Kun-Hui Chen1,2, Shang-Wen Tsai1,2, Po-Kuei Wu1,2, Cheng-Fong Chen1,2, Hsin-Yi Wang2,3, Wei-Ming Chen4,5. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No 201, Sec 2, Shipai Rd, Beitou District, Taipei, Taiwan, 11217, Republic of China. 2. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, No.155, Sec.2, Linong Street, Beitou District, Taipei, Taiwan, 11217, Republic of China. 3. Department of Anaesthesiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No 201, Sec 2, Shipai Rd, Beitou District, Taipei, Taiwan, 11217, Republic of China. 4. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, No 201, Sec 2, Shipai Rd, Beitou District, Taipei, Taiwan, 11217, Republic of China. wmc2499@gmail.com. 5. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, No.155, Sec.2, Linong Street, Beitou District, Taipei, Taiwan, 11217, Republic of China. wmc2499@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Two-stage reconstruction with total implant removal and re-implantation after infection control is considered the gold standard treatment for infection after hip arthroplasty. However, removal of the well-fixed stem or cup may cause substantial bone loss and other complications, thereby making reconstruction difficult. We evaluated whether an infection post total hip arthroplasty can be treated without removal of the radiographically and clinically well-fixed femoral stem or acetabular cup. METHODS: Patients with a chronic infection after total hip arthroplasty, with a radiographically well-fixed, cementless stem or cup, were selected. During the first surgical stage, we retained the stem or cup if we were unable to remove these with a stem or cup extractor. An antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer was then implanted. After control of infection (C-reactive protein level within normal value), we performed the second stage of re-implantation surgery. Treatment failure was defined as uncontrolled infection requiring removal of the retained implant. RESULTS: From January 2004 to December 2013, 16 patients underwent partial component-retained two stage reconstruction. Thirteen patients (81.3%) were free of infection, with a mean follow-up time of five years. The remaining three patients, who had high-risk comorbidities and, of whom, two were infected by high-virulence organisms, had uncontrolled infection and required further surgery to remove the retained implant. CONCLUSIONS: Partial component-retained two-stage reconstruction could be an alternative treatment option for chronic infection after an uncemented total hip arthroplasty with a radiographically and clinically well-fixed component in selected patients, who are not immunocompromised and are infected by a low-virulence organism.
PURPOSE: Two-stage reconstruction with total implant removal and re-implantation after infection control is considered the gold standard treatment for infection after hip arthroplasty. However, removal of the well-fixed stem or cup may cause substantial bone loss and other complications, thereby making reconstruction difficult. We evaluated whether an infection post total hip arthroplasty can be treated without removal of the radiographically and clinically well-fixed femoral stem or acetabular cup. METHODS:Patients with a chronic infection after total hip arthroplasty, with a radiographically well-fixed, cementless stem or cup, were selected. During the first surgical stage, we retained the stem or cup if we were unable to remove these with a stem or cup extractor. An antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer was then implanted. After control of infection (C-reactive protein level within normal value), we performed the second stage of re-implantation surgery. Treatment failure was defined as uncontrolled infection requiring removal of the retained implant. RESULTS: From January 2004 to December 2013, 16 patients underwent partial component-retained two stage reconstruction. Thirteen patients (81.3%) were free of infection, with a mean follow-up time of five years. The remaining three patients, who had high-risk comorbidities and, of whom, two were infected by high-virulence organisms, had uncontrolled infection and required further surgery to remove the retained implant. CONCLUSIONS: Partial component-retained two-stage reconstruction could be an alternative treatment option for chronic infection after an uncemented total hip arthroplasty with a radiographically and clinically well-fixed component in selected patients, who are not immunocompromised and are infected by a low-virulence organism.
Entities:
Keywords:
Arthroplasty; Hip replacement; Periprosthetic joint infection
Authors: Line Zürcher-Pfund; Ilker Uçkay; Laurence Legout; Axel Gamulin; Pierre Vaudaux; Robin Peter Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2013-05-22 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Thomas Bradbury; Thomas K Fehring; Michael Taunton; Arlen Hanssen; Khalid Azzam; Javad Parvizi; Susan M Odum Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2009-06-24 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Moneer M Abouljoud; David Backstein; Andrew Battenberg; Matthew Dietz; Alejo Erice; Andrew A Freiberg; Jeffrey Granger; Adam Katchky; Anton Khlopas; Tae-Kyun Kim; Per Kjaersgaard-Andersen; Kyung-Hoi Koo; Yona Kosashvili; Percia Lazarovski; Jennifer Leighton; Adolph Lombardi; Konstantinos Malizos; Jorge Manrique; Michael A Mont; Marianthe Papanagiotoy; Rafael J Sierra; Nipun Sodhi; John Stammers; Maik Stiehler; Timothy L Tan; Katsufumi Uchiyama; Derek Ward; Anna Ziogkou Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Joaquin García-García; Galo Azuara; Oscar Fraile-Martinez; Cielo García-Montero; Miguel Angel Álvarez-Mon; Sara Ruíz-Díez; Melchor Álvarez-Mon; Julia Buján; Natalio García-Honduvilla; Miguel A Ortega; Basilio De la Torre Journal: Polymers (Basel) Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 4.329