Literature DB >> 28550428

Partial component-retained two-stage reconstruction for chronic infection after uncemented total hip arthroplasty: results of sixteen cases after five years of follow-up.

Kun-Hui Chen1,2, Shang-Wen Tsai1,2, Po-Kuei Wu1,2, Cheng-Fong Chen1,2, Hsin-Yi Wang2,3, Wei-Ming Chen4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Two-stage reconstruction with total implant removal and re-implantation after infection control is considered the gold standard treatment for infection after hip arthroplasty. However, removal of the well-fixed stem or cup may cause substantial bone loss and other complications, thereby making reconstruction difficult. We evaluated whether an infection post total hip arthroplasty can be treated without removal of the radiographically and clinically well-fixed femoral stem or acetabular cup.
METHODS: Patients with a chronic infection after total hip arthroplasty, with a radiographically well-fixed, cementless stem or cup, were selected. During the first surgical stage, we retained the stem or cup if we were unable to remove these with a stem or cup extractor. An antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer was then implanted. After control of infection (C-reactive protein level within normal value), we performed the second stage of re-implantation surgery. Treatment failure was defined as uncontrolled infection requiring removal of the retained implant.
RESULTS: From January 2004 to December 2013, 16 patients underwent partial component-retained two stage reconstruction. Thirteen patients (81.3%) were free of infection, with a mean follow-up time of five years. The remaining three patients, who had high-risk comorbidities and, of whom, two were infected by high-virulence organisms, had uncontrolled infection and required further surgery to remove the retained implant.
CONCLUSIONS: Partial component-retained two-stage reconstruction could be an alternative treatment option for chronic infection after an uncemented total hip arthroplasty with a radiographically and clinically well-fixed component in selected patients, who are not immunocompromised and are infected by a low-virulence organism.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Hip replacement; Periprosthetic joint infection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28550428     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3505-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  25 in total

1.  Retaining well-fixed cementless stem in the treatment of infected hip arthroplasty--reply.

Authors:  Kee Haeng Lee
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.717

2.  Extended proximal femoral osteotomy. A new technique for femoral revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  T I Younger; M S Bradford; R E Magnus; W G Paprosky
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Partial two-stage exchange of the infected total hip replacement using disposable spacer moulds.

Authors:  A V Lombardi; K R Berend; J B Adams
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Results of isolated femoral component revision with well-fixed acetabular implant retention.

Authors:  Kyung Soon Park; Taek Rim Yoon; Eun Kyoo Song; Keun Bae Lee
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Does the ingrowth surface make a difference? A retrieval study of 423 cementless acetabular components.

Authors:  Eric Swarts; Thomas A Bucher; Michael Phillips; Francis H X Yap
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  The Role of Highly Selective Implant Retention in the Infected Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Moataz El-Husseiny; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Pathogen-driven decision for implant retention in the management of infected total knee prostheses.

Authors:  Line Zürcher-Pfund; Ilker Uçkay; Laurence Legout; Axel Gamulin; Pierre Vaudaux; Robin Peter
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Imaging of the Painful Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rikin Hargunani; Hardi Madani; Michael Khoo; Anastasia Fotiadou; Ian Pressney; Michele Calleja; Paul O'Donnell
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.248

Review 9.  The fate of acute methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus periprosthetic knee infections treated by open debridement and retention of components.

Authors:  Thomas Bradbury; Thomas K Fehring; Michael Taunton; Arlen Hanssen; Khalid Azzam; Javad Parvizi; Susan M Odum
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Retaining well-fixed cementless stem in the treatment of infected hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Lee; Kee Haeng Lee; Jae-Hwi Nho; Yong-Chan Ha; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  9 in total

1.  Citations, non-citations and visibility of International Orthopaedics in 2017.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Andrew Quaile; Marko Pećina; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Partial component-retained two-stage reconstruction for chronic infection after uncemented total hip arthroplasty: good or bad?

Authors:  Zuyun Yan; Rui Fang; Tang Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Hip and Knee Section, Treatment, Surgical Technique: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections.

Authors:  Moneer M Abouljoud; David Backstein; Andrew Battenberg; Matthew Dietz; Alejo Erice; Andrew A Freiberg; Jeffrey Granger; Adam Katchky; Anton Khlopas; Tae-Kyun Kim; Per Kjaersgaard-Andersen; Kyung-Hoi Koo; Yona Kosashvili; Percia Lazarovski; Jennifer Leighton; Adolph Lombardi; Konstantinos Malizos; Jorge Manrique; Michael A Mont; Marianthe Papanagiotoy; Rafael J Sierra; Nipun Sodhi; John Stammers; Maik Stiehler; Timothy L Tan; Katsufumi Uchiyama; Derek Ward; Anna Ziogkou
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Hip Spacers in Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Alessandro Rava; Matteo Bruzzone; Umberto Cottino; Emilio Enrietti; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2019-10-11

5.  Modification of the Polymer of a Bone Cement with Biodegradable Microspheres of PLGA and Loading with Daptomycin and Vancomycin Improve the Response to Bone Tissue Infection.

Authors:  Joaquin García-García; Galo Azuara; Oscar Fraile-Martinez; Cielo García-Montero; Miguel Angel Álvarez-Mon; Sara Ruíz-Díez; Melchor Álvarez-Mon; Julia Buján; Natalio García-Honduvilla; Miguel A Ortega; Basilio De la Torre
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.329

6.  Uncemented versus cemented total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients with osteoporosis: A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Xiang Zhou; Meiji Chen; Weiguang Yu; Guowei Han; Junxing Ye; Jintao Zhuang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  A new perspective on current prosthetic joint infection classifications: introducing topography as a key factor affecting treatment strategy.

Authors:  Antonio Pellegrini; Claudio Legnani; Enzo Meani
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Staged Revision of Infected-hip Arthroplasty Using an Antibiotics-loaded Intra-articular Cement Spacer: Impact on Cemented and Cementless Stem Retention.

Authors:  Kyu-Sub Um; Joong-Won Lee; Byung-Ho Yoon; Yerl-Bo Sung
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2020-02-26

9.  Cemented versus uncemented total hip replacement for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a retrospective, multicentre study with a mean 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Shuai Mao; Baomin Chen; Ying Zhu; Liang Qian; Jinluan Lin; Xinchao Zhang; Weiguang Yu; Guowei Han
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.