BACKGROUND: Posterior pelvic ring injuries can be fixed using iliosacral screws, plates or bars. Another promising modality is spinopelvic fixation or triangular osteosynthesis, indicated in vertical instability and sacral fractures associated with spinopelvic dissociation. QUESTION/ PURPOSE: This systematic review and pooled analysis was conducted to analyze the outcomes (functional and radiological) of the use of spinopelvic fixation, as well as assess the associated complications and neurological recovery. METHODS: A systematic review of literature was performed from the PubMed/Medline, EMBASE and the SCOPUS databases. All studies reporting on spinopelvic fixations, with a minimum follow up of 1 year were included in the review. Pooled analysis was done for the outcome and complication rates. The MINORS Tool was used for assessing the risk of bias. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies were included with average follow-up between 12 and 86.4 months. There were 7 prospective and 15 retrospective case series. The functional outcomes were excellent/good in 90% cases, across 8 studies (95% CI 84-95%); radiological outcomes were excellent/good in 97% cases (95% CI 94-100%) across 5 studies. The most commonly reported complications were hardware prominence in 21.3% (95% CI 11.6,30.9%) and infections in 7.2% cases (95% CI 4.8,9.5%). 73% of the patients reported partial or complete improvement in their neurological condition. CONCLUSION: Spinopelvic fixation is an effective method in vertical instability of the pelvis and sacral fractures with spinopelvic dissociations, with good to excellent radiological and functional outcomes. However, adequate precautions are needed to avoid infections and wound complications.
BACKGROUND: Posterior pelvic ring injuries can be fixed using iliosacral screws, plates or bars. Another promising modality is spinopelvic fixation or triangular osteosynthesis, indicated in vertical instability and sacral fractures associated with spinopelvic dissociation. QUESTION/ PURPOSE: This systematic review and pooled analysis was conducted to analyze the outcomes (functional and radiological) of the use of spinopelvic fixation, as well as assess the associated complications and neurological recovery. METHODS: A systematic review of literature was performed from the PubMed/Medline, EMBASE and the SCOPUS databases. All studies reporting on spinopelvic fixations, with a minimum follow up of 1 year were included in the review. Pooled analysis was done for the outcome and complication rates. The MINORS Tool was used for assessing the risk of bias. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies were included with average follow-up between 12 and 86.4 months. There were 7 prospective and 15 retrospective case series. The functional outcomes were excellent/good in 90% cases, across 8 studies (95% CI 84-95%); radiological outcomes were excellent/good in 97% cases (95% CI 94-100%) across 5 studies. The most commonly reported complications were hardware prominence in 21.3% (95% CI 11.6,30.9%) and infections in 7.2% cases (95% CI 4.8,9.5%). 73% of the patients reported partial or complete improvement in their neurological condition. CONCLUSION: Spinopelvic fixation is an effective method in vertical instability of the pelvis and sacral fractures with spinopelvic dissociations, with good to excellent radiological and functional outcomes. However, adequate precautions are needed to avoid infections and wound complications.