| Literature DB >> 30505179 |
Mardi Mohammed Algandaby1, Salama M El-Darier2.
Abstract
Germination bioassay was carried out to test the biological activity of Achillea santolina L. (ASAE), Artemisia monosperma Del. (AMAE), Pituranthus tortuosus L. (PTAE) and Thymus capitatus L. (TCAE) aqueous extracts (collected from Taif region, KSA) on germination percentage (GP), plumule (PL) and radicle (RL) lengths (mm) besides seedling dry weight (SDW) (mg/seedlings) of Medicago polymorpha L. The inhibitory effect of P. tortuosus was insignificant compared to the other three donor species which attained the strongest allelopathic potential in the following order: A. santolina > A. monosperma > T. capitatus. Growth experiment using crude powder of the four donor species was conducted to examine their effects on leaf area index (LAI), photosynthetic pigments, total available carbohydrates (TAC) and total protein (TP). It is worth mentioning that each of the four donor species crude powders mixed with clay loam soil appeared to have a great inhibitory allelopathic effect on LAI, total photosynthetic pigment and chlorophyll a (Chl a) while carotenoids exhibited a slight increase with the application of the four donor species crude powders. TAC and TP were significantly decreased with increasing the crude powder concentrations while a slight decrease was recorded for carbon/nitrogen (C/N) ratio. There is possibility of using these allelochemicals directly or as structural leads for the discovery and development of environmentally friendly herbicides to control weeds. The study recommended that these species must be phytochemically examined in future for their allelochemicals in order to provide information on the possibilities of using one or more of these species as bioherbicides.Entities:
Keywords: Achillea santolina; Artemisia monosperma; Bioherbicides; Pituranthus tortuosus; Thymus capitatus
Year: 2016 PMID: 30505179 PMCID: PMC6251993 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.02.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Determination of some physical and chemical properties ± SD of soil collected from at Taif region (KSA) during the year of 2015.
| Character | Mean ± SD |
|---|---|
| pH | 7.4 ± 1.5 |
| EC (mmhos cm−1) | 3.5 ± 0.6 |
| OM (%) | 2.3 ± 0.4 |
| OC (%) | 1.7 ± 0.1 |
| CaCO3 (%) | 23.8 ± 3.2 |
| Total N | 65 ± 5.6 |
| P+++ | 1.2 ± 0.2 |
| K+ | 67 ± 6.1 |
| Ca++ | 125 ± 7.2 |
| Mg++ | 23.4 ± 2.5 |
| Na+ | 90.8 ± 5.3 |
| Cl− | 100.7 ± 6.3 |
| HCO3− | 9.20 ± 2.1 |
| Sand % | 53 ± 5 |
| Silt % | 30 ± 3 |
| Clay % | 17 ± 2 |
Data are means of 5 replicates ± SD.
EC: electrical conductivity, OM: organic matter, OC: organic carbon.
Qualitative phytochemical screening of the four donor species collected from different locations at Taif region (KSA) during the year of 2015.
| Chemical group | Plant species | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alkaloids | + | + | − | − |
| Coumarins | − | − | ++ | − |
| Essential oil | ++ | +++ | ++ | +++ |
| Flavonoids | ++ + | +++ | + | ++ |
| Glycosides | ++ | ++ | + | ++ |
| Total phenols | ++ | ++++ | + | +++ |
| Saponins | ++ | + | − | + |
| Sterols | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| Tannins | + | + | + | + |
+: detected, −: not detected.
The notations, ++++, +++, ++, + and − refer to highly appreciable amounts (positive within <2 min); appreciable amounts (positive within 5 min), moderate amounts (positive after 5 min but within 10 min); trace amounts (positive after 10 min but within 15 min) and completely absent, respectively.
Variation in the content of total flavonoids and total phenolics (mg/100 g dw) as well as essential oils (%) detected in the four donor species collected from different locations at Taif region (KSA) during the year of 2015.
| Chemical group | Plant species | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total flavonoids | 824 ± 24 | 937 ± 32 | 246 ± 12 | 500 ± 18 |
| Total phenolics | 2672 ± 56 | 6935 ± 87 | 1057 ± 29 | 3842 ± 64 |
| Essential oil | 0.65 ± 0.01 | 2.00 ± 0.12 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 1.00 ± 0.07 |
Data are means of three replicates ± SD.
Total flavonoids were determined as rutin and total phenolics as chlorogenic acid.
A quantitative analysis of each essential oil component was carried out by peak area normalization measurement.
Suppression effect of aqueous extracts from different medicinal plants on germination percentage (GP) of Medicago polymorpha.
| Treatment (%) | Plant species | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 84a ± 2 | 89a ± 2 | 82a ± 4 | 90a ± 2 |
| 5 | 49b ± 3 | 55b ± 2 | 67b ± 3 | 50b ± 1 |
| 10 | 35c ± 2 | 38c ± 3 | 64c ± 1 | 40c ± 1 |
| 15 | 13d ± 2 | 17d ± 1 | 57d ± 4 | 25d ± 3 |
| 20 | 0.0e | 0.0e | 44e ± 2 | 20e ± 2 |
Data are means of 5 replicates ± SD.
Different letters within each column indicate a significant difference at P < 0.05 level of probability as evaluated by one-way ANOVA test.
Suppression effect of aqueous extracts from different medicinal plants on plumule (PL) and radicle (RL) lengths (mm) of Medicago polymorpha.
| Treatment(%) | Plant species | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PL | RL | PL | RL | PL | RL | PL | RL | |
| 0 | 41a ± 4 | 70a ± 6 | 46a ± 4 | 75a ± 6 | 49a ± 4 | 78a ± 6 | 41a ± 4 | 70a ± 6 |
| 5 | 26b ± 2 | 35b ± 3 | 29b ± 3 | 38b ± 3 | 29b ± 3 | 39b ± 4 | 32b ± 2 | 51b ± 4 |
| 10 | 14c ± 2 | 24c ± 3 | 18c ± 2 | 28c ± 2 | 23c ± 3 | 32c ± 3 | 26c ± 3 | 38c ± 5 |
| 15 | 9d ± 1 | 10d ± 1 | 12d ± 2 | 18d ± 2 | 16d ± 2 | 22d ± 3 | 20d ± 3 | 31d ± 4 |
| 20 | 0.0e | 0.0e | 0.0e | 0.0e | 9e ± 2 | 10e ± 2 | 10e ± 1 | 9e ± 1 |
Data are means of 5 replicates ± SD.
Different letters within each column indicate a significant difference at P < 0.05 level of probability as evaluated by one-way ANOVA test.
Figure 1Suppression effect of aqueous extracts from different medicinal plants on seedling dry weight (SDW) (mg/seedling) of Medicago polymorpha. Vertical bar above each column represents SD.
Figure 2Suppression effect of crude powders from different medicinal plants on leaf area index (LAI) (cm2/cm2) of Medicago polymorpha. Vertical bar above each column represents SD.
Suppression effect of crude powders from different medicinal plants on pigment content ± SD of Medicago polymorpha.
| Donor species | Treatment (%) | Chlorophyll fractions | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chl a | Chl b | Carot | Total | ||
| 0 | 15.66a ± 2.1 | 5.89a ± 0.5 | 0.92b ± 0.01 | 22.47a ± 1.3 | |
| 4 | 7.23b ± 1.4 | 2.81b ± 0.2 | 2.15a ± 0.03 | 12.19b ± 0.9 | |
| 8 | 6.24c ± 1.2 | 1.93c ± 0.1 | 2.66a ± 0.02 | 10.83c ± 1.3 | |
| 0 | 15.66a ± 2 | 5.89a ± 0.4 | 0.92c ± 0.01 | 22.47a ± 1.7 | |
| 4 | 9.21b ± 1.5 | 3.32b ± 0.6 | 1.98b ± 0.1 | 14.51b ± 1.7 | |
| 8 | 6.86c ± 1.2 | 2.00c ± 0.2 | 3.34a ± 0.3 | 12.20c ± 2 | |
| 0 | 15.66a ± 1.6 | 6.62a ± 1 | 0.92b ± 0.04 | 22.47a ± 2.6 | |
| 4 | 14.85b ± 1.4 | 5.89b ± 1.1 | 1.14ab ± 0.01 | 21.88b ± 1.5 | |
| 8 | 9.85c ± 2 | 3.87c ± 0.9 | 1.78a ± 0.2 | 15.50c ± 2 | |
| 0 | 15.66a ± 2.1 | 5.89a ± 0.6 | 0.92b ± 0.02 | 22.47a ± 1.3 | |
| 4 | 8.95b ± 2 | 4.42b ± 0.5 | 2.20a ± 0.02 | 15.57b ± 1.4 | |
| 8 | 7.01c ± 1.6 | 3.56c ± 0.8 | 2.83a ± 0.1 | 13.40c ± 1.2 | |
Data are means of 5 replicates ± SD.
Chl a: chlorophyll a.
Chl b: chlorophyll b.
Carot: carotenoids.
Different letters within each column and receptor species indicate a significant difference at P < 0.05 level of probability as evaluated by one-way ANOVA test.
Figure 3Suppression effect of crude powders from different medicinal plants on total available carbohydrates (TAC), total proteins (TP) as well as C/N ratio of Medicago polymorpha. Vertical bar above each column represents SD.