Jan Caspar Peeken1, Fridtjof Nüsslin2, Stephanie E Combs2,3. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München, Germany. jan.peeken@tum.de. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München (TUM), Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, München, Germany. 3. Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, 85764, Neuherberg, Germany.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Radiomics, a recently introduced concept, describes quantitative computerized algorithm-based feature extraction from imaging data including computer tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRT), or positron-emission tomography (PET) images. For radiation oncology it offers the potential to significantly influence clinical decision-making and thus therapy planning and follow-up workflow. METHODS: After image acquisition, image preprocessing, and defining regions of interest by structure segmentation, algorithms are applied to calculate shape, intensity, texture, and multiscale filter features. By combining multiple features and correlating them with clinical outcome, prognostic models can be created. RESULTS: Retrospective studies have proposed radiomics classifiers predicting, e. g., overall survival, radiation treatment response, distant metastases, or radiation-related toxicity. Besides, radiomics features can be correlated with genomic information ("radiogenomics") and could be used for tumor characterization. DISCUSSION: Distinct patterns based on data-based as well as genomics-based features will influence radiation oncology in the future. Individualized treatments in terms of dose level adaption and target volume definition, as well as other outcome-related parameters will depend on radiomics and radiogenomics. By integration of various datasets, the prognostic power can be increased making radiomics a valuable part of future precision medicine approaches. CONCLUSION: This perspective demonstrates the evidence for the radiomics concept in radiation oncology. The necessity of further studies to integrate radiomics classifiers into clinical decision-making and the radiation therapy workflow is emphasized.
INTRODUCTION: Radiomics, a recently introduced concept, describes quantitative computerized algorithm-based feature extraction from imaging data including computer tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRT), or positron-emission tomography (PET) images. For radiation oncology it offers the potential to significantly influence clinical decision-making and thus therapy planning and follow-up workflow. METHODS: After image acquisition, image preprocessing, and defining regions of interest by structure segmentation, algorithms are applied to calculate shape, intensity, texture, and multiscale filter features. By combining multiple features and correlating them with clinical outcome, prognostic models can be created. RESULTS: Retrospective studies have proposed radiomics classifiers predicting, e. g., overall survival, radiation treatment response, distant metastases, or radiation-related toxicity. Besides, radiomics features can be correlated with genomic information ("radiogenomics") and could be used for tumor characterization. DISCUSSION: Distinct patterns based on data-based as well as genomics-based features will influence radiation oncology in the future. Individualized treatments in terms of dose level adaption and target volume definition, as well as other outcome-related parameters will depend on radiomics and radiogenomics. By integration of various datasets, the prognostic power can be increased making radiomics a valuable part of future precision medicine approaches. CONCLUSION: This perspective demonstrates the evidence for the radiomics concept in radiation oncology. The necessity of further studies to integrate radiomics classifiers into clinical decision-making and the radiation therapy workflow is emphasized.
Authors: Jacobus Fa Jansen; Yonggang Lu; Gaorav Gupta; Nancy Y Lee; Hilda E Stambuk; Yousef Mazaheri; Joseph O Deasy; Amita Shukla-Dave Journal: World J Radiol Date: 2016-01-28
Authors: Philipp Kickingereder; David Bonekamp; Martha Nowosielski; Annekathrin Kratz; Martin Sill; Sina Burth; Antje Wick; Oliver Eidel; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Alexander Radbruch; Jürgen Debus; Christel Herold-Mende; Andreas Unterberg; David Jones; Stefan Pfister; Wolfgang Wick; Andreas von Deimling; Martin Bendszus; David Capper Journal: Radiology Date: 2016-09-16 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Gary J R Cook; Connie Yip; Muhammad Siddique; Vicky Goh; Sugama Chicklore; Arunabha Roy; Paul Marsden; Shahreen Ahmad; David Landau Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-11-30 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Ke Nie; Liming Shi; Qin Chen; Xi Hu; Salma K Jabbour; Ning Yue; Tianye Niu; Xiaonan Sun Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: David A Gutman; Lee A D Cooper; Scott N Hwang; Chad A Holder; Jingjing Gao; Tarun D Aurora; William D Dunn; Lisa Scarpace; Tom Mikkelsen; Rajan Jain; Max Wintermark; Manal Jilwan; Prashant Raghavan; Erich Huang; Robert J Clifford; Pattanasak Mongkolwat; Vladimir Kleper; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Pascal O Zinn; Carlos S Moreno; Carl Jaffe; Rivka Colen; Daniel L Rubin; Joel Saltz; Adam Flanders; Daniel J Brat Journal: Radiology Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Xenia Fave; Dennis Mackin; Jinzhong Yang; Joy Zhang; David Fried; Peter Balter; David Followill; Daniel Gomez; A Kyle Jones; Francesco Stingo; Jonas Fontenot; Laurence Court Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Jan C Peeken; Josefine Hesse; Bernhard Haller; Kerstin A Kessel; Fridtjof Nüsslin; Stephanie E Combs Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2018-02-13 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Norbert Galldiks; Karl-Josef Langen; Nathalie L Albert; Marc Chamberlain; Riccardo Soffietti; Michelle M Kim; Ian Law; Emilie Le Rhun; Susan Chang; Julian Schwarting; Stephanie E Combs; Matthias Preusser; Peter Forsyth; Whitney Pope; Michael Weller; Jörg C Tonn Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2019-05-06 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Kerstin Zwirner; Daniela Thorwarth; René M Winter; Stefan Welz; Jakob Weiss; Nina F Schwenzer; Holger Schmidt; Christian la Fougère; Konstantin Nikolaou; Daniel Zips; Sergios Gatidis Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Norbert Galldiks; Martin Kocher; Garry Ceccon; Jan-Michael Werner; Anna Brunn; Martina Deckert; Whitney B Pope; Riccardo Soffietti; Emilie Le Rhun; Michael Weller; Jörg C Tonn; Gereon R Fink; Karl-Josef Langen Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2020-01-11 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Jan C Peeken; Tatyana Goldberg; Christoph Knie; Basil Komboz; Michael Bernhofer; Francesco Pasa; Kerstin A Kessel; Pouya D Tafti; Burkhard Rost; Fridtjof Nüsslin; Andreas E Braun; Stephanie E Combs Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 3.621