Literature DB >> 15911656

Treatment of deep infection of the hip associated with massive bone loss: two-stage revision with an antibiotic-loaded interim cement prosthesis followed by reconstruction with allograft.

P-H Hsieh1, C-H Shih, Y-H Chang, M S Lee, W-E Yang, H-N Shih.   

Abstract

We have carried out in 24 patients, a two-stage revision arthroplasty of the hip for infection with massive bone loss. We used a custom-made, antibiotic-loaded cement prosthesis as an interim spacer. Fifteen patients had acetabular deficiencies, eight had segmental femoral bone loss and one had a combined defect. There was no recurrence of infection at a mean follow-up of 4.2 years (2 to 7). A total of 21 patients remained mobile in the interim period. The mean Merle D'Aubigné and Postel hip score improved from 7.3 points before operation to 13.2 between stages and to 15.8 at the final follow-up. The allograft appeared to have incorporated into the host bone in all patients. Complications included two fractures and one dislocation of the cement prosthesis. The use of a temporary spacer maintains the function of the joint between stages even when there is extensive loss of bone. Allograft used in revision surgery after septic conditions restores bone stock without the risk of recurrent infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15911656     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B6.15411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  27 in total

Review 1.  Infection in total hip replacement: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Surendra Senthi; Jacob T Munro; Rocco P Pitto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  A technique for the fabrication of a reinforced moulded articulating cement spacer in two-stage revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew Kent; Rajesh Rachha; Manoj Sood
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Should well-fixed uncemented femoral components be revised in infected hip arthroplasty? Report of five trial cases.

Authors:  Kiyokazu Fukui; Ayumi Kaneuji; Syusuke Ueda; Tadami Matsumoto
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-01

4.  Sufficient release of antibiotic by a spacer 6 weeks after implantation in two-stage revision of infected hip prostheses.

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Sebastian Vogt; Martin Reinsch; Hubert Büchner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Pre-operative scoring system to determine the surgical strategy for periprosthetic hip infection.

Authors:  Kenichi Oe; Hirokazu Iida; Narumi Ueda; Tomohisa Nakamura; Naofumi Okamoto; Yusuke Ueda
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  [Replacement of infected knee and hip endoprostheses].

Authors:  M Militz; V Bühren
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  [Periprosthetic infection].

Authors:  C Perka; N Haas
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  The effect of endoskeleton on antibiotic impregnated cement spacer for treating deep hip infection.

Authors:  Kuo-Ti Peng; Liang-Tseng Kuo; Wei-Hsiu Hsu; Tsan-Wen Huang; Yao-Hung Tsai
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  One-stage cementless revision arthroplasty for infected hip replacements.

Authors:  Jeong Joon Yoo; Young Sam Kwon; Kyung-Hoi Koo; Kang Sup Yoon; Young-Min Kim; Hee Joong Kim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  Revision of late periprosthetic infections of total hip endoprostheses: pros and cons of different concepts.

Authors:  Bernd Fink
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.