Literature DB >> 29487125

Testing the Efficacy of Single-Cell Stimulation in Biasing Presubicular Head Direction Activity.

Stefano Coletta1,2, Markus Frey1, Khaled Nasr1,2, Patricia Preston-Ferrer3, Andrea Burgalossi3.   

Abstract

To support navigation, the firing of head direction (HD) neurons must be tightly anchored to the external space. Indeed, inputs from external landmarks can rapidly reset the preferred direction of HD cells. Landmark stimuli have often been simulated as excitatory inputs from "visual cells" (encoding landmark information) to the HD attractor network; when excitatory visual inputs are sufficiently strong, preferred directions switch abruptly to the landmark location. In the present work, we tested whether mimicking such inputs via juxtacellular stimulation would be sufficient for shifting the tuning of individual presubicular HD cells recorded in passively rotated male rats. We recorded 81 HD cells in a cue-rich environment, and evoked spikes trains outside of their preferred direction (distance range, 11-178°). We found that HD tuning was remarkably resistant to activity manipulations. Even strong stimulations, which induced seconds-long spike trains, failed to induce a detectable shift in directional tuning. HD tuning curves before and after stimulation remained highly correlated, indicating that postsynaptic activation alone is insufficient for modifying HD output. Our data are thus consistent with the predicted stability of an HD attractor network when anchored to external landmarks. A small spiking bias at the stimulus direction could only be observed in a visually deprived environment in which both average firing rates and directional tuning were markedly reduced. Based on this evidence, we speculate that, when attractor dynamics become unstable (e.g., under disorientation), the output of HD neurons could be more efficiently controlled by strong biasing stimuli.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The activity of head direction (HD) cells is thought to provide the mammalian brain with an internal sense of direction. To support navigation, the firing of HD neurons must be anchored to external landmarks, a process thought to be supported by associative plasticity within the HD system. Here, we investigated these plasticity mechanisms by juxtacellular stimulation of single HD neurons in vivo in awake rats. We found that HD coding is strongly resistant to external manipulations of spiking activity. Only in a visually deprived environment was juxtacellular stimulation able to induce a small activity bias in single presubicular neurons. We propose that juxtacellular stimulation can bias HD tuning only when competing anchoring inputs are reduced or not available.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/383287-16$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cortical physiology; head direction cell; in vivo electrophysiology; single-cell stimulation; spatial navigation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29487125      PMCID: PMC6596058          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1814-17.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  74 in total

1.  A model of the neural basis of the rat's sense of direction.

Authors:  W E Skaggs; J J Knierim; H S Kudrimoti; B L McNaughton
Journal:  Adv Neural Inf Process Syst       Date:  1995

2.  Background, but not foreground, spatial cues are taken as references for head direction responses by rat anterodorsal thalamus neurons.

Authors:  M B Zugaro; A Berthoz; S I Wiener
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Grid cells in pre- and parasubiculum.

Authors:  Charlotte N Boccara; Francesca Sargolini; Veslemøy Hult Thoresen; Trygve Solstad; Menno P Witter; Edvard I Moser; May-Britt Moser
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-25       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. II. Effects of environmental manipulations.

Authors:  J S Taube; R U Muller; J B Ranck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Neuroarchitecture and neuroanatomy of the Drosophila central complex: A GAL4-based dissection of protocerebral bridge neurons and circuits.

Authors:  Tanya Wolff; Nirmala A Iyer; Gerald M Rubin
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Origins of landmark encoding in the brain.

Authors:  Ryan M Yoder; Benjamin J Clark; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  Projections from the presubiculum and the parasubiculum to morphologically characterized entorhinal-hippocampal projection neurons in the rat.

Authors:  M Caballero-Bleda; M P Witter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Cue control and head direction cells.

Authors:  J P Goodridge; P A Dudchenko; K A Worboys; E J Golob; J S Taube
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Place cells, head direction cells, and the learning of landmark stability.

Authors:  J J Knierim; H S Kudrimoti; B L McNaughton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Environmental Anchoring of Head Direction in a Computational Model of Retrosplenial Cortex.

Authors:  Andrej Bicanski; Neil Burgess
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  1 in total

1.  Behavior-dependent directional tuning in the human visual-navigation network.

Authors:  Matthias Nau; Tobias Navarro Schröder; Markus Frey; Christian F Doeller
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 14.919

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.