| Literature DB >> 27852235 |
Andrea Ottesen1, Padmini Ramachandran2, Elizabeth Reed2, James R White3, Nur Hasan4, Poorani Subramanian4, Gina Ryan2, Karen Jarvis5, Christopher Grim5, Ninalynn Daquiqan5, Darcy Hanes5, Marc Allard2, Rita Colwell4, Eric Brown2, Yi Chen2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microbiota that co-enrich during efforts to recover pathogens from foodborne outbreaks interfere with efficient detection and recovery. Here, dynamics of co-enriching microbiota during recovery of Listeria monocytogenes from naturally contaminated ice cream samples linked to an outbreak are described for three different initial enrichment formulations used by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the International Organization of Standardization (ISO), and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Enrichment cultures were analyzed using DNA extraction and sequencing from samples taken every 4 h throughout 48 h of enrichment. Resphera Insight and CosmosID analysis tools were employed for high-resolution profiling of 16S rRNA amplicons and whole genome shotgun data, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA; Buffered Listeria enrichment broth (BLEB); Co-enriching bacteria; Enrichment; FDA; Fraser broth (FB); Half-Fraser broth (HFB); ISO; Ice cream; Listeria monocytogenes; Microbiota; NGS; Next-generation sequencing; Shotgun metagenomics; USDA; University of Vermont modified broth (UVM)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27852235 PMCID: PMC5112668 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-016-0894-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Fig. 1Temporal incidence and relative abundance of L. monocytogenes and co-enriching bacterial genera in BLEB, HFB-FB, and UVM-FB media every 4 h for 48 h. Incidence and abundance of L. monocytogenes (maroon) and co-enriching bacterial genera are shown at four hour intervals from hour 0 through 48 h of enrichment (a) for three enrichment protocols (B = BLEB, H = HFB-FB, and U = UVM-FB) (b). Four independent replicates for each enrichment at each time-point were pooled and sequenced to constitute each bar. The y-axis shows percent abundance of each taxonomic group within the total library
Fig. 2Taxonomic profiles of co-occurring bacteria and L. monocytogenes strains derived from the shotgun metagenomic data employing Cosmos ID algorithms. Taxonomy and relative abundance of L. monocytogenes and co-occurring bacterial taxa, identified using the k-mer based approached developed by CosmosID
Shotgun data for potential target assemblies
| Broth Type-Hour |
| Size of the genome covered |
| Total sample reads | Predicted depth (x) | % Genome coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U-24 h | 3109342 | 738261.44 | 59165 | 30102152 | 12.02 | 23.74 |
| H-24 h | 3109342 | 2280235.96 | 115521 | 15195488 | 7.6 | 73.34 |
| B-24 h | 3109342 | 3023679.63 | 239719 | 35204116 | 11.89 | 97.25 |
| U-28 h | 3109342 | 1360440.77 | 132749 | 81801390 | 14.64 | 43.75 |
| H-28 h | 3109342 | 3029431.91 | 419418 | 20818100 | 20.77 | 97.43 |
| B-28 h | 3109342 | 2981548.04 | 1884038 | 46165270 | 94.78 | 95.89 |
B BLEB, H HFB-FB, U UVM-FB
Shotgun sequence data are shown for hours 24 and 28 for all three enrichments. The target L. monocytogenes genome size is 3,109,342 bases
Fig. 3Incidence and abundance of L. monocytogenes 16S rRNA gene sequence variants. Relative abundance of three Listeria monocytogenes 16S rRNA gene sequence variant types: AC, GT, and GC. Variants occurred at positions 159 and 174 (E. coli positions NCBI accession?) within the 16S rRNA gene. The y-axis shows the percent abundance of each L. monocytogenes16S rRNA gene sequence variant within the total microbial community at each time point
Characterization and distribution of 16S rRNA variants present in closed L. monocytogenes genomes
| 16S variants across genomes ( | 16S variant within genomes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variant by copy number (% total genomes) | |||||||||||
| Variant | Genomesa (%) | Lineage (intra-lineal prevalence) | 6 | 5b | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |||
| I ( | II ( | III ( | Individual variant | ||||||||
| GC | 48 (70.6) | 26 (68.4) | 18 (72) | 4 (100) | GC | 31 (0.46) | 9 (0.13) | 5 (0.07) | 2 (0.03) | 1 (0.01) | n.d. |
| GT | 14 (20.6) | 9 (23.7) | 5 (20) | n.d. | GT | 2 (0.03) | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 3 (0.04) | 9 (0.13) |
| AC | 15 (22.1) | 8 (21.1) | 6 (24) | n.d. | AC | 12 (0.18) | 2 (0.03) | n.d. | n.d. | 1 (0.01) | n.d. |
| GC.2 | 1 (1.5) | 5 (13.2) | n.d. | n.d. | GC.2 | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | 1 (0.01) | n.d. | n.d. |
| GC.3 | 5 (7.4) | 1 (2.6) | n.d. | n.d. | GC.3 | 3 (0.04) | n.d. | 1 (0.01) | n.d. | n.d. | 1 (0.01) |
| Total | 48 (0.71) | 11 (0.16) | 6 (0.09) | 3 (0.04) | 5 (0.07) | 10 (0.15) | |||||
aSeveral genomes encoded multiple (different) 16S variants
bSix genomes carried only five 16S copies, with types GC and AC found in three and two genomes, respectively
Fig. 4Incidence of L. monocytogenes strains detected by Cosmos ID. Relative abundance and incidence of three putative strains of L. monocytogenes are shown for hours 0 to 48