Literature DB >> 27847854

Spinopelvic Fixation of Sacroiliac Joint Fractures and Fracture-Dislocations: A Clinical 8 Years Follow-Up Study.

Mohammad R Sobhan1, Seyed Mohammad J Abrisham1, Mahmood Vakili1, Saeed Shirdel1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pelvic ring injuries and sacroiliac dislocations have significant impacts on patient's quality of life. Several techniques have been described for posterior pelvic fixation. The current study has been designed to evaluate the spinopelvic method of fixation for sacroiliac fractures and fracture-dislocations.
METHODS: Between January 2006 and December 2014, 14 patients with sacroiliac joint fractures, dislocation and fracture-dislocation were treated by Spinopelvic fixation at Shahid Sadoughi Training Hospital, Yazd, Iran. Patients were seen in follow up, on average, out to 32 months after surgery. Computed tomographic (CT) scans of patients with sacral fractures were reviewed to determine the presence of injuries. A functional assessment of the patients was performed using Majeed's score. Patient demographics, reduction quality, loss of fixation, outcomes and complications, return to activity, and screw hardware characteristics are described.
RESULTS: The injury was unilateral in 11 (78.5%) patients and bilateral in 3 (21.5%). Associated injuries were present in all patients, including fractures, dislocation and abdominal injuries. Lower limb length discrepancy was less than 10 mm in all patients except two. Displacement, as a measure of quality of reduction was less than 5 mm in 13 patients. The mean Majeed score was 78/100. Wound infection and hardware failure were observed in 3 (21.4%) and 1 (7.1%) cases, respectively. In this study most patients (85%) return to work postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: According to the findings, spinopelvic fixation is a safe and effective technique for treatment of sacroiliac injuries. This method can obtain early partial to full weight bearing and possibly reduce the complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dislocation; Fractures; Sacroiliac joint; Spinopelvic fixation

Year:  2016        PMID: 27847854      PMCID: PMC5100457     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg        ISSN: 2345-461X


  20 in total

1.  Transperitoneal screw fixation of the sacroiliac joint.

Authors:  T S Bijlsma; C Van der Werken; A Fernandez Dell'Oca
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2000-07

2.  Displaced spinopelvic dissociation with sacral cauda equina syndrome: outcome of surgical decompression with a preliminary management algorithm.

Authors:  Mostafa A Ayoub
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  S1 pediculoiliac screw fixation in instabilities of the sacroiliac complex: biomechanical study and report of two cases.

Authors:  Cüneyt Sar; Onder Kilicoglu
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Grading the outcome of pelvic fractures.

Authors:  S A Majeed
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-03

5.  Anterior approach and stabilization of the disrupted sacroiliac joint.

Authors:  L A Simpson; J P Waddell; R K Leighton; J F Kellam; M Tile
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1987-12

Review 6.  Traumatic spinopelvic dissociation or U-shaped sacral fracture: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Chengla Yi; David J Hak
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.586

7.  Factors associated with outcome of spinopelvic dissociation treated with lumbopelvic fixation.

Authors:  Jan Lindahl; Tatu J Mäkinen; Seppo K Koskinen; Tim Söderlund
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Unilateral versus bilateral iliac screws for spinopelvic fixation: are two screws better than one?

Authors:  Rajiv Saigal; Darryl Lau; Rishi Wadhwa; Hai Le; Morsi Khashan; Sigurd Berven; Dean Chou; Praveen V Mummaneni
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 9.  Fixation techniques for complex traumatic transverse sacral fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Samuel Bederman; Jeffrey M Hassan; Kalpit N Shah; P Douglas Kiester; Nitin N Bhatia; David P Zamorano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Treatment of pelvic fractures through a less invasive ilioinguinal approach combined with a minimally invasive posterior approach.

Authors:  Lei Zhu; Lu Wang; Di Shen; Tian-wen Ye; Liang-yu Zhao; Ai-min Chen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Spinopelvic fixation for vertically unstable AO type C pelvic fractures and sacral fractures with spinopelvic dissociation- A systematic review and pooled analysis involving 479 patients.

Authors:  Sandeep Patel; Akash Ghosh; Karan Jindal; Vishal Kumar; Sameer Aggarwal; Prasoon Kumar
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-02-01

2.  Do all Isler's type sacral fractures necessarily require surgical fixation?

Authors:  Rishi M Kanna; K Guna Pratheep; Ajoy P Shetty; S Rajasekaran
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.721

Review 3.  Traumatic Lumbosacral Dislocation: Current Concepts in Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Andrew S Moon; Kivanc Atesok; Thomas E Niemeier; Sakthivel R Manoharan; Jason L Pittman; Steven M Theiss
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2018-10-28

Review 4.  Patient Weight-bearing after Pelvic Fracture Surgery-A Systematic Review of the Literature: What is the Modern Evidence Base?

Authors:  Mark Rickman; Bjorn-Christian Link; Lucian B Solomon
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2019 Jan-Apr

5.  Clinical and Patient-Related Outcome After Stabilization of Dorsal Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Retrospective Study Comparing Transiliac Fixator (TIFI) and Spinopelvic Fixation (SPF).

Authors:  Ricarda Johanna Seemann; Erik Hempel; Gabriele Rußow; Serafeim Tsitsilonis; Ulrich Stöckle; Sven Märdian
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-11-29

6.  The socioeconomic impact of orthopaedic trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nathan N O'Hara; Marckenley Isaac; Gerard P Slobogean; Niek S Klazinga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.