Literature DB >> 27852770

Environmental Anchoring of Head Direction in a Computational Model of Retrosplenial Cortex.

Andrej Bicanski1,2, Neil Burgess1,2.   

Abstract

Allocentric (world-centered) spatial codes driven by path integration accumulate error unless reset by environmental sensory inputs that are necessarily egocentric (body-centered). Previous models of the head direction system avoided the necessary transformation between egocentric and allocentric reference frames by placing visual cues at infinity. Here we present a model of head direction coding that copes with exclusively proximal cues by making use of a conjunctive representation of head direction and location in retrosplenial cortex. Egocentric landmark bearing of proximal cues, which changes with location, is mapped onto this retrosplenial representation. The model avoids distortions due to parallax, which occur in simple models when a single proximal cue card is used, and can also accommodate multiple cues, suggesting how it can generalize to arbitrary sensory environments. It provides a functional account of the anatomical distribution of head direction cells along Papez' circuit, of place-by-direction coding in retrosplenial cortex, the anatomical connection from the anterior thalamic nuclei to retrosplenial cortex, and the involvement of retrosplenial cortex in navigation. In addition to parallax correction, the same mechanism allows for continuity of head direction coding between connected environments, and shows how a head direction representation can be stabilized by a single within arena cue. We also make predictions for drift during exploration of a new environment, the effects of hippocampal lesions on retrosplenial cells, and on head direction coding in differently shaped environments. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The activity of head direction cells signals the direction of an animal's head relative to landmarks in the world. Although driven by internal estimates of head movements, head direction cells must be kept aligned to the external world by sensory inputs, which arrive in the reference frame of the sensory receptors. We present a computational model, which proposes that sensory inputs are correctly associated to head directions by virtue of a conjunctive representation of place and head directions in the retrosplenial cortex. The model allows for a stable head direction signal, even when the sensory input from nearby cues changes dramatically whenever the animal moves to a different location, and enables stable representations of head direction across connected environments.
Copyright © 2016 Bicanski and Burgess.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Papez’ circuit; attractor networks; head direction cells; parallax; place cells; retrosplenial cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27852770      PMCID: PMC5125222          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0516-16.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  86 in total

1.  Head direction cells in rats with hippocampal or overlying neocortical lesions: evidence for impaired angular path integration.

Authors:  E J Golob; J S Taube
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons.

Authors:  J O'Keefe; N Burgess
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The anterior thalamic head-direction signal is abolished by bilateral but not unilateral lesions of the lateral mammillary nucleus.

Authors:  H T Blair; J Cho; P E Sharp
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Disruption of the head direction cell signal after occlusion of the semicircular canals in the freely moving chinchilla.

Authors:  Gary M Muir; Joel E Brown; John P Carey; Timo P Hirvonen; Charles C Della Santina; Lloyd B Minor; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Interaction of egocentric and world-centered reference frames in the rat posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Aaron A Wilber; Benjamin J Clark; Tyler C Forster; Masami Tatsuno; Bruce L McNaughton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Do rats with retrosplenial cortex lesions lack direction?

Authors:  Helen H J Pothuizen; John P Aggleton; Seralynne D Vann
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Head direction cell activity monitored in a novel environment and during a cue conflict situation.

Authors:  J S Taube; H L Burton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. I. Description and quantitative analysis.

Authors:  J S Taube; R U Muller; J B Ranck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The retrosplenial cortex: intrinsic connectivity and connections with the (para)hippocampal region in the rat. An interactive connectome.

Authors:  Jørgen Sugar; Menno P Witter; Niels M van Strien; Natalie L M Cappaert
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.081

10.  Examining the role of the temporo-parietal network in memory, imagery, and viewpoint transformations.

Authors:  Kiret Dhindsa; Vladislav Drobinin; John King; Geoffrey B Hall; Neil Burgess; Suzanna Becker
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  The head direction cell network: attractor dynamics, integration within the navigation system, and three-dimensional properties.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Jean Laurens
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  The retrosplenial-parietal network and reference frame coordination for spatial navigation.

Authors:  Benjamin J Clark; Christine M Simmons; Laura E Berkowitz; Aaron A Wilber
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Testing the Efficacy of Single-Cell Stimulation in Biasing Presubicular Head Direction Activity.

Authors:  Stefano Coletta; Markus Frey; Khaled Nasr; Patricia Preston-Ferrer; Andrea Burgalossi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Neural mechanisms of navigation involving interactions of cortical and subcortical structures.

Authors:  James R Hinman; Holger Dannenberg; Andrew S Alexander; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Models of spatial and temporal dimensions of memory.

Authors:  Michael E Hasselmo; James R Hinman; Holger Dannenberg; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2017-06-15

6.  Evidence-based source modeling of nociceptive cortical responses: A direct comparison of scalp and intracranial activity in humans.

Authors:  Claire Bradley; Hélène Bastuji; Luis Garcia-Larrea
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Cognitive, Systems, and Computational Neurosciences of the Self in Motion.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Noel; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 8.  The cognitive map in humans: spatial navigation and beyond.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; Eva Zita Patai; Joshua B Julian; Hugo J Spiers
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 9.  The Neurocognitive Basis of Spatial Reorientation.

Authors:  Joshua B Julian; Alexandra T Keinath; Steven A Marchette; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  A neural-level model of spatial memory and imagery.

Authors:  Andrej Bicanski; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.