| Literature DB >> 27872571 |
Zeeshan Ahmad1, Shujaul Mulk Khan1, Elsayed Fathi Abd Allah2, Abdulaziz Abdullah Alqarawi2, Abeer Hashem3.
Abstract
Weeds are unwanted plant species growing in ordinary environment. In nature there are a total of 8000 weed species out of which 250 are important for agriculture world. The present study was carried out on weed species composition and distribution pattern with special reference to edaphic factor and farming practices in maize crop of District Mardan during the months of August and September, 2014. Quadrates methods were used to assess weed species distribution in relation to edaphic factor and farming practices. Phytosociological attributes such as frequency, relative frequency, density, relative density and Importance Values were measured by placing 9 quadrates (1 × 1 m2) randomly in each field. Initial results showed that the study area has 29 diverse weed species belonging to 27 genera and 15 families distributed in 585 quadrats. Presence and absence data sheet of 29 weed species and 65 fields were analyzed through PC-ORD version 5. Cluster and Two Way Cluster Analyses initiated four different weed communities with significant indicator species and with respect to underlying environmental variables using data attribute plots. Canonical Correspondence Analyses (CCA) of CANOCO software version 4.5 was used to assess the environmental gradients of weed species. It is concluded that among all the edaphic factors the strongest variables were higher concentration of potassium, organic matter and sandy nature of soil. CCA plots of both weed species and sampled fields based on questionnaire data concluded the farming practices such as application of fertilizers, irrigation and chemical spray were the main factors in determination of weed communities.Entities:
Keywords: Distribution pattern; Edaphic factors; Farming practices; Indicator species; Maize; Two Way Cluster Analyses; Weeds
Year: 2016 PMID: 27872571 PMCID: PMC5109493 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.07.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 1319-562X Impact factor: 4.219
Figure 1Two Way Cluster Analysis of 65 maize fields and 29 weed species through PC-ORD.
Summary table of Canonical Correspondence Analyses (CCA).
| Axes | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Total inertia |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigen values | 0.067 | 0.051 | 0.032 | 0.026 | 0.638 |
| Species-environment correlations | 0.721 | 0.767 | 0.680 | 0.665 | |
| Cumulative percentage variance of species data | 10.5 | 18.4 | 23.4 | 27.4 | |
| Species-environment relation | 26.4 | 46.6 | 59.1 | 69.3 | |
| Summary of Monte Carlo test (499 permutations under reduced model) | |||||
| Test of significance of first canonical axis | Test of significance of all canonical axes | ||||
| Eigen value | 0.067 | Trace | 0.252 | ||
| 4.906 | 1.250 | ||||
| 0.1100 | 0.0220 | ||||
Figure 2Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) diagram showing distribution of 65 fields in relation to various measured environmental variables with questionnaire and soil data respectively.
Figure 3Data attribute plot (from left to right) of Celosia argentea (1st indicator species), Convolvulus arvensis (2nd indicator species) and Euphorbia prostrata (3rd indicator species) showing its position in respect to different fields and associated environmental variables.
Figure 4Data attribute plot (From left to right) of Achyranthes aspera (1st indicator species), Ipomea purpuera (2nd indicator species) and Physalis angulata (3rd indicator species) in relation to various fields, soil and farming practices variables.
Figure 5Data attribute plot (From left to right) of Corchorus olitorius (1st indicator species), Lactuca dissecta (2nd indicator species) and Commelina benghalensis (3rd indicator species) presenting its position with environmental variables and various fields.
Figure 6Data attribute plot (from left to right) of Amaranthus viridis (1st indicator species), Euphorbia hirta (2nd indicator species) and Parthenium hysterophorus (3rd indicator species) showing its site in respect with different fields and related environmental variables.