| Literature DB >> 29379363 |
Waqas Khan1, Shujaul Mulk Khan2, Habib Ahmad3, Abdulaziz A Alqarawi4, Ghulam Mujtaba Shah1, Manzoor Hussain1, E F Abd Allah4,5.
Abstract
The life form and leaf size spectra of plant species of the Thandiani forests, district Abbottabad, were studied during the summer of 2013. These forests host 252 plant species of 97 families. Biological spectra showed that Hemicryptophytes (80 spp., 31.74%) were dominant followed by Megaphanerophytes (51 spp., 20.24%), Therophytes (49 spp., 19.44%) and Nanophanerophytes (45 spp., 17.86). Hemicryptophytes are the indicators of cold temperate vegetation. At the lower elevations, Megaphanerophytes and Nanophanerophytes were dominant which confirm trees as dominant habit form due to high soil depth, moisture and temperature factors. Data on Leaf spectra in the area showed that Microphyllous (88 spp., 34.92%) species were dominant followed by Leptophyllous (74 spp., 29.36%) and Nanophyllous (60 spp., 23.80%). The Microphyllous plants again are the indicator of cold temperate zone as the area is situated at an elevation of 1191-2626 m. Similarly, Nanophylls were dominant at lower elevations. Data on family importance values and diversity among various communities were also recorded. Life form and Leaf spectra studies could be used to understand the micro climatic variation of the region.Entities:
Keywords: Diversity; Family importance values; Forests; Leaf spectra; Life form; Plant species
Year: 2016 PMID: 29379363 PMCID: PMC5775072 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.11.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Age classes of woody species as defined on the basis of available data.
| Class | Range of diameter |
|---|---|
| 1 | 01–30 |
| 2 | 31–60 |
| 3 | 61–90 |
| 4 | 91–120 |
| 5 | 121–150 |
| 6 | 151–180 |
| 7 | 181–210 |
| 8 | 211–240 |
| 9 | 241–270 |
| 10 | 271–300 |
Life Form and Leaf Spectra classes of plants of Thandiani Sub Forests Division Abbottabad.
| S. no. | Life form | No. of species | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Megaphanerophytes | 51 | 20.24 |
| 2 | Nanophanerophytes | 45 | 17.86 |
| 3 | Chamaephytes | 02 | 00.79 |
| 4 | Hemicryptophytes | 80 | 31.74 |
| 5 | Geophytes | 20 | 07.93 |
| 6 | Therophytes | 49 | 19.44 |
| 7 | Lianas | 05 | 01.98 |
| Total | 252 | 100 | |
| S. no. | Leaf spectra | No. of species | % |
| 1 | Leptophylls | 74 | 29.36 |
| 2 | Nanophylls | 60 | 23.80 |
| 3 | Microphylls | 88 | 34.92 |
| 4 | Mesophylls | 30 | 11.90 |
| Total | 252 | 100 | |
Percentage of life form recorded from Thandiani forests, district Abbottabad during the summer of 2013.
| Ser. no. | Plant associations | Elevation (m) | T.S | Li | Ch | G | H | Mp | Np | Th | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | % | No | % | No | % | No | % | No | % | No | % | No | % | ||||
| 1 | 1200–1500 masl | 94 | 03 | 3.2 | 02 | 2.1 | 02 | 2.1 | 26 | 27.7 | 29 | 30.8 | 19 | 20.2 | 16 | 17 | |
| 2 | 1501–1800 masl | 174 | 03 | 1.7 | 02 | 1.1 | 11 | 6.3 | 51 | 29.3 | 41 | 23.6 | 34 | 19.5 | 33 | 18.9 | |
| 3 | 1801–2100 masl | 170 | 04 | 2.4 | 01 | 0.6 | 16 | 9.4 | 53 | 31.2 | 34 | 20 | 33 | 19.4 | 29 | 17 | |
| 4 | 2101–2350 masl | 142 | 02 | 1.4 | 01 | 0.7 | 15 | 10.6 | 47 | 33.1 | 22 | 15.5 | 32 | 22.5 | 23 | 16.2 | |
| 5 | 2351–2626 masl | 81 | 00 | 00 | 01 | 01.2 | 07 | 8.6 | 26 | 32 | 20 | 24.7 | 18 | 22.2 | 09 | 11.1 | |
T.S, Total species; Ch, Chamaephytes; G, Geophytes; H, Hemicryptophytes; Mp, Megaphanerophytes; Np, Nanophanerophytes; Th, Therophytes; Li, Lianas.
Percentage of leaf spectra recorded from Thandiani forests, district Abbottabad during 2012–2014.
| S. no. | Plant associations | Elevation (m) | T.S | Le | Me | Mi | N | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | % | No | % | No | % | No | % | ||||
| 1 | 1200–1500 masl | 94 | 24 | 25.5 | 13 | 13.8 | 40 | 42.5 | 17 | 18 | |
| 2 | 1501–1800 masl | 174 | 46 | 26.4 | 24 | 13.8 | 68 | 39.1 | 36 | 20.7 | |
| 3 | 1801–2100 masl | 170 | 51 | 30 | 22 | 12.9 | 57 | 33.5 | 40 | 23.5 | |
| 4 | 2101–2350 masl | 142 | 44 | 31 | 16 | 11.3 | 48 | 33.8 | 34 | 23.9 | |
| 5 | 2351–2626 masl | 81 | 25 | 30.8 | 19 | 23.5 | 28 | 34.6 | 09 | 11 | |
T.S, Total species; Le, Leptophylls; Me, Megaphylls; Mi, Microphylls; N, Nanophylls.
Regeneration capacity of important tree species of Thandiani Sub Forests Division, Abbottabad.
| S. no. | Age classes | 0–30 | 31–60 | 61–90 | 91–120 | 121–150 | 151–180 | 181–210 | 211–240 | 241–270 | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 9 | 97 | 6 | 5 | R | |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | D | |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 0 | D | |
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 0 | R | |
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 20 | 35 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | D | |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 11 | 3 | 0 | R | |
| 7 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | D | |
| 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 14 | 13 | 13 | 6 | 0 | R | |
| 9 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 34 | 63 | 64 | 48 | 21 | 26 | R | |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | D | |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 19 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 0 | R | |
| 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 14 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 0 | R |
R, Regenerative; D = Dying.
Similarity Index and Dissimilarity Index of different plant communities of Thandiani Sub Forests Division, Abbottabad.
| 33.58 | 58.94 | 69.49 | 73.72 | ||
| 66.42 | 26.53 | 45.57 | 58.43 | ||
| 41.06 | 73.47 | 31.83 | 54.4 | ||
| 30.51 | 54.43 | 68.17 | 57.85 | ||
| 26.28 | 41.57 | 45.6 | 42.15 |
Family Importance Value of 10 highest & 10 least families of Thandiani Sub Forests Division, Abbottabad.
| S. no. | Highest families | No. of species | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pinaceae | 5 | 12.58 |
| 2 | Rosaceae | 20 | 9.83 |
| 3 | Ranunculaceae | 12 | 5.1 |
| 4 | Papilionaceae | 9 | 4.9 |
| 5 | Polygonaceae | 5 | 4.6 |
| 6 | Poaceae | 5 | 3.6 |
| 7 | Asteraceae | 14 | 3.3 |
| 8 | Plantaginaceae | 3 | 2.8 |
| 9 | Euphorbiaceae | 4 | 2.7 |
| 10 | Caprifoliaceae | 6 | 2.6 |
| S. no. | Rarest families | No. of species | % |
| 1 | Acanthaceae | 1 | 0.00085 |
| 2 | Asclepiadaceae | 1 | 0.013 |
| 3 | Dioscoreaceae | 1 | 0.031 |
| 4 | Apocynaceae | 1 | 0.032 |
| 5 | Taxaceae | 1 | 0.033 |
| 6 | Hypericaceae | 2 | 0.041 |
| 7 | Myrsinaceae | 1 | 0.042 |
| 8 | Staphyliaceae | 1 | 0.044 |
| 9 | Scheuchzeriaceae | 1 | 0.045 |
| 10 | Hamamelidaceae | 1 | 0.052 |
F.I.V., Family Importance Value.