lin; Hong-Gang Jiang; Zhi-Heng Chen; Shu-Yang Zhou; Xiao-Sun Liu; Ji-Ren Yu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Robot-assisted total gastrectomy is comparable with laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hong Man Yoon; Young-Woo Kim; Jun Ho Lee; Keun Won Ryu; Bang Wool Eom; Ji Yeon Park; Il Ju Choi; Chan Gyoo Kim; Jong Yeul Lee; Soo Jeong Cho; Ji Yoon Rho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Robotic and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: The Learning Curve of Robotic Surgery.

Authors:  Byung Hee Kang; Yi Xuan; Hoon Hur; Chang Wook Ahn; Yong Kwan Cho; Sang-Uk Han
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 3.720

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.